Abstract
A major factor in the success of future long-duration space missions is the psychosocial functioning of the crew. An individual’s psychological health and well-being has a major impact on how well he or she adapts to the demands of isolation, confinement, and workload associated with complex missions. Although each crewmember possesses a unique combination of knowledge, skills, and abilities that influence their capacity to adapt, in this chapter we argue that mission success also relies on how well an individual functions in the larger social context of the mission. More specifically, interactions between crewmembers, as well as between the crew and ground personnel, play a significant role in the crew’s overall performance. Although many variables affect crew interactions, such as opportunities for personal space and privacy afforded by the spacecraft’s architecture, we contend that the most prominent factor is the crew’s composition. Beyond the size of the crew, the mixture of cultural and ethnic backgrounds, and the blend of professional expertise, the most salient crew composition variable is gender.
Since even before Valentina Tereshkova’s flight in 1963, women have played an integral role in the history of human spaceflight. As of April 2010, for instance, 53 different women have flown in space, many as part of mixed-gendered crews aboard Russian space stations or the International Space Station (ISS). The April 2010 flight of Space Shuttle Discovery to the ISS set a record for the most women in space at one time as three female crewmembers aboard Discovery—Dorothy Metcalf-Lindenburger, Stephanie Wilson, and Naoko Yamazaki—joined Station resident Tracy Caldwell Dyson in orbit. As the number of mixed-gender crews will likely increase in the future, including those taking voyages back to the Moon and then to Mars, it is prudent to ask if there are any potential limitations to men and women working together for extended periods of time.
This chapter reviews findings from mixed-gender crews in spaceflight as well as relevant analogues like aviation, Antarctic research bases, and other complex environments to highlight how gender composition moderates crew interactions and performance. To explore this relationship, we focus specifically on the variable of cohesion, or the degree to which crewmembers are committed to each other and to the crew’s shared task, and offer recommendations for the optimal gender composition for future space missions in terms of this important crew variable.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Baugh, G.S., Graen, G.B.: Effects of team gender and racial composition on perceptions of team performance in cross-functional teams. Group Organ. Manag. 22(3), 366–383 (1997)
Bishop, S.L.: Evaluating teams in extreme environments: from issues to answers. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 75(7, sect. II), C14–C21 (2004)
Burris, J.W.: The impact of gender diversity on technical team effectiveness. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering 62, Ann Arbor, Michigan (MI), USA no. 10-B: 4715 (2002)
Carless, S.A., De Paola, C.: The measurement of cohesion in work teams. Small Group Res 31(1), 71–88 (2000)
Cartwright, D.: The nature of group cohesiveness. In: Cartwright, D., Zander, A. (eds.) Group Dynamics: Research and Theory, 3rd edn. Harper and Row, New York (1968)
Davis, S.F., Palladino, J.J.: Psychology. Pearson, Upper Saddle River (2007)
Dion, K.L.: Interpersonal and group processes in long-term spaceflight crews: perspectives from social and organizational psychology. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 75(7, sect. II), C36–C43 (2004)
Eagly, A.H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M.C., van Engen, M.L.: Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: a meta-analysis comparing men and women. Psychol. Bull. 129(4), 569–591 (2003)
Endler, N.S.: The joint effects of person and situation factors on stress in spaceflight. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 75(7, sect. II), C22–C27 (2004)
Evans, C., Dion, K.: Group cohesion and performance: a meta-analysis. Small Group Res. 22(2), 175–186 (1991)
Festinger, L.: Informal social communication. Psychol. Rev. 57(5), 271–282 (1950)
Gully, S.M., Devine, D.J., Whitney, D.J.: A meta-analysis of cohesion and performance: effects of levels of analysis and task interdependence. Small Group Res 26(4), 497–520 (1995)
Harrison, A.A.: Spacefaring: The Human Dimension, p. 138. University of California Press, Berkeley (2001)
Kanas, N.: Group interactions in space, Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 75(7), C3–C5 (2004)
Kanas, N., Manzey, D.: Space Psychology and Psychiatry. Microcosm Press/Kluwer Academic, El Segundo (2003)
Kirkcaldy, B.D.: Personality profiles at various levels of athletic participation. Pers. Individ. Differ. 3(3), 321–326 (1982)
Landers, D.M., Wilkinson, M.O., Hatfield, B.D., Barber, H.: Causality and the cohesion-performance relationship. J. Sport Psychol. 4(2), 170–183 (1982)
Langfred, C.W.: Is group cohesiveness a double-edged sword? An investigation of the effects of cohesiveness on performance. Small Group Res 29, 124–143 (1998)
Lebedev, V.: Diary of a Cosmonaut: 211 Days in Space. Bantam Books, New York (1988)
LePine, J.A., Hollenbeck, J.R., Ilgen, D.R., Colquitt, J.A., Ellis, A.: Gender composition, situational strength and team decision-making accuracy: a criterion decomposition approach. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 88(1), 445–475 (2002)
Miesing, P., Preble, J.: Group processes and performance in a complex business simulation. Small Group Behav. 16, 325–338 (1985)
NASA History Division. Lovelace’s Woman in Space Program. NASA. http://history.nasa.gov/flats.html. Accessed 25 Mar 2012
NASA History Division. Women in Space, NASA. http://history.nasa.gov/women.html. Accessed 25 Mar 2012
Neubert, M.J.: Too much of a good thing or the more the merrier? Exploring the dispersion and gender composition of informal leadership in manufacturing teams. Small Group Res. 30(5), 635–646 (1995)
Panzer, F.-J.: The influence of gender and ethnic diversity on team effectiveness. ProQuest ETD Collection for Florida International University, Paper AAI3085015. Doctoral Dissertation, available: http://search.proquest.com/docview/305233519/previewPDF?accountid=27203. pp. 1–151 (2003)
Porter, T.W., Lilly, B.S.: The effects of conflict, trust, and task commitment on project team performance. Int. J. Confl. Manag. 7(4), 361–376 (1996)
Rosnet, E., Jurion, S., Cazes, G., Bachelard, C.: Mixed-gender groups: coping strategies and factors of psychological adaptation in a polar environment. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 75(7, sect. II), C10–C13 (2004)
Saimons, V.J.: Women in combat: are the risks to combat effectiveness too great? Monograph Report No. AD A258 247,(U.S. Army Command and General Staff College, School of Advanced Military Studies, Fort Leavenworth (1992)
Sandal, G.M.: Culture and tension during an international space station simulation: results from SFINCSS’99. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 75(7, sect. II), C44–C51 (2004)
Santy, P., Holland, A., Looper, L., Marcondes-North, R.: Multicultural factors in the space environment: results of an international shuttle crew debrief. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 64, 196–200 (1993)
Siebold, G.L., Kelly, D.R.: Development of the Combat Platoon Cohesion Questionnaire. ARI Technical Report 817, ADA 204917. U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Alexandria (1988)
Steiner, I.D.: Group Processes and Productivity. Academic, New York (1972)
Stogdill, R.M.: Group productivity, drive, and cohesiveness. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 8, 26–43 (1972)
Stuster, J.: Bold Endeavors: Lessons from Polar and Space Exploration. Naval Institute Press, Annapolis (1996)
Tziner, A., Vardi, Y.: Ability as a moderator between cohesiveness and tank crew’s performance. J. Occup. Behav. 4, 137–143 (1983)
Vecchio, R.P., Brazil, D.M.: Leadership and sex-similarity: a comparison in a military setting. Pers. Psychol. 60(2), 303–335 (2007)
Zaccaro, S.J., Lowe, C.A.: Cohesiveness and performance on an additive task: evidence for multidimensionality. J. Soc. Psychol. 128(4), 547–558 (1988)
Zaccaro, S.J., McCoy, M.C.: The effects of task and interpersonal cohesiveness on performance of a disjunctive group task. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 18(10), 837–851 (1988)
Zaccaro, S.J., Gualtieri, J., Minionis, D.: Task cohesion as a facilitator of team decision making under temporal emergency. Mil. Psychol. 7(2), 77–93 (1995)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kring, J.P., Kaminski, M.A. (2013). Gender Composition and Crew Cohesion During Long-Duration Space Missions. In: Vakoch, D. (eds) On Orbit and Beyond. Space Technology Library, vol 29. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30583-2_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30583-2_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-30582-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-30583-2
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)