Skip to main content

On the Adequacy of Three POS Taggers and a Dependency Parser

  • Conference paper
Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing (CICLing 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 7181))

  • 2011 Accesses

Abstract

A POS-tagger can be used in front of a parser to reduce the number of combinations of possible dependency trees which, in the majority, give spurious analyses. In the paper we compare the results of the addition of three morphological taggers to the parser of the CDG Lab. The experimental results show that these models perform better than the model which do not use a morphological tagger at the cost of loosing some correct analyses. In fact, the adequacy of these solutions is mainly based on the compatibility between the lexical units defined by the taggers and the dependency grammar.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abeillé, A., Barrier, N.: Enriching a french treebank. In: Proc. of LREC 2004, Lisbon, Portugal (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alfared, R., Béchet, D., Dikovsky, A.: “cdg lab”: a toolbox for dependency grammars and dependency treebanks development. In: Gerdes, K., Hajicova, E., Wanner, L. (eds.) Proc. of the 1st Intern. Conf. on Dependency Linguistics (Depling 2011), Barcelona, Spain (September 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Béchet, D., Dikovsky, A., Foret, A.: Dependency Structure Grammars. In: Blache, P., Stabler, E.P., Busquets, J.V., Moot, R. (eds.) LACL 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3492, pp. 18–34. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Boguslavsky, I., Iomdin, L., Sizov, V., Tsinman, L., Petrochenkov, V.: Rule-based dependency parser refined by empirical and corpus statistics. In: Proc. of the 1st Intern. Conf. on Dependency Linguistics (Depling 2011), Barcelona, Spain (September 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brill, E.: Some advances in transformation-based part of speech tagging. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 722–727 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Candito, M., Crabbé, B., Denis, P.: Statistical french dependency parsing: Treebank conversion and first results. In: Calzolari, N., Choukri, K., Maegaard, B., Mariani, J., Odijk, J., Piperidis, S., Rosner, M., Tapias, D. (eds.) Proceedings of the Seventh Conference on International Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2010). European Language Resources Association (ELRA), Valletta (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Collins, M., Hajic, J., Ramshaw, L., Tillmann, C.: A statistical parser for Czech. In: ACL 1999 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dekhtyar, M., Dikovsky, A.: Categorial dependency grammars. In: Moortgat, M. (ed.) Proceedings of Categorial Grammars 2004, pp. 76–91 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dekhtyar, M., Dikovsky, A.: Generalized categorial dependency grammars. In: Pillars of Computer Science 2008, pp. 230–255 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Denis, P., Sagot, B.: Coupling an annotated corpus and a morphosyntactic lexicon for state-of-the-art POS tagging with less human effort. In: Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation, Hong Kong, China (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dikovsky, A.: Categorial dependency grammars: from theory to large scale grammars. In: Gerdes, K., Hajicova, E., Wanner, L. (eds.) Proc. of the 1st Intern. Conf. on Dependency Linguistics (Depling 2011), Barcelona, Spain (September 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dikovsky, A.: Dependencies as categories. In: “Recent Advances in Dependency Grammars”, COLING 2004 Workshop, pp. 90–97 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dikovsky, A.: Towards wide coverage categorical dependency grammars. In: Proceedings of the ESSLLI 2009 Workshop Parsing with Categorial Grammars - Parsing with Categorial Grammars Workshop ESSLLI 2009 Book of Abstracts, pp. 230–255 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Eryiğit, G., Oflazer, K.: Statistical dependency parsing for turkish. In: EACL 2006, pp. 89–96 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Marinov, S., Nivre, J.: A data-driven dependency parser for bulgarian. In: Proceedings of TLT, pp. 89–100 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. McDonald, R.: Discriminative Training and Spanning Tree Algorithms for Dependency Parsing. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania (July 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Petrov, S., Barrett, L., Thibaux, R., Klein, D.: Learning accurate, compact, and interpretable tree annotation. In: ACL 2006, pp. 433–440 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sagot, B.: The lefff, a freely available and large-coverage morphological and syntactic lexicon for french. In: Calzolari, N., Choukri, K., Maegaard, B., Mariani, J., Odijk, J., Piperidis, S., Rosner, M., Tapias, D. (eds.) Proceedings of the Seventh Conference on International Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2010). European Language Resources Association (ELRA), Valletta (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schmid, H.: Probabilistic part-of-speech tagging using decision trees. In: Proceedings of International Conference on New Methods in Language Processing, Manchester, UK (1994)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Alfared, R., Béchet, D. (2012). On the Adequacy of Three POS Taggers and a Dependency Parser. In: Gelbukh, A. (eds) Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing. CICLing 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7181. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28604-9_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28604-9_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-28603-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-28604-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics