Skip to main content

Clique Cover and Graph Separation: New Incompressibility Results

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 7391))

Abstract

The field of kernelization studies polynomial-time preprocessing routines for hard problems in the framework of parameterized complexity. In this paper we show that, unless \(\textrm{NP} \subseteq \textrm{coNP}/\textrm{poly}\) and the polynomial hierarchy collapses up to its third level, the following parameterized problems do not admit a polynomial-time preprocessing algorithm that reduces the size of an instance to polynomial in the parameter:

  • Edge Clique Cover , parameterized by the number of cliques,

  • Directed Edge/Vertex Multiway Cut , parameterized by the size of the cutset, even in the case of two terminals,

  • Edge/Vertex Multicut , parameterized by the size of the cutset,

  • and k -Way Cut , parameterized by the size of the cutset.

The existence of a polynomial kernelization for Edge Clique Cover was a seasoned veteran in open problem sessions. Furthermore, our results complement very recent developments in designing parameterized algorithms for cut problems by Marx and Razgon [STOC’11], Bousquet et al. [STOC’11], Kawarabayashi and Thorup [FOCS’11] and Chitnis et al. [SODA’12].

The full version of this paper is available online [1].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cygan, M., Kratsch, S., Pilipczuk, M., Pilipczuk, M., Wahlström, M.: Clique cover and graph separation: New incompressibility results. CoRR abs/1111.0570 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Harnik, D., Naor, M.: On the compressibility of NP instances and cryptographic applications. SIAM J. Comput. 39(5), 1667–1713 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Guo, J., Niedermeier, R.: Invitation to data reduction and problem kernelization. SIGACT News 38(1), 31–45 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bodlaender, H.L.: Kernelization: New Upper and Lower Bound Techniques. In: Chen, J., Fomin, F.V. (eds.) IWPEC 2009. LNCS, vol. 5917, pp. 17–37. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Bodlaender, H.L., Downey, R.G., Fellows, M.R., Hermelin, D.: On problems without polynomial kernels. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 75(8), 423–434 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Fortnow, L., Santhanam, R.: Infeasibility of instance compression and succinct PCPs for NP. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 77(1), 91–106 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Cai, J., Chakaravarthy, V.T., Hemaspaandra, L.A., Ogihara, M.: Competing provers yield improved Karp-Lipton collapse results. Inf. Comput. 198(1), 1–23 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Yap, C.K.: Some consequences of non-uniform conditions on uniform classes. Theor. Comput. Sci. 26, 287–300 (1983)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Bodlaender, H.L., Jansen, B.M.P., Kratsch, S.: Cross-composition: A new technique for kernelization lower bounds. In: STACS 2011, pp. 165–176 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dell, H., van Melkebeek, D.: Satisfiability allows no nontrivial sparsification unless the polynomial-time hierarchy collapses. In: STOC 2010, pp. 251–260 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dell, H., Marx, D.: Kernelization of packing problems. In: SODA 2012, pp. 68–81 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hermelin, D., Wu, X.: Weak compositions and their applications to polynomial lower bounds for kernelization. In: SODA 2012, pp. 104–113 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bodlaender, H.L., Thomassé, S., Yeo, A.: Kernel bounds for disjoint cycles and disjoint paths. Theor. Comput. Sci. 412(35), 4570–4578 (2011)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Cygan, M., Pilipczuk, M., Pilipczuk, M., Wojtaszczyk, J.O.: Kernelization Hardness of Connectivity Problems in d-Degenerate Graphs. In: Thilikos, D.M. (ed.) WG 2010. LNCS, vol. 6410, pp. 147–158. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Dom, M., Lokshtanov, D., Saurabh, S.: Incompressibility through Colors and iDs. In: Albers, S., Marchetti-Spaccamela, A., Matias, Y., Nikoletseas, S., Thomas, W. (eds.) ICALP 2009. LNCS, vol. 5555, pp. 378–389. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Bodlaender, H.L., Jansen, B.M.P., Kratsch, S.: Preprocessing for Treewidth: A Combinatorial Analysis Through Kernelization. In: Aceto, L., Henzinger, M., Sgall, J. (eds.) ICALP 2011. LNCS, vol. 6755, pp. 437–448. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Reed, B.A., Smith, K., Vetta, A.: Finding odd cycle transversals. Oper. Res. Lett. 32, 299–301 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Marx, D.: Parameterized graph separation problems. Theor. Comput. Sci. 351(3), 394–406 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Bousquet, N., Daligault, J., Thomassé, S.: Multicut is FPT. In: STOC 2011, pp. 459–468 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Chitnis, R., Hajiaghayi, M., Marx, D.: Fixed-parameter tractability of directed multiway cut parameterized by the size of the cutset. In: SODA 2012, pp. 1713–1725 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Marx, D., Razgon, I.: Fixed-parameter tractability of multicut parameterized by the size of the cutset. In: STOC 2011, pp. 469–478 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kawarabayashi, K., Thorup, M.: The minimum k-way cut of bounded size is fixed-parameter tractable. In: FOCS 2011, pp. 160–169 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Garey, M.R., Johnson, D.S.: Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness. W.H. Freeman, New York (1979)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Kellerman, E.: Determination of keyword conflict. IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin 16(2), 544–546 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Agarwal, P.K., Alon, N., Aronov, B., Suri, S.: Can visibility graphs be represented compactly? Discrete & Computational Geometry 12, 347–365 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Gramm, J., Guo, J., Hüffner, F., Niedermeier, R., Piepho, H.P., Schmid, R.: Algorithms for compact letter displays: Comparison and evaluation. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 52(2), 725–736 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Piepho, H.P.: An algorithm for a letter-based representation of all-pairwise comparisons. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 13(2), 456–466 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Rajagopalan, S., Vachharajani, M., Malik, S.: Handling irregular ILP within conventional VLIW schedulers using artificial resource constraints. In: CASES 2000, pp. 157–164 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gramm, J., Guo, J., Hüffner, F., Niedermeier, R.: Data reduction and exact algorithms for clique cover. ACM Journal of Experimental Algorithmics 13 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kratsch, S., Wahlström, M.: Compression via matroids: a randomized polynomial kernel for odd cycle transversal. In: SODA 2012, pp. 94–103 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kratsch, S., Wahlström, M.: Representative sets and irrelevant vertices: New tools for kernelization. In: CoRR abs/1111.2195 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Burlet, M., Goldschmidt, O.: A new and improved algorithm for the 3-cut problem. Oper. Res. Lett. 21(5), 225–227 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Goldschmidt, O., Hochbaum, D.S.: A polynomial algorithm for the k-cut problem for fixed k. Math. Oper. Res. 19(1), 24–37 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Thorup, M.: Minimum k-way cuts via deterministic greedy tree packing. In: STOC 2008, pp. 159–166 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Downey, R.G., Estivill-Castro, V., Fellows, M.R., Prieto, E., Rosamond, F.A.: Cutting up is hard to do: the parameterized complexity of k-cut and related problems. Electr. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci. 78, 209–222 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cygan, M., Kratsch, S., Pilipczuk, M., Pilipczuk, M., Wahlström, M. (2012). Clique Cover and Graph Separation: New Incompressibility Results. In: Czumaj, A., Mehlhorn, K., Pitts, A., Wattenhofer, R. (eds) Automata, Languages, and Programming. ICALP 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7391. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31594-7_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31594-7_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31593-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31594-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics