Skip to main content

Many-Electron Systems at Equilibrium

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Many-electron Electrochemical Processes

Part of the book series: Monographs in Electrochemistry ((MOEC))

  • 1244 Accesses

Abstract

According to the ideas considered in Chap. 1, when electric current passes through the electrolyte containing species of a polyvalent element in highest oxidation state N, the N – 1 low valency intermediates (LVIs) are formed in all possible oxidation states. Assuming the system is at equilibrium conditions, its properties have been determined by thermodynamic stability of the intermediates.

Any data can be generalized in an infinite number of ways. From them, we must choose only one, namely, the simplest one.

H. Poincarè

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    No possible set of independent equilibria fulfils these conditions. For example, N – 1 elementary disproportionation reactions of Eq. (1.8) type were used to describe the reversible polarographic wave of N-electron process [1]; however, the mathematics is too cumbersome in this case.

  2. 2.

    For example, three equilibria should be used for the description of the system where Ti metal is at equilibrium with the melt containing Ti(IV) species: \( 3/4\mathrm{ Ti}(0) + 1/4\mathrm{ Ti}(\mathrm{ I}\mathrm{ V})\leftrightarrows \mathrm{ Ti}(\mathrm{ I}) \), \( 1/2\mathrm{ Ti}(0) + 1/2\mathrm{ Ti}(\mathrm{ IV})\leftrightarrows \mathrm{ Ti}\ (\mathrm{ II}) \), and \( 1/4\mathrm{ Ti}(0) + 3/4\mathrm{ Ti}(\mathrm{ IV})\leftrightarrows \mathrm{ Ti}\ (\mathrm{ III}) \).

  3. 3.

    It is worthwhile to remember the “non-system” electrochemistry operating with “αn a-equations” which was mentioned in Chap. 1. Remaining in the framework this misconception, such situation would be dealt with regarding the process as one-step two-electron irreversible one and introducing “transfer coefficient” into the denominator of pre-logarithm coefficient of Eq. (2.76).

  4. 4.

    Of course, it is correct for Nernstian reversible process, which is the only subject of this chapter.

  5. 5.

    In a way, both approaches are true, because nobody can propose an experimentum crusis to distinguish which of them is right and which is wrong—such experiment is impossible in principle. Let us explain this statement. For example, experimental study of a process \( E(\mathrm{ IV})+4{e^{-}}\to E(0) \) by cyclic voltammetry gave following results: (1) only one wave was observed; (2) E(0) was reliably identified as the final product. OK, says a “non-system” electrochemist, the process is one-step four-electron one. We try to prove that he is wrong. For that, we carry out a second experiment investigating the same process by some modern fast technique. We apply very short pulses of current or potential and fix the intermediates by an appropriate spectral method in situ. Finally, we resolve each intermediate identifying it as short-lived compound which decomposes quickly by disproportionation reactions. “You see—we could say to the colleague—you are wrong, the process is stepwise, each step is one-electron, in accordance with our” system “concept, although both thermodynamic and kinetic stability of intermediates are very low and that is why we did not see it in the first experiment.” “You proved nothing”—might be the answer. “The process was the one-step in the first experiment and became multistep in the conditions of the second experiment, that is all”. But the nature of process cannot be dependent on the experimental conditions!—we oppose. Stop! Here we come to the core. The statement in italics is not a fact that can, by any means, be verified experimentally. It is pure convention. A fruitful convention, because it brings many separated facts into one system. That is why our concept is neither true nor wrong—it is just more convenient for any research purpose.

References

  1. Boiko OI, Chernov RV (1983) Ukrainian Chem J 49:936–941

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Andriiko AA, Boiko OI (1983) Ukrainian Chem J 53:1165–1172, 1279–1286

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dove MF, Court TL (1971) J Chem Soc D 14:726–735

    Google Scholar 

  4. Morachevskii AG, Demidov AI (1975) Reactions of metals with molten salts. In Rastvory, Rasplavy (Solutions and melts), vol 2. VINITI, Moscow, pp 242–270

    Google Scholar 

  5. Beck M (1973) Equilibrium chemistry of complex formation reactions. Mir, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rossotti F, Rossotti C (1961) Calculation of stability constants and other equilibrium constants in solutions. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  7. Markov BF (1974) Thermodynamics of molten salt mixtures. Naukova Dumka, Kiev (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Markov BF (ed) (1985) Thermodynamic properties of molten salt systems. Reference guide. Naukova Dumka, Kiev

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bukun NG, Ukshe EA (1961) Zhurnal Neorganicheskoi Khimii (Soviet J Inorg Chem) 6:913–924

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Grjotheim K, Holm JL, Malmo J (1970) Acta Chem Scand 24:77–84

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Smirnov MV (1973) Electrode potentials in molten chlorides. Nauka, Moscow (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kisza A, Trzebiatovski W (1962) Bull Acad Polon Sci Ser Sci Chem 10:387–394

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Delimarskii YK, Andriiko AA, Tchernov RV (1981) Ukrainian Chem J 47:787–794

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Boiko OI, Delimarskii YK, Chernov RV (1985) Ukrainian Chemical J 51:385–389

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zakharov MS, Bakanov VI, Pnev VV (1978) Chronopotentiometry. Chemistry. Khimiya, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  16. Evans DH, Price JE (1963) J Electroanal Chem 5:77–86

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Damaskin BB, Petriy OA (1983) Introduction to electrochemical kinetics. Vysshaja Shkola, Moskow (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Andriiko AA, Tchernov RV (1980) Ukrainian Chem J 46:1257–1264

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Testa AC, Reinmuth WH (1961) Anal Chem 33:1320–1328

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Baraboshkin AN, Saltykova NA, Kosikhin LT (1966) Trudy Instituta Elektrokhimii UF AN SSSR (Trans Ural Inst Electrochem USSR Acad Sci) 9:53–59

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Andriiko, A.A., Andriyko, Y.O., Nauer, G.E. (2013). Many-Electron Systems at Equilibrium. In: Many-electron Electrochemical Processes. Monographs in Electrochemistry. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35770-1_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics