Skip to main content

Multi-sorted Argumentation

  • Conference paper
Book cover Theorie and Applications of Formal Argumentation (TAFA 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7132))

Abstract

In the theory of abstract argumentation, the acceptance status of arguments is normally determined for the complete set of arguments at once, under a single semantics. However, this is not always desired. In this paper, we extend the notion of an argumentation framework to a multi-sorted argumentation framework, and we motivate this extension using an example which considers practical and epistemic arguments. In a multi-sorted argumentation framework, the arguments are partitioned into a number of cells, where each cell is associated with a semantics under which its arguments are evaluated. We prove the properties of the proposed framework, and we demonstrate our theory with a number of examples. Finally, we relate our theory to the theory of modal fibring of argumentation networks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amgoud, L., Cayrol, C.: On the acceptability of arguments in preference-based argumentation. In: Cooper, G.F., Moral, S. (eds.) UAI 1998: Proceedings of the Fourteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1–7. Morgan Kaufmann (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Amgoud, L., Prade, H.: Handling threats, rewards, and explanatory arguments in a unified setting. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 20(12), 1195–1218 (2005)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Baroni, P., Giacomin, M., Guida, G.: SCC-recursiveness: a general schema for argumentation semantics. Artificial Intelligence 168(1-2), 162–210 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Barringer, H., Gabbay, D.M.: Modal and Temporal Argumentation Networks. In: Manna, Z., Peled, D.A. (eds.) Time for Verification. LNCS, vol. 6200, pp. 1–25. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Bench-Capon, T.J.M.: Value-based argumentation frameworks. In: Benferhat, S., Giunchiglia, E. (eds.) NMR, pp. 443–454 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brewka, G., Eiter, T.: Argumentation Context Systems: A Framework for Abstract Group Argumentation. In: Erdem, E., Lin, F., Schaub, T. (eds.) LPNMR 2009. LNCS, vol. 5753, pp. 44–57. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Caminada, M.: Semi-stable semantics. In: Computational Models of Argument; Proceedings of COMMA, pp. 121–130 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Caminada, M.: On the Issue of Reinstatement in Argumentation. In: Fisher, M., van der Hoek, W., Konev, B., Lisitsa, A. (eds.) JELIA 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4160, pp. 111–123. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Coste-Marquis, S., Devred, C., Marquis, P.: Prudent semantics for argumentation frameworks (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artif. Intell. 77(2), 321–358 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Gabbay, D.M.: Fibring argumentation frames. Studia Logica 93(2-3), 231–295 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Modgil, S., Caminada, M.: Proof theories and algorithms for abstract argumentation frameworks. In: Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 105–129 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Prakken, H.: Combining sceptical epistemic reasoning with credulous practical reasoning. In: Dunne, P.E., Bench-Capon, T.J.M. (eds.) COMMA. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 144, pp. 311–322. IOS Press (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rotstein, N.D., García, A.J., Simari, G.R.: Reasoning from desires to intentions: A dialectical framework. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2007), pp. 136–141. AAAI Press (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rienstra, T., Perotti, A., Villata, S., Gabbay, D.M., van der Torre, L. (2012). Multi-sorted Argumentation. In: Modgil, S., Oren, N., Toni, F. (eds) Theorie and Applications of Formal Argumentation. TAFA 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7132. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29184-5_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29184-5_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-29183-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-29184-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics