Abstract
The modeling of complex systems such as ecological or socio-economic systems can be very challenging. Although various modeling approaches exist, they are generally not compatible and mutually consistent, and empirical data often do not allow one to decide what model is the right one, the best one, or most appropriate one. Moreover, as the recent financial and economic crisis shows, relying on a single, idealized model can be very costly. This contribution tries to shed new light on problems that arise when complex systems are modeled. While the arguments can be transferred to many different systems, the related scientific challenges are illustrated for social, economic, and traffic systems. The contribution discusses issues that are sometimes overlooked and tries to overcome some frequent misunderstandings and controversies of the past. At the same time, it is highlighted how some long-standing scientific puzzles may be solved by considering non-linear models of heterogeneous agents with spatio-temporal interactions. As a result of the analysis, it is concluded that a paradigm shift towards a pluralistic or possibilistic modeling approach, which integrates multiple world views, is overdue. In this connection, it is argued that it can be useful to combine many different approaches to obtain a good picture of reality, even though they may be inconsistent. Finally, it is identified what would be profitable areas of collaboration between the socio-economic, natural, and engineering sciences.
This chapter reprints a previous publication to be cited as: D. Helbing, Pluralistic Modeling of Complex System. Science and Culture 76(9/10), 399–417 (2010).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
A. Comte, Social Physics: From the Positive Philosophy (Calvin Blanchard, New York, 1856)
A. Comte, Course on Positive Philosophy (1830–1842)
D. Helbing, Grand socio-economic challenges, Working Paper, ETH Zurich (2010)
L.C. Bollinger, Announcing the Columbia committee on global thought, see http://www.columbia.edu/content/announcing-columbia-committee-global-thought.html, last accessed on March 6, 2012
H. Spencer, The Principles of Sociology (Appleton, New York, 1898; the three volumes were originally published in serial form between 1874 and 1896)
L. von Bertalanffy, General System Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications (George Braziller, New York, 1968)
J.M. Epstein, Generative Social Science. Studies in Agent-Based Computational Modeling (Princeton University, 2006), p. 51
I.D. Mayergoyz, Mathematical Models of Hysteresis and their Applications (Academic Press, 2003)
H.E. Stanley Introduction to Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena (Oxford University, 1987)
E.C. Zeeman (ed.), Catastrophe Theory (Addison-Wesley, London, 1977)
H.G. Schuster, W. Just, Deterministic Chaos (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2005)
W. Horsthemke, R. Lefever, Noise-Induced Transitions: Theory and Applications in Physics, Chemistry, and Biology (Springer, Berlin, 1983)
“KISS principle” at Wikipedia.org, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KISS_principle, last accessed on March 6, 2012
A. Einstein, “On the Method of Theoretical Physics”. The Herbert Spencer Lecture, delivered at Oxford (10 June 1933); also published in Philosophy of Science 1(2), p. 165 (April 1934).
G.E.P. Box, N.R. Draper, Empirical Model-Building and Response Surfaces (Wiley, NJ, 1987), pp. 74+424
D. Helbing, Derivation of non-local macroscopic traffic equations and consistent traffic pressures from microscopic car-following models. Eur. Phys. J. B 69(4), 539–548 (2009), see also http://www.soms.ethz.ch/research/traffictheory
D. Helbing, Traffic and related self-driven many-particle systems. Rev.Mod. Phys. 73, 1067–1141 (2001)
F. Galton, Vox populi. Nature 75, 450–451 (1907)
D. Helbing, et al., see collection of publications on analytical traffic flow theory at http://www.soms.ethz.ch/research/traffictheory, last accessed on March 6, 2012
J.M. Epstein, Why model? J Artif. Soc. Soc. Simulat. 11(4), 12 (2008). see http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/11/4/12.html
P.A. Davidson, Turbulence (Cambridge University, Cambridge, 2004)
W. Weidlich, Sociodynamics: A Systemic Approach to Mathematical Modelling in the Social Sciences (Dover, 2006)
J.H. Kagel, A.E. Roth, The Handbook of Experimental Economics (Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 1995)
F. Guala, The Methodology of Experimental Economics (Cambridge University Press, New York, 2005)
D. Helbing, W. Yu (2010) The future of social experimenting. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA (PNAS) 107(12), 5265–5266; see also http://www.soms.ethz.ch/research/socialexperimenting
O. Maimon, L. Rokach, The Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Handbook (Springer, Berlin, 2005)
M.O. Jackson, Social and Economic Networks (Princeton University, Princeton, 2008)
N. Gilbert (ed.), Computational Social Science (Sage, CA, 2010)
J.H. Miller, S.E. Page, Complex Adaptive Systems: An Introduction to Computational Models of Social Life (Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 2007)
D. Sornette, Critical Phenomena in Natural Sciences. Chaos, Fractals, Selforganization and Disorder: Concepts and Tools (Springer, Berlin, 2006)
S. Albeverio, V. Jentsch, H. Kantz (eds.), Extreme Events in Nature and Society (Springer, Berlin, 2005)
D. Floreano, C. Mattiussi, Bio-Inspired Artificial Intelligence: Theories, Methods, and Technologies (MIT, Cambridge, MA, 2008)
S. Nolfi, D. Floreano, Evolutionary Robotics : The Biology, Intelligence, and Technology of Self-Organizing Machines (MIT, Cambridge, MA, 2000)
D. Helbing, A. Deutsch, S. Diez, K. Peters, Y. Kalaidzidis, K. Padberg, S. Lämmer, A. Johansson, G. Breier, F. Schulze, M. Zerial, Biologistics and the struggle for efficiency: Concepts and perspectives. Adv. Complex Syst. 12(6), 533–548 (2009)
D. Helbing, System risks in society and economics. Sante Fe Institute Working Paper #09-12-044 (2009). See http://www.santafe.edu/media/workingpapers/09-12-044.pdf, last accessed on March 6, 2012
M. Moussaid, S. Garnier, G. Theraulaz, D. Helbing, Collective information processing and pattern formation in swarms, flocks, and crowds. Top. Cognit. Sci. 1(3), 469–497 (2009)
D. Helbing, A. Szolnoki, M. Perc, G. Szabó, Evolutionary establishment of moral and double moral standards through spatial interactions. PLoS Comput. Biol. 6(4), e1000758 (2010)
K.R. Popper, The Logic of Scientific Discovery (Hutchinson, 1959); original German version: Logik der Forschung (Springer, Vienna, 1935)
D. Tilman, D. Wedin, J. Knops, Productivity and sustainability influenced by biodiversity in grassland ecosystems. Nature 379, 718–720 (1996)
A. Traulsen, D. Semmann, R.D. Sommerfeld, H.-J. Krambeck, M. Milinski, Human strategy updating in evolutionary games. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (PNAS) 107(7), 2962–2966 (2010)
E. Brockfeld, R.D. Kühne, P. Wagner, Calibration and validation of microscopic traffic flow models. Transport. Res. Board 1876, 62–70 (2004)
A. Kesting, M. Treiber, Calibrating car-following models by using trajectory data: Methodological study. Transport. Res. Record 2088, 148–156 (2008)
K. Gödel, On Formally Undecidable Propositions of Principia Mathematica and Related Systems (Basic, New York, 1962)
J. Lorenz, H. Rauhut, F. Schweitzer, D. Helbing, How social influence undermines the wisdom of crowds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (PNAS) 108(22), 9020–9025 (2011)
M. Planck: “An important scientific innovation rarely makes its way by gradually winning over and converting its opponents, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it.”
T.S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (University of Chicago, Chicago, 1962)
T. Vicsek, The bigger picture. Nature 418, 131 (2002)
L. Pietronero, Complexity ideas from condensed matter and statistical physics. europhysicsnews 39(6), 26–29
A.S. Mikhailov, V. Calenbuhr, From Cells to Societies. Models of Complex Coherent Action (Springer, Berlin, 2002)
R.A. Bentley, P. Ormerod, Agents, intelligence, and social atoms, in Creating Consilience: Integrating the Sciences and the Humanities, ed. by M. Collard, E. Slingerland (Oxford University Press, 2011)
H. Gintis, The Bounds of Reason: Game Theory and the Unification of the Behavioral Sciences (Princeton University, Princeton, 2009)
P. Omerod, What can agents know? The feasibility of advanced cognition in social and economic systems. In Proceedings of the AISB 2008 Convention on Communication, Interaction and Social Intelligence 6 (Aberdeen, Scotland, 2008), pp. 17–20
E. Fehr, K.M. Schmidt, A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Q. J. Econ. 114(3), 817–868 (1999)
B. Frey, Economics as a Science of Human Behaviour: Towards a New Social Science Paradigm (Kluwer Academics, Dordrecht, 1999)
D. Kahneman, A. Tversky, Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2), 263–291 (1979)
H.A. Simon, A behavioral model of rational choice. Q. J. Econ. 69(1), 99–118 (1955)
G. Gigerenzer, P.M. Todd, and the ABC Research Group, Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart (Oxford University, New York, 2000)
D. McFadden, Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour, in Frontiers of Econometrics, ed. by P. Zarembka (Academic Press, New York, 1974), pp. 105–142
D. Helbing, Quantitative Sociodynamics. Stochastic Methods and Models of Social Interaction Processes (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1995)
P. Woit, Not Even Wrong: The Failure of String Theory and the Search for Unity in Physical Law for Unity in Physical Law (Basic, New York, 2006)
L. Smolin, The Trouble With Physics: The Rise of String Theory, The Fall of a Science, and What Comes Next (Mariner, Boston, 2007)
J. Rotmans, M.B.A. van Asselt, Uncertainty management in integrated assessment modeling: Towards a pluralistic approach. Environ. Monit. Assess. 69(2), 101–130 (2001)
D. Dubois, H. Prade, Possibilistic logic: a retrospective and prospective view. Fuzzy Set. Syst. 144(1), 3–23 (2004)
V. Lucarini, Towards a definition of climate science. Int. J. Environ. Pollut. 18(5), 413–422 (2002)
A. Vespignani, Predicting the behavior of techno-social systems. Science 325, 425–428 (2009)
D. Helbing, The FuturIcT knowledge accelerator: Unleashing the power of information for a sustainable future, Project Proposal (2010), see http://arxiv.org/abs/1004.4969 and http://www.futurict.eu, last accessed on March 6, 2012
Acknowledgements
The author is grateful for support by the ETH Competence Center “Coping with Crises in Complex Socio-Economic Systems” (CCSS) through ETH Research Grant CH1-01 08-2 and by the Future and Emerging Technologies programme FP7-COSI-ICT of the European Commission through the project Visioneer (grant no.: 248438).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Helbing, D. (2012). Modeling of Socio-Economic Systems. In: Helbing, D. (eds) Social Self-Organization. Understanding Complex Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24004-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24004-1_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-24003-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-24004-1
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)