Abstract
In this straightforwardly written ethnomathematical report of geographically and socio-culturally situated mathematical practices—patterning of artefacts and social relations among the Nalik of New Ireland—Were houses a subtle critique of the field of ethnomathematics (EM). However, his critique is rendered less potent by not having demonstrated an attention to the conversational patterns in the recent EM literature. As a reader somewhat familiar with a significant portion of the “basic” literature and the ongoing debates in the field (Khan 2008), I appreciated, however, the author pointing me to texts and manuscripts that I had not encountered. In the hope that this commentary and Were’s chapter be of utility to readers I first offer an outline of some complementary patterns in the more recent (ethno)mathematics education literature before returning to the seed that lies dormant within Were’s paper, which is to be found via a consideration of his key motif—pattern(ing).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The acronym WEIRD is used by Henrich et al. (2010) to describe the extreme exceptionality of the Western Educated Industrialized Rich Democratic populations which make up the majority of samples in psychology. They are clear to note that they, “do not intend any negative connotations or moral judgments by the acronym” (p. 83).
- 2.
I know relatively little about the dynamics of the Papua New Guinea educational situation, and what I do know is from having read a small section of the literature published in English.
- 3.
“…the cohesion of social systems depends on the maintenance of patterns of behavior; and advances in civilization depend on the fortunate modification of such behavior patterns. Thus the infusion of pattern into natural occurrences, and the stability of such patterns, and the modification of such patterns, is the necessary condition for the realization of the Good… . Mathematics is the most powerful technique for the understanding of pattern and for the analysis of the relationships of patterns” (Whitehead 1941/1951, pp. 677–678)
References
Barton, B. (2009). The language of mathematics. Telling mathematical tales. New York: Springer.
Bishop, A. J. (1990). Western mathematics: The secret weapon of cultural imperialism. Race & Class, 32(2), 51–65.
Burton, L. (2004). Mathematicians as enquirers: Learning about learning mathematics. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Byers, W. (2007). How mathematicians think: Using ambiguity, contradiction, and paradox to create mathematics. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Choppin, J., Herbel-Eisenmann, B., Pimm, D., & Wagner, D. (Eds.) (2012). Equity in discourse for mathematics education: Theories, practices and policies. New York: Springer.
Damarin, S. (2000). The mathematically able as a marked category. Gender and Education, 12(1), 69–85.
Damarin, S. (2008). Toward thinking feminism and mathematics together. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 34(1), 101–123.
D’Ambrosio, U. (2010). From Ea, through Pythagoras, to Avatar: Different settings for mathematics. In M. F. Pinto & T. F. Kawasaki (Eds.), Proceeding of the 34th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 1, pp. 1–20). Brazil: Belo Horizonte.
Denzin, N. K., Lincoln, Y. S., & Smith, L. T. (Eds.) (2008). Handbook of critical and indigenous methodologies. California: Sage Publications Inc.
Doolittle, E. (2007). Mathematics as medicine. In P. Liljedahl (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2006 CMESG annual meeting (Vol. 1, pp. 17–25). Burnaby: Canada.
Doolittle, E., & Glanfield, F. (2007). Balancing equation and culture: Indigenous educators reflect on mathematics education. For the Learning of Mathematics, 27(3), 27–30.
Gutiérrez, R. (2012). Context matters: How should we conceptualize equity in mathematics education. In J. Choppin, B. Herbel-Eisenmann, D. Pimm, & D. Wagner (Eds.), Equity in discourse for mathematics education: Theories, practices and policies (pp. 17–33). New York: Springer.
Hacker, A., & Dreifus, C. (2010). Higher education?: How colleges are wasting our money and failing our kids. New York: Times Books.
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61–83.
Khan, S. K. (2008). Mathematics and the steel drum. For the Learning of Mathematics, 28(2), 33–38.
Khan, S. K. (2010). After gender: Towards more human genres of mathematics education. Invited faculty/public research seminar, University of the West Indies, St. Augustine, Trinidad.
Nasir, N. S., Hand, V., & Taylor, E. (2008). Culture and mathematics in school: Boundaries between “cultural” and “domain” knowledge in the mathematics classroom and beyond. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 187–240.
Nicol, C. (Ed.) (2011). Living culturally responsive mathematics curriculum and pedagogy: Making a difference with/in indigenous communities. The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Pais, A. (2011). Criticisms and contradictions of ethnomathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 76(2), 209–230.
Palmer, M. A. (2010). Situated mathematical research: The interaction of academic and non-academic practices. For the Learning of Mathematics, 30(2), 32–39.
Patterson, S. (2010). The quants: How a new Breed of math whizzes conquered Wall Street and nearly destroyed it. New York: Crown Publishing.
Rosa, M., & Orey, D. C. (2007). Pop: A study of the ethnomathematics of globalization using the sacred Mayan mat pattern. In B. Atweh, M. Borba, R. Vithal, & C. Vistro-Yu (Eds.), Internationalisation and globalisation in mathematics and science education (pp. 227–246). New York: Springer.
Rivera, F., & Becker, J. R. (2007). Ethnomathematics in the Global Episteme: Quo Vadis? In B. Atweh, M. Borba, R. Vithal, & C. Vistro-Yu (Eds.), Internationalisation and globalisation in mathematics and science education (pp. 209–225). New York: Springer.
Shockey, T. (2006). Left-ventricle reduction through an ethnomathematics lens. For the Learning of Mathematics, 26(1), 2–6.
Soifer, A. (2009). The mathematical coloring book: Mathematics of coloring and the colorful life of its creators. New York: Springer.
Sorkin, A. (2010). Too big to fail: The inside story of how Wall Street and Washington fought to save the financial system and themselves. New York: Penguin.
Wagner, D., & Lunney Borden, L. (2012). Aiming for equity in ethnomathematics education research. In J. Choppin, B. Herbel-Eisenmann, D. Pimm, & D. Wagner (Eds.), Equity in discourse for mathematics education: Theories, practices, and policies (pp. 69–87). New York: Springer.
Wagner, D., & Lunney Borden, L. (in press). Common sense and necessity in (ethno)mathematics. Cultural Studies in Science Education, special issue on “informal science education”.
Whitehead, A. N. (1941/1951). Mathematics and the good. In P. A. Schlipp (Ed.), Library of living philosophers, Vol. III. The philosophy of Alfred North Whitehead (pp. 666–681). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Khan, S.K. (2012). Commentary on the Chapter by Graeme Were, “From the Known to the Unknown: Pattern, Mathematics and Learning in Papua New Guinea”. In: Forgasz, H., Rivera, F. (eds) Towards Equity in Mathematics Education. Advances in Mathematics Education. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27702-3_40
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27702-3_40
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-27701-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-27702-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)