Skip to main content

E-Government Information Quality: A Case Study of Thailand

  • Conference paper
Electronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective (EGOVIS 2011)

Abstract

E-government information quality model is proposed. The model suggests that there are five groups of information quality dimensions that should be considered when assessing the quality of information provided by e-government for citizens. These five groups of information quality dimensions are: Availability, Objectivity, Utility, Integrity, and Confidentiality. Nineteen Thai ministry websites were surveyed based on the proposed e-government information quality model. It was found that the availability and confidentiality of information seem to get lower attention from Thai ministries, this might make citizens feel less confident in e-government.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ho, A.T.: Reinventing Local Governments and the E-Government Initiative. Public Administration Review 62(4), 434–444 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Moon, M.J.: The Evolution of E-Government among Municipalities: Rhetoric or Reality. Public Administration Review 62(4), 424–433 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Accenture: Building the Trust (2006), http://www.accenture.com/xdoc/en/industries/government/acn_2006_govt_report_FINAL2.pdf

  4. Wang, Y.: A Study on the Problems of E-government in China. International Journal of Business and Management 2(6), 106–107 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hilary, M., David, S.H.: Ethical Problems for e-Government: An Evaluative Framework. Electronic Journal of e-Government 2(3), 187–196 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mohammad, R.S., Alexander, R.: Information Systems Planning for E-Government in Indonesia. In: The Second International Conference on Innovations in Information Technology (IIT 2005), pp. 1–10 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Stahl, B.: The Ethical Problem of Framing e-Government in Terms of e-Commerce. The Electronic Journal of e-Government 3(2), 77–86 (2005)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Yufeng, C., Fei, T.: The Problems in the Implementation of e-Government Administration, the Analysis and Strategies. Communications of the ACM, 529–531 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Philip, L.: Legal Issues in E-government (2002), http://lri.jur.uva.nl/~winkels/eGov2002/Leith.pdf

  10. Science Daily.: Privacy Problems and E-Government (2009), http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/05/090517152601.htm

  11. Danish, D.: The Failure of E-Government in Developing Countries: A Literature Review. The Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries 26(7), 1–10 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Vassilios, P., Gregoris, M., Konstantinos, A.T., Andreas, A.: Transforming E-government and E-participation through IT. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 14–19 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wand, Y., Wang, R.Y.: Anchoring Data Quality Dimensions in Ontological Foundations. Communications of the ACM 39(11), 86–95 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Naumann, F.: Information Quality Criteria. In: Naumann, F. (ed.) Quality-Driven Query Answering for Integrated Information Systems. LNCS, vol. 2261, pp. 29–50. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Pipino, L.L., Lee, Y.W., Wang, R.Y.: Data Quality Assessment. Communications of the ACM 45(2), 211–218 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. IT Governance Institute: COBIT 4.1. IT Governance Institute, Illinois (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bolten, B.J.: Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review. Executive Office of the President, pp. 1–45. Office of Management and Budget, Washington D.C (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Office of Management and Budget: Guidelines for Ensuring and Maximizing the Quality, Objectivity, Utility, and Integrity of Information Disseminated by Federal Agencies (2007), http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/fedreg/reproducible.html

  19. Office of Management and Budget: Office of Management and Budget Information Quality Guidelines (2007), http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/inforeg/iqg_oct2002.pdf

  20. Central Sponsor for Information Assurance: e-Government Framework for Information Assurance (2007), http://www.govtalk.gov.uk/documents/ai_framework(1).pdf

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Funilkul, S., Chutimaskul, W., Chongsuphajaisiddhi, V. (2011). E-Government Information Quality: A Case Study of Thailand. In: Andersen, K.N., Francesconi, E., Grönlund, Å., van Engers, T.M. (eds) Electronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective. EGOVIS 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6866. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22961-9_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22961-9_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-22960-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-22961-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics