Skip to main content

Development of a Textural Acid Rock Drainage Index for Classifying Acid Formation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 10th International Congress for Applied Mineralogy (ICAM)

Abstract

Textural analyses are largely absent from predictive ARD (acid rock drainage) assessments despite the direct control of texture on acid formation. The objective of this study was to develop a simple method for textural evaluation termed the ARD Index (ARDI) in order to categorise the acid-forming potential of intact samples. The ARDI is intended for use alongside routine predictive geochemical and mineralogical analyses as part of a geochemistry–mineralogy–texture (GMT) approach. The ARD Index (ARDI) assessed iron–sulphide minerals individually by five categories A–E, specifically chosen based on the direct influence on acid formation. Parameters A, B and C (ranked from 0 to 10) examined contents, degree of alteration and morphology of sulphides, while parameters D and E (ranked from –5 to 10) evaluated the neutralising mineral content and the spatial relationship between acid-forming and neutralising minerals. Scores from each category were totaled with values 50–41 considered as extremely acid forming (EAF); 40–31 as acid forming (AF); 30–21 as potentially acid forming (PAF); 20–10 as not acid forming (NAF); 10–0 as NAF/ANC and –1 to –10 as having acid-neutralising capacity (ANC). The ARDI was most efficiently performed on both a meso-scale and micro-scale. Eighty-one samples from an abandoned lode-gold operations and an operational iron-oxide copper gold mine (located in Queensland, Australia) were used to evaluate the ARDI. Samples were mesotexturally grouped (A–Q) and in addition to ARDI evaluations, geochemically and mineralogically analysed through static tests, elemental microanalysis (EA) and quantitative X-ray diffractometry (QXRD). ARDI classification identified lode-Au samples as the most acid forming, with group J (quartz–pyrite) classified as EAF, group H (quartz–arsenopyrite–pyrite) as AF and group G (quartz–galena–sphalerite) as PAF. When used in conjunction with paste-pH and sulphide-sulphur values, classifications were largely in agreement with traditionally used net acid-producing-potential/net acid generating (NAPP/NAG) geochemical methods. This indicates that the ARDI has the potential to be used as a simple textural screening method in predictive ARD studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Egiebor, NO, and Oni B (2007): Acid rock drainage formation and treatment: a review. Asia Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering (2): 47–62.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Morin, KA, and Hutt NM (1998): Kinetic test and risk assessment for ARD. Presented at the 5th Annual British Columbia Metal Leaching and ARD Workshop, Vancover, British Columbia, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  3. The International Network for Acid Prevention (INAP) (2009): Global Acid Rock Drainage Guide (GARD Guide). http://www.gardguide.com/

  4. Plumlee, GS, and Nash, JT (1995): Geoenvironmental models of mineral deposits – fundamentals and applications. In: du Bray EA (editor): Preliminary Compilation of Descriptive Geoenvironmental Mineral Deposit Models, Open File Report (95-831) U.S Geological Survey: 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mills, C, and Robertson, A (1998): Acid Rock Drainage, EnviroMine, http://technology.infomine.com/enviromine/ard/home.htm

  6. Blowes, DW, and Jambor, JL (1990): The pore-water geochemistry and the mineralogy of the vadose zone of sulphide tailings, Waite Amulet, Quebec, Canada. Applied Geochemistry (5): 327–346.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Shaw, SC, Groat, LA, Jambor, JL, Blowes, DW, Hanton-Fong, CJ, and Stuparyk, RA (1998): Mineralogical study of base metal tailings with various sulphide contents, oxidized in laboratory columns and field lysimeters. Environmental Geology (33): 209–217.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Diehl, SF, Koenig, AE, Hageman, PL, Smith, KS, Fey, DL, and Lowers, HA (2007): From the micro to the macroscale: a textural and chemical perspective of characterising waste-rock material. In Proceedings of the 2007 Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration (SME) Annual Meeting and Exhibit, and the 109th National Western Mining Conference, Denver, Colorado. Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration Inc, United States: Preprint 07-021, pp16.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bonnici, N, Hunt, J, Walters, S, Berry, R, Kamenetsky, M, McMahon, C, and Nguyen, K (2009): Integrating meso- and micro-textural information into mineral processing: An example from the Ernest Henry Iron-Oxide Copper-Gold deposit, Queensland, Australia. In 41st Annual Meeting of the Canadian Mineral Processors, Ottawa, Ontario, Conference Proceedings. Canada: 259–278.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bowell, RJ, Rees, SB, and Parshley, JV (2000): Geochemical predictions of metal leaching and acid generation: geologic controls and baseline assessment. Geology and Ore Deposits: The great Basin and Beyond Proceedings (2): 799–823.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jambor, JL, Dutrizac, JE, Groat, LA, and Raudsepp, M (2002): Static tests of neutralisation potentials of silicate and aluminosilicate minerals. Environmental Geology (43): 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Parbhakar-Fox, AK, Edraki, M, Bradshaw, D, and Walters, S (2011): A new approach to integration of geochemistry, mineralogy and texture for improving prediction of acid metalliferous drainage from abandoned mines. 7th Australian Workshop on Acid and Metalliferous Drainage, Darwin, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Smith, L, and Beckie, R (2003): Hydrologic and geochemical transport processes in mine waste rocks. In: Jambor, JL, Blowes, DW, and Ritchie AIM (editors): Environmental Aspects of Mine Wastes. Short Course Series. (31) Mineralogical Association of Canada, Canada: 51–72.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jambor, JL (2003): Mine waste mineralogy. In: Jambor, JL, Blowes, DW, and Ritchie AIM (editors): Environmental Aspects of Mine Wastes. Short Course Series. (31) Mineralogical Association of Canada, Canada: 117–146.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anita Parbhakar-Fox .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Parbhakar-Fox, A., Edraki, M., Bradshaw, D., Walters, S. (2012). Development of a Textural Acid Rock Drainage Index for Classifying Acid Formation. In: Broekmans, M. (eds) Proceedings of the 10th International Congress for Applied Mineralogy (ICAM). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27682-8_61

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics