Abstract
One of the most intriguing dynamics in biological systems is the emergence of clustering, in the sense that individuals self-organize into separate agglomerations in physical or behavioral space. Several theories have been developed to explain clustering in, for instance, multi-cellular organisms, ant colonies, bee hives, flocks of birds, schools of fish, and animal herds. A persisting puzzle, however is the clustering of opinions in human populations, particularly when opinions vary continuously, such as the degree to which citizens are in favor of or against a vaccination program. Existing continuous opinion formation models predict “monoculture” in the long run, unless subsets of the population are perfectly separated from each other. Yet, social diversity is a robust empirical phenomenon, although perfect separation is hardly possible in an increasingly connected world. Considering randomness did not overcome the theoretical shortcomings so far. Small perturbations of individual opinions trigger social influence cascades that inevitably lead to monoculture, while larger noise disrupts opinion clusters and results in rampant individualism without any social structure. Our solution of the puzzle builds on recent empirical research, combining the integrative tendencies of social influence with the disintegrative effects of individualization. A key element of the new computational model is an adaptive kind of noise. We conduct computer simulation experiments demonstrating that with this kind of noise a third phase besides individualism and monoculture becomes possible, characterized by the formation of metastable clusters with diversity between and consensus within clusters. When clusters are small, individualization tendencies are too weak to prohibit a fusion of clusters. When clusters grow too large, however, individualization increases in strength, which promotes their splitting. In summary, the new model can explain cultural clustering in human societies. Strikingly, model predictions are not only robust to “noise” – randomness is actually the central mechanism that sustains pluralism and clustering.
This chapter reprints a previously published paper and should be cited as follows: M. Mäs, A. Flache, and D. Helbing (2010) Individualization as driving force of clustering phenomena in humans. PLoS Comput. Biol. 6(10), e1000959.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
E. Ben-Jacob, O. Schochet, A. Tenenbaum, I. Cohen, A. Czirok, T. Vicsek, Generic Modeling of Cooperative Growth-Patterns in Bacterial Colonies. Nature 368, 46–49 (1994)
R. Jeanson, C. Rivault, J.L. Deneubourg, S. Blanco, R. Fournier, C. Jost, G. Theraulaz, Self-organized aggregation in cockroaches. Anim. Behav. 69, 169–180 (2005)
J. Gautrais, C. Jost, G. Theraulaz, Key behavioural factors in a self-organised fish school model. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 45, 415–428 (2008)
M. Ballerini, N. Calbibbo, R. Candeleir, A. Cavagna, E. Cisbani, et al., Interaction ruling animal collective behavior depends on topological rather than metric distance: Evidence from a field study. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 1232–1237 (2008)
I.D. Couzin, J. Krause, N.R. Franks, S.A. Levin, Effective leadership and decision-making in animal groups on the move. Nature 433, 513–516 (2005)
Y. Iwasa, V. Andreasen, S.A. Levin, Aggregation in model ecosystems. 1. Perfect Aggregation. Ecol. Model 37, 287–302 (1987)
M. Moussaid, N. Perozo, S. Garnier, D. Helbing, G. Theraulaz, The walking behaviour of pedestrian social groups and its impact on crowd dynamics. PLoS One 5(4), e10047 (2010)
H.A. Makse, S. Havlin, H.E. Stanley, Modeling Urban-Growth Patterns. Nature 377, 608–612 (1995)
M. Batty, The size, scale, and shape of cities. Science 319, 769–771 (2008)
D.J. Watts, S.H. Strogatz, Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393, 440–442 (1998)
A.L. Barabasi, R. Albert, Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286, 509–512 (1999)
G. Palla, A.L. Barabasi, T. Vicsek, Quantifying social group evolution. Nature 446, 664–667 (2007)
D. Liben-Nowell, J. Kleinberg, Tracing information flow on a global scale using Internet chain-letter data. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 4633–4638 (2008)
M.E.J. Newman, Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 5200–5205 (2004)
F. Liljeros, C.R. Edling, L.A.N. Amaral, H.E. Stanley, Y. Aberg, The web of human sexual contacts. Nature 411, 907–908 (2001)
M.P. Fiorina, S.J. Abrams, Political polarization in the American public. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 11, 563–588 (2008)
P. DiMaggio, J. Evans, B. Bryson, Have Americans’ social attitudes become more polarized? Am. J. Sociol. 102, 690–755 (1996)
E.L. Glaeser, B.A. Ward, Myths and realities of American political geography. J. Econ. Perspect. 20, 119–144 (2006)
N.P. Mark, Culture and competition: Homophily and distancing explanations for cultural niches. Am. Sociol. Rev. 68, 319–345 (2003)
D. Lazer, et al., Computational Social Science. Science 323, 721–723 (2009)
F.J. Milliken, L.L. Martins, Searching for Common Threads: Understanding the Multiple Effects of Diversity in Organizational Groups. Acad. Manag. J. 21, 402–433 (1996)
P.C. Early, E. Mosakowski, Creating hybrid team cultures: an empirical test of transnational team functioning. Acad. Manag. J. 43, 26–49 (2000)
T.L. Friedman, The World is Flat. A brief history of the twenty-first century (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York, 2005)
M.J. Greig, The end of geography? Globalization, communication and culture in the international system. J. Conflict Res. 46, 225–243 (2002)
W.J. Sutherland, Parallel extinction risk and global distribution of languages and species. Nature 423, 276–279 (2003)
E. Durkheim, The Division of Labor in Society (The Free Press, New York, 1997 [1893])
U. Beck, in Reflexive Modernization. Politics, Tradition and Aestherics in the Modern Social Order, ed. by U. Beck, A. Giddens, S. Lash (Polity Press, Cambridge, 1994)
M. McPherson, L. Smith-Lovin, M.E. Brashears, Social isolation in America: Changes in core discussion networks over two decades. Am. Sociol. Rev. 71, 353–375; also consult the discussion on this article in Am. Sociol. Rev. 74, 4 (2006)
R.P. Abelson, in Contributions to Mathematical Psychology, ed. by N. Frederiksen, H. Gulliksen (Rinehart Winston, New York, 1964), pp. 142–160
M. McPherson, L. Smith-Lovin, J.M. Cook, Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 27, 415–444 (2001)
S. Aral, L. Muchnik, A. Sundararajan, Distinguishing influenced-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 21544–21549 (2009)
A. Nowak, J. Szamrej, B. Latané, From private attitude to public opinion: a dynamic theory of social impact. Psychol. Rev. 97, 362–376 (1990)
R. Hegselmann, U. Krause, Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence models. Analysis, and Simulation J. Artif. Soc. S 5 (2002)
G. Deffuant, S. Huet, F. Amblard, An individual-based model of innnovation diffusion mixing social value and individual benefit. Am. J. Soc. 110, 1041–1069 (2005)
R. Axelrod, The dissemination of culture - A model with local convergence and global polarization. J. Conflict Res. 41, 203–226 (1997)
M.W. Macy, J. Kitts, A. Flache, S. Benard, in Dynamic Social Network Modelling and Analysis, ed. by R. Breiger, K. Carley, P. Pattison (The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2003), pp. 162–173
A. Flache, M. Mäs, How to get the timing right? A computational model of how demographic faultlines undermine team performance and how the right timing of contacts can solve the problem. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory 14, 23–51 (2008)
Z. Krizan, R.S. Baron, Group polarization and choice-dilemmas: How important is self-categorization? Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 37, 191–201 (2007)
M. Pineda, R. Toral, E. Hernandez-Garcia, Noisy continuous-opinion dynamics. J. Stat. Mech. P08001 (2009)
M.J. Hornsey, J. Jetten, The individual within the group: Balancing the need to belong with the need to be different. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 8, 248–264 (2004)
V.L. Vignoles, X. Chryssochoou, G.M. Breakwell, The distinctiveness principle: Identity, meaning, and the bounds of cultural relativity. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 4, 337–354 (2000)
R. Imhoff, H.P. Erb, What motivates nonconformity? Uniqueness seeking blocks majority influence. Pers. Soc. Psychol. B 35, 309–320 (2009)
C.R. Snyder, H.L. Fromkin, Uniqueness. The Human Pursuit of Difference (Plenum Press, New York and London, 1980)
K. Klemm, V.M. Eguiluz, R. Toral, M.S. Miguel, Global culture: A noise-induced transition in finite systems. Phys. Rev. E 67, 045101(R) (2003)
H.E. Stanley, Introduction to Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena (Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York, 1971)
W. Weidlich, The statistical description of polarization phenomena in society. Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 24, 251–266 (1971)
T.M. Liggett, Interacting Particle Systems (Springer, New York, 1985)
K. Sznajd-Weron, J. Sznajd, Opinion Evolution in Closed Community. Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 11, 1157–1165 (2000)
S. Galam, Heterogeneous beliefs, segregation, and extremism in the making of public opinions. Phys. Rev. E 71, 46123 (2005)
L. Behera, F. Schweitzer, On spatial consensus formation: Is the Sznajd model different from a voter model? International Journal of Modern Physics C 14(10), 1331–1354 (2003)
E. Bonabeau, Agent-based modeling: Methods and techniques for simulating human systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 7280–7287 (2002)
E. Durkheim, Suicide. A study in Sociology (The Free Press, New York, 1997 [1897])
Acknowledgements
We thank Tobias Stark, Heiko Rauhut, Jacob G. Foster and Michael Macy as well as the members of the Norms and Networks cluster at the Department of Sociology at the University of Groningen and the members of the Cooperative Relations and Social Networks Seminar at the Department of Sociology at Utrecht University for their constructive comments.
Author Contributions Conceived and designed the experiments: MM AF DH. Performed the experiments: MM. Analyzed the data: MM. Wrote the paper: MM AF DH.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Helbing, D. (2012). Opinion Formation. In: Helbing, D. (eds) Social Self-Organization. Understanding Complex Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24004-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24004-1_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-24003-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-24004-1
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)