Skip to main content

Broadcast Scheduling: Minimizing Average Response Time

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Algorithms

Years and Authors of Summarized Original Work

2005; Bansal, Charikar, Khanna, Naor2008; Bansal, Coppersmith, Sviridenko2014; Bansal, Charikar, Krishnaswamy, Li

Problem Definition

In this entry, we consider the classical broadcast scheduling problem and discuss some recent advances on this problem. The problem is formalized as follows: there is a server which has a collection of unit-sized pages P = {1, , n}. The server can broadcast pages in integer time slots in response to requests, which are given as the following sequence: at time t, the server receives \(w_{p}(t) \in \mathbb{Z}_{\geq 0}\) requests for each page pP. We say that a request ρ for page p that arrives at time t is satisfied at time c p (t) if c p (t) is the first time after t by which the server has completely transmitted page p. The response time of the request ρ is defined to be c p (t) − t, i.e., the time that elapses from its arrival till the time it is satisfied. Notice that by definition, the response time...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Recommended Reading

  1. Bansal N, Charikar M, Khanna S, Naor J (2005) Approximating the average response time in broadcast scheduling. In: Proceedings of the 16th annual ACM-SIAM symposium on discrete algorithms, Vancouver

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bansal N, Charikar M, Krishnaswamy R, Li S (2014) Better algorithms and hardness for broadcast scheduling via a discrepancy approach. In: Proceedings of the 25th annual ACM-SIAM symposium on discrete algorithms, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bansal N, Coppersmith D, Sviridenko M (2008) Improved approximation algorithms for broadcast scheduling. SIAM J Comput 38(3):1157–1174

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Bansal N, Krishnaswamy R, Nagarajan V (2010) Better scalable algorithms for broadcast scheduling. In: Automata, languages and programming (ICALP), Bordeaux, pp 324–335

    Google Scholar 

  5. Erlebach T, Hall A (2002) NP-hardness of broadcast scheduling and inapproximability of singlesource unsplittable min-cost flow. In: Proceedings of the 13th ACM-SIAM symposium on discrete algorithms, San Francisco, pp 194–202

    Google Scholar 

  6. Im S, Moseley B (2012) An online scalable algorithm for average flow time in broadcast scheduling. ACM Trans Algorithms (TALG) 8(4):39

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Lovett S, Meka R (2012) Constructive discrepancy minimization by walking on the edges. In: 53rd annual IEEE symposium on foundations of computer science (FOCS), New Brunswick, pp 61–67

    Google Scholar 

  8. Newman A, Neiman O, Nikolov A (2012) Beck’s three permutations conjecture: a counterexample and some consequences. In: 2012 IEEE 53rd annual symposium on foundations of computer science (FOCS), New Brunswick. IEEE, APA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ravishankar Krishnaswamy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Krishnaswamy, R. (2014). Broadcast Scheduling: Minimizing Average Response Time. In: Kao, MY. (eds) Encyclopedia of Algorithms. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27848-8_538-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27848-8_538-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-27848-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Computer SciencesReference Module Computer Science and Engineering

Publish with us

Policies and ethics