Skip to main content

Sociological Issues of Inclusive Web Design

The German Web 2.0 Accessibility Survey

  • Conference paper
Computers Helping People with Special Needs (ICCHP 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 7382))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The German BIENE award (Barrierefreies Internet Eröffnet Neue Einsichten / Accessible Internet Provides New Insights), a best practice compe-tition for accessible websites organized by the social association “Aktion Mensch” and the endowment “Digitale Chancen” enters into a new competitive phase. For the 2010 competition 224 web pages have been checked for their barrier free accessibility. Web applications that facilitate interactive sharing of user generated content are of particular importance, when it comes to Web 2.0 technologies. In this respect it soon turned out, that Web 2.0 services cannot only be made accessible by applying common design guidelines and ad-hoc adap-tations. In addition to conventional software ergonomic verification procedures, accessibility validation has to rely on sociological reasoning about unique Web 2.0 entities and corresponding usage obstacles. Empirically these considerations have been conceptualized by an online survey amongst 671 respondents with all kinds of different disabilities, carried out by “Aktion Mensch”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Jenkins, H., Clinton, K., Purushotma, R., Robinson, Weigel, A.J.: Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. MacArthur Foundation (2006), http://www.digitallearning.macfound.org/

  2. Beer, D., Burrows, R.: Sociology and, of and in Web 2.0: Some Initial Considerations. Sociological Research Online 12(5), 17 (2007), http://www.socresonline.org.uk/12/5/17.html

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., Warshaw, P.R.: User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Manag. Sci. 35, 982–1003 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ma, Q., Liu, L.: The technology acceptance model: A meta-analysis of empirical findings. J. of Organizational and End User Computing 16, 59–72 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Berger, A., Caspers, T., Croll, J., Hoffmann, J., Kubicek, H., Peter, U., Ruth-Janneck, D., Trump, T.: Web 2.0/barrierefrei: Eine Studie zur Nutzung von Web 2.0 Anwendungen durch Menschen mit Behinderungen. Aktion Mensch e.V., POB, 53175 Bonn (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pieper, M. (2012). Sociological Issues of Inclusive Web Design. In: Miesenberger, K., Karshmer, A., Penaz, P., Zagler, W. (eds) Computers Helping People with Special Needs. ICCHP 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7382. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31522-0_56

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31522-0_56

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31521-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31522-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics