Skip to main content

Semantic Distance Measures with Distributional Profiles of Coarse-Grained Concepts

  • Chapter
Modeling, Learning, and Processing of Text Technological Data Structures

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 370))

Abstract

Although semantic distance measures are applied to words in textual tasks such as building lexical chains, semantic distance is really a property of concepts, not words. After discussing the limitations of measures based solely on lexical resources such as WordNet or solely on distributional data from text corpora, we present a hybrid measure of semantic distance based on distributional profiles of concepts that we infer from corpora. We use only a very coarse-grained inventory of concepts—each category of a published thesaurus is taken as a single concept—and yet we obtain results on basic semantic-distance tasks that are better than those of methods that use only distributional data and are generally as good as those that use fine-grained WordNet-based measures. Because the measure is based on naturally occurring text, it is able to find word pairs that stand in non-classical relationships not found in WordNet. It can be applied cross-lingually, using a thesaurus in one language to measure semantic distance between words in another. In addition, we show the use of the method in determining the degree of antonymy of word pairs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Banerjee, S., Pedersen, T.: Extended gloss overlaps as a measure of semantic relatedness. In: Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 805–810 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beigman Klebanov, B.: Semantic relatedness: Computational investigation of human data. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Midwest Computational Linguistics Colloquium, Urbana-Champaign, USA (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bernard, J. (ed.): The Macquarie Thesaurus. Macquarie Library, Sydney, Australia (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Budanitsky, A., Hirst, G.: Evaluating WordNet-based measures of semantic distance. Computational Linguistics 32(1), 13–47 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Charles, W.G., Miller, G.A.: Contexts of antonymous adjectives. Applied Psychology 10, 357–375 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dagan, I.: Contextual word similarity. In: Dale, R., Moisl, H., Somers, H. (eds.) Handbook of Natural Language Processing, pp. 459–475. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gurevych, I.: Using the structure of a conceptual network in computing semantic relatedness. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, Jeju Island, Republic of Korea, pp. 767–778 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hirst, G., Budanitsky, A.: Correcting real-word spelling errors by restoring lexical cohesion. Natural Language Engineering 11, 87–111 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hirst, G., St-Onge, D.: Lexical chains as representations of context for the detection and correction of malapropisms. In: Fellbaum, C. (ed.) WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database, ch. 13, pp. 305–332. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jarmasz, M., Szpakowicz, S.: Roget’s Thesaurus and semantic similarity. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing (RANLP 2003), pp. 212–219 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jiang, J.J., Conrath, D.W.: Semantic similarity based on corpus statistics and lexical taxonomy. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Research in Computational Linguistics (ROCLING X), Taiwan, pp. 19–33 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Justeson, J.S., Katz, S.M.: Cooccurrences of antonymous adjectives and their contexts. Computational Linguistics 17, 1–19 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Leacock, C., Chodorow, M.: Combining local context and WordNet similarity for word sense identification. In: Fellbaum, C. (ed.) WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database, ch. 11, pp. 265–283. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Li, J., Hirst, G.: Semantic knowledge in a word completion task. In: Proceedings, 7th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, Baltimore, MD (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lin, D.: Automatic retrieval and clustering of similar words. In: Proceedings of the 36th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING- ACL 1998), pp. 768–774 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lin, D.: An information-theoretic definition of similarity. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 296–304 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Miller, G.A., Charles, W.G.: Contextual correlates of semantic similarity. Language and Cognitive Processes 6(1), 1–28 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mohammad, S.: Measuring semantic distance using distributional profiles of concepts. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mohammad, S., Hirst, G.: Distributional measures as proxies for semantic relatedness (2005), http://ftp.cs.toronto.edu/pub/gh/Mohammad+Hirst-2005.pdf

  20. Mohammad, S., Hirst, G.: Determining word sense dominance using a thesaurus. In: Proceedings of the 11th conference of the European chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL 2006), Trento, Italy, pp. 121–128 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mohammad, S., Hirst, G.: Distributional measures of concept-distance: A task-oriented evaluation. In: Proceedings, 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP 2006), Sydney, Australia (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mohammad, S., Gurevych, I., Hirst, G., Zesch, T.: Cross-lingual distributional profiles of concepts for measuring semantic distance. In: 2007 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning (EMNLP-CoNLL 2007), Prague (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mohammad, S., Hirst, G., Resnik, P.: TOR, TORMD: Distributional profiles of concepts for unsupervised word sense disambiguation. In: SemEval-2007: 4th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluations, Prague (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mohammad, S., Dorr, B., Hirst, G.: Computing word-pair antonymy. In: 2008 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP 2008), Waikiki, Hawaii (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Morris, J., Hirst, G.: Lexical cohesion computed by thesaural relations as an indicator of the structure of text. Computational Linguistics 17(1), 21–48 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Morris, J., Hirst, G.: Non-classical lexical semantic relations. In: Workshop on Computational Lexical Semantics, Human Language Technology Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Boston, MA (2004): reprinted in: Hanks, P.(editor), Lexicology: Critical Concepts in Linguistics, Routledge (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Patwardhan, S., Banerjee, S., Pedersen, T.: Using measures of semantic relatedness for word sense disambiguation. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics, pp. 241–257 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Resnik, P.: Using information content to evaluate semantic similarity. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Montreal, Canada, pp. 448–453 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rubenstein, H., Goodenough, J.B.: Contextual correlates of synonymy. Communications of the ACM 8(10), 627–633 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Weeds, J.E.: Measures and applications of lexical distributional similarity. PhD thesis, University of Sussex (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wu, Z., Palmer, M.: Verb semantics and lexical selection. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Las Cruces, New Mexico, pp. 133–138 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hirst, G., Mohammad, S. (2011). Semantic Distance Measures with Distributional Profiles of Coarse-Grained Concepts. In: Mehler, A., KĂĽhnberger, KU., Lobin, H., LĂĽngen, H., Storrer, A., Witt, A. (eds) Modeling, Learning, and Processing of Text Technological Data Structures. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 370. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22613-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22613-7_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-22612-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-22613-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics