Abstract
Toxicity testing for regulatory purposes began after the thalidomide (Contergan®) tragedy in Germany around 1960, when unexpectedly the hypnotic drug caused severe limb malformations in newborns whose mothers had taken the drug during pregnancy. This accident initiated in the first place regulatory testing for drugs, while safety testing of other chemicals, e.g., pesticides, industrial chemicals, cosmetics, and food ingredients, has become mandatory at the international level about 20 years later. Meanwhile regulatory safety testing of chemicals is mandatory in all OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, http://www.oecd.org/) member states, which are the major industrial countries except Brazil, China, and India. Initially test requirements as well as individual tests were developed at the national level, and therefore, they differed quite significantly due to experience at the national level of both in industry and regulatory agencies. As a consequence, international industry had to conduct different sets of safety tests to meet the legal requirements in each of these countries. In essence, differences in test requirements created a considerable financial burden both for the industry and also for patients and consumers, who in the end have to pay for testing. Thus, the differences in testing requirements, which were not based on scientific grounds, resulted in barriers to international trade.
Finally, the major industrial nations agreed to correct the situation by harmonizing the safety testing requirements. At the OECD, industry and regulatory agencies took the lead in this activity, since regulatory testing has a higher priority for them than for research-driven academic institutions. It was the goal of the harmonization activity to achieve mutual acceptance of data (MAD) by OECD member countries when the data were produced according to standardized testing requirements. Today harmonization of test guidelines has been achieved for regulatory testing in all areas of toxicology. In addition, the criteria for development and validation of new test methods have been harmonized, since test guidelines have to be updated continuously according to scientific progress and also to meet the needs of testing for newly emerging endpoints.
In this chapter the concept of the mutual acceptance of data (MAD) produced in standardized and harmonized toxicity tests is described and also the criteria for developing, validating, and achieving international acceptance of new tests methods.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Balls M, Blaauboer B, Brusik D (1990) Report and recommendations of the CAAT/ERGATT workshop on the validation of toxicity test procedures. ATLA 18:313–337
Balls M, Blaauboer BJ, Fentem J (1995a) Practical aspects of the validation of toxicity test procedures. The report and recommendations of ECVAM Workshop 5. ATLA 23:129–147
Balls M, Botham PA, Bruner LH (1995b) The EC/HO international validation study on alternatives to the Draize eye irritation test. Toxicol In Vitro 9:871–929
Bauch C, Kolle SN, Ramirez T (2012) Putting the parts together: combining in vitro methods to test for skin sensitizing potentials. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 63:489–504
Curren RD, Southee JA, Spielmann H (1995) The role of prevalidation in the development, validation and acceptance of alternative methods. ATLA 23:211–217
ESAC (ECVAM Scientific Advisory Committee) (1998) Statement on the scientific validity of the 3T3 NRU PT test (an in vitro test for phototoxic potential). ATLA 26:7–8
European Commission (1983) Directive 83/467EEC adapting to technical progress for the fifth time Council Directive 67/548/EEC on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances. EU DG Environment, Brussels, 122 pp
European Commission (2003) Directive 2003/15/EC amending Council Directive 76/768/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to cosmetic products. OJ Eur Union Law 66:26–35
European Commission (2006) Directive 1907/2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, and Authorization of Chemicals, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC. OJ Eur Union Law 396:1–845
OECD (1982–2013) Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 4, Health Effects, http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/environment/oecd-guidelines-for-the-testing-of-chemicals-section-4-health-effects_20745788.
OECD (1996) Final report of the OECD workshop on harmonization of validation and acceptance criteria for alternative toxicological tests methods. OECD Publication Office, Paris, 53 pp
OECD (2004) OECD guidelines for the testing of chemicals: test guideline 432 “in vitro 3T3 NRU phototoxicity test”. OECD Publication Office, Paris, p 15
OECD (2005) Guidance document on the validation and international acceptance of new or updated test methods for hazard assessment. OECD Publication Office, Paris, 96 pp
Spielmann H, Balls M, Dupuis J (1998a) The international EU/COLIPA in vitro phototoxicity validation study: results of Phase II (blind trial); part 1: the 3T3 NRU phototoxicity test. Toxicol In Vitro 12:305–327
Spielmann H, Balls M, Dupuis J (1998b) A study on UV filter chemicals from Annex VII of European Union Directive 76/768/EEC, in the in vitro 3T3 NRU phototoxicity test. ATLA 26:679–708
US National Research Council (2007) Toxicity testing in the 21st century: a vision and strategy. National Academic Press, Washington, DC, 216 pp
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this entry
Cite this entry
Spielmann, H. (2014). International Regulation of Toxicological Test Systems. In: Reichl, FX., Schwenk, M. (eds) Regulatory Toxicology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35374-1_41
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35374-1_41
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-35373-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-35374-1
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences