Skip to main content

Improving Parallel Local Search for SAT

  • Conference paper
Book cover Learning and Intelligent Optimization (LION 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 6683))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this work, our objective is to study the impact of knowledge sharing on the performance of portfolio-based parallel local search algorithms. Our work is motivated by the demonstrated importance of clause-sharing in the performance of complete parallel SAT solvers. Unlike complete solvers, state-of-the-art local search algorithms for SAT are not able to generate redundant clauses during their execution. In our settings, each member of the portfolio shares its best configuration (i.e., one which minimizes conflicting clauses) in a common structure. At each restart point, instead of classically generating a random configuration to start with, each algorithm aggregates the shared knowledge to carefully craft a new starting point. We present several aggregation strategies and evaluate them on a large set of problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hamadi, Y., Jabbour, S., Sais, L.: ManySAT: A Parallel SAT Solver. Journal on Satisfiability, Boolean Modeling and Computation, JSAT 6, 245–262 (2009)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Moskewicz, M.W., Madigan, C.F., Zhao, Y., Zhang, L., Malik, S.: Chaff: Engineering an Efficient SAT Solver. In: Proceedings of the 38th Design Automation Conference (DAC 2001), pp. 530–535 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bordeaux, L., Hamadi, Y., Zhang, L.: Propositional Satisfiability and Constraint Programming: A Comparative Survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 38(4) (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hoos, H.H., Stützle, T.: Local Search Algorithms for SAT: An Empirical Evaluation. J. Autom. Reasoning 24(4), 421–481 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Selman, B., Levesque, H.J., Mitchell, D.G.: A New Method for Solving Hard Satisfiability Problems. In: AAAI (ed.), pp. 440–446 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Selman, B., Kautz, H.A., Cohen, B.: Noise Strategies for Improving Local Search. In: AAAI, pp. 337–343 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  7. McAllester, D.A., Selman, B., Kautz, H.A.: Evidence for Invariants in Local Search. In: AAAI/IAAI, pp. 321–326 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Li, C.M., Huang, W.Q.: Diversification and Determinism in Local Search for Satisfiability. In: Bacchus, F., Walsh, T. (eds.) SAT 2005. LNCS, vol. 3569, pp. 158–172. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Hutter, F., Tompkins, D.A.D., Hoos, H.H.: Scaling and Probabilistic Smoothing: Efficient Dynamic Local Search for SAT. In: Van Hentenryck, P. (ed.) CP 2002. LNCS, vol. 2470, pp. 233–248. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Thornton, J., Pham, D.N., Bain, S., Ferreira Jr, V.: Additive versus Multiplicative Clause Weighting for SAT. In: McGuinness, D.L., Ferguson, G. (eds.) AAAI, pp. 191–196. AAAI Press/The MIT Press, San Jose, California, USA (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hoos, H.H.: An Adaptive Noise Mechanism for WalkSAT. In: AAAI/IAAI, pp. 655–660 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Li, C.M., Wei, W., Zhang, H.: Combining Adaptive Noise and Look-Ahead in Local Search. In: Marques-Silva, J., Sakallah, K.A. (eds.) SAT 2007. LNCS, vol. 4501, pp. 121–133. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Chrabakh, W., Wolski, R.: GridSAT: A System for Solving Satisfiability Problems Using a Computational Grid. Parallel Computing 32(9), 660–687 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang, W., Huang, Z., Zhang, J.: Parallel Execution of Stochastic Search Procedures on Reduced SAT Instances. In: Ishizuka, M., Sattar, A. (eds.) PRICAI 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2417, pp. 108–117. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Roli, A.: Criticality and Parallelism in Structured SAT Instances. In: Van Hentenryck, P. (ed.) CP 2002. LNCS, vol. 2470, pp. 714–719. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Roli, A., Blesa, M.J., Blum, C.: Random Walk and Parallelism in Local Search. In: Metaheuristic International Conference (MIC 2005), Vienna, Austria (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pham, D.N., Gretton, C.: gNovelty+ (v.2). In: Solver Description, SAT Competition 2009 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kroc, L., Sabharwal, A., Gomes, C.P., Selman, B.: Integrating Systematic and Local Search Paradigms: A New Strategy for MaxSAT. In: Boutilier, C. (ed.) IJCAI, Pasadena, California, pp. 544–551 (July 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hogg, T., Williams, C.P.: Solving the Really Hard Problems with Cooperative Search. In: AAAI, pp. 231–236 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Silva, D.L., Burke, E.K.: Asynchronous Cooperative Local Search for the Office-Space-Allocation Problem. INFORMS Journal on Computing 19(4), 575–587 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Selman, B., Kautz, H.A.: Domain-Independent Extensions to GSAT: Solving Large Structured Satisfiability Problems. In: IJCAI, pp. 290–295 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tompkins, D.A.D., Hoos, H.H.: UBCSAT: An Implementation and Experimentation Environment for SLS Algorithms for SAT and MAX-SAT. In: Hoos, H.H., Mitchell, D.G. (eds.) SAT 2004. LNCS, vol. 3542, pp. 306–320. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Hutter, F., Hoos, H.H., Leyton-Brown, K.: Tradeoffs in the Empirical Evaluation of Competing Algorithm Designs. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence (AMAI), Special Issue on Learning and Intelligent Optimization (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Arbelaez, A., Hamadi, Y. (2011). Improving Parallel Local Search for SAT. In: Coello, C.A.C. (eds) Learning and Intelligent Optimization. LION 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6683. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25566-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25566-3_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-25565-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-25566-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics