Skip to main content

International Regulation of Toxicological Test Systems

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Regulatory Toxicology

Abstract

Toxicity testing for regulatory purposes began after the thalidomide (Contergan®) tragedy in Germany around 1960, when unexpectedly the hypnotic drug caused severe limb malformations in newborns whose mothers had taken the drug during pregnancy. This accident initiated in the first place regulatory testing for drugs, while safety testing of other chemicals, e.g., pesticides, industrial chemicals, cosmetics, and food ingredients, has become mandatory at the international level about 20 years later. Meanwhile regulatory safety testing of chemicals is mandatory in all OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, http://www.oecd.org/) member states, which are the major industrial countries except Brazil, China, and India. Initially test requirements as well as individual tests were developed at the national level, and therefore, they differed quite significantly due to experience at the national level of both in industry and regulatory agencies. As a consequence, international industry had to conduct different sets of safety tests to meet the legal requirements in each of these countries. In essence, differences in test requirements created a considerable financial burden both for the industry and also for patients and consumers, who in the end have to pay for testing. Thus, the differences in testing requirements, which were not based on scientific grounds, resulted in barriers to international trade.

Finally, the major industrial nations agreed to correct the situation by harmonizing the safety testing requirements. At the OECD, industry and regulatory agencies took the lead in this activity, since regulatory testing has a higher priority for them than for research-driven academic institutions. It was the goal of the harmonization activity to achieve mutual acceptance of data (MAD) by OECD member countries when the data were produced according to standardized testing requirements. Today harmonization of test guidelines has been achieved for regulatory testing in all areas of toxicology. In addition, the criteria for development and validation of new test methods have been harmonized, since test guidelines have to be updated continuously according to scientific progress and also to meet the needs of testing for newly emerging endpoints.

In this chapter the concept of the mutual acceptance of data (MAD) produced in standardized and harmonized toxicity tests is described and also the criteria for developing, validating, and achieving international acceptance of new tests methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Balls M, Blaauboer B, Brusik D (1990) Report and recommendations of the CAAT/ERGATT workshop on the validation of toxicity test procedures. ATLA 18:313–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Balls M, Blaauboer BJ, Fentem J (1995a) Practical aspects of the validation of toxicity test procedures. The report and recommendations of ECVAM Workshop 5. ATLA 23:129–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Balls M, Botham PA, Bruner LH (1995b) The EC/HO international validation study on alternatives to the Draize eye irritation test. Toxicol In Vitro 9:871–929

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bauch C, Kolle SN, Ramirez T (2012) Putting the parts together: combining in vitro methods to test for skin sensitizing potentials. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 63:489–504

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Curren RD, Southee JA, Spielmann H (1995) The role of prevalidation in the development, validation and acceptance of alternative methods. ATLA 23:211–217

    Google Scholar 

  • ESAC (ECVAM Scientific Advisory Committee) (1998) Statement on the scientific validity of the 3T3 NRU PT test (an in vitro test for phototoxic potential). ATLA 26:7–8

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (1983) Directive 83/467EEC adapting to technical progress for the fifth time Council Directive 67/548/EEC on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances. EU DG Environment, Brussels, 122 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2003) Directive 2003/15/EC amending Council Directive 76/768/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to cosmetic products. OJ Eur Union Law 66:26–35

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2006) Directive 1907/2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, and Authorization of Chemicals, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC. OJ Eur Union Law 396:1–845

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1982–2013) Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 4, Health Effects, http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/environment/oecd-guidelines-for-the-testing-of-chemicals-section-4-health-effects_20745788.

  • OECD (1996) Final report of the OECD workshop on harmonization of validation and acceptance criteria for alternative toxicological tests methods. OECD Publication Office, Paris, 53 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2004) OECD guidelines for the testing of chemicals: test guideline 432 “in vitro 3T3 NRU phototoxicity test”. OECD Publication Office, Paris, p 15

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2005) Guidance document on the validation and international acceptance of new or updated test methods for hazard assessment. OECD Publication Office, Paris, 96 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielmann H, Balls M, Dupuis J (1998a) The international EU/COLIPA in vitro phototoxicity validation study: results of Phase II (blind trial); part 1: the 3T3 NRU phototoxicity test. Toxicol In Vitro 12:305–327

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spielmann H, Balls M, Dupuis J (1998b) A study on UV filter chemicals from Annex VII of European Union Directive 76/768/EEC, in the in vitro 3T3 NRU phototoxicity test. ATLA 26:679–708

    Google Scholar 

  • US National Research Council (2007) Toxicity testing in the 21st century: a vision and strategy. National Academic Press, Washington, DC, 216 pp

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Horst Spielmann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this entry

Cite this entry

Spielmann, H. (2014). International Regulation of Toxicological Test Systems. In: Reichl, FX., Schwenk, M. (eds) Regulatory Toxicology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35374-1_41

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics