Skip to main content

Towards a Dialectical Approach for Conversational Agents in Selling Situations

  • Conference paper
Book cover Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems (ArgMAS 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6614))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 647 Accesses

Abstract

The use of virtual agents to intelligently interface with online customers of e-commerce businesses is remarkably increasing. Most of these virtual agents are designed to assist online customers while searching for information related to a specific product or service, while few agents are intended for promoting and selling a product or a service. Within the later type, our aim is to provide proactive agents that recommend a specific item and justify this recommendation to a customer based on his purchases history and his needs. In this paper, we propose a dialectical argumentation approach that would allow virtual agents that have sales goals to trigger persuasions with e-commerce’s customers. Then, we illustrate the proposed idea through its integration with an example from real-life.

Categories and Subject Descriptors

I.2.11 [Artificial Intelligence:] Intelligent Agents.

General Terms: Algorithms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hof, R., Green, H., Himmelstein, L.: Now it’s YOUR WEB. BusinessWeek, 68–75 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Poong, Y., Zaman, K.-U., Talha, M.: E-commerce today and tomorrow: a truly generalized and active framework for the definition of electronic commerce. In: Proc. of the 8th International Conference on Electronic Commerce (ICEC), pp. 553–557. ACM, Fredericton (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Palopoli, L., Rosaci, D., Ursino, D.: Agents’ roles in B2C e-commerce. AI Communications 19, 95–126 (2006)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Wooldridge, M., Jennings, N.: Intelligent agents: Theory and practice. Knowledge Engineering Review 10, 115–152 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Isbister, K., Doyle, P.: Design and evaluation of embodied conversational agents: A proposed taxonomy. In: Proc. of the First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS), Budapest, Hungary (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rist, T., André, E., Baldes, S., Gebhard, P., Klesen, M., Rist, P., Schmitt, M.: A review of the development of embodied presentation agents and their application fields. In: Life-Like Characters – Tools, Affective Functions, and Applications, pp. 377–404. Springer (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Morge, M.: The hedgehog and the fox. In: Rahwan, I., Parsons, S., Reed, C. (eds.) Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4946, pp. 114–131. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Morge, M., Mancarella, P.: Assumption-based argumentation for the minimal concession strategy. In: McBurney, P., Rahwan, I., Parsons, S., Maudet, N. (eds.) ArgMAS 2009. LNCS, vol. 6057, pp. 114–133. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Roberts, F., Gülsdorff, B.: Techniques of dialogue simulation. In: Pelachaud, C., Martin, J.-C., André, E., Chollet, G., Karpouzis, K., Pelé, D. (eds.) IVA 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4722, pp. 420–421. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Ferguson, J.A.G.: Mixed-initiative systems for collaborative problem solving. AI Magazine 28, 23–32 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rich, C., Sidner, C.L., Lesh, N.: COLLAGEN applying collaborative discourse theory to human-computer interaction. AI Magazine 22, 15–25 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sadek, D.: Artemis Rational Dialogue Agent Technology: An Overview. In: Multi-Agent Programming, pp. 217–225. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Grosz, B.J., Sidner, C.L.: Plans for Discourse. In: Cohen, Morgan, Pollack (eds.) Intentions and Plans in Communication and Discourse. MIT press, Cambridge (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rao, A.S., Georgeff, M.P.: Modeling rational agents within a BDI-architecture. In: Proc. of the 2nd International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR), pp. 473–484. Morgan Kaufmann publishers Inc., San Mateo (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  15. C, F.T.: FIPA ACL Communicative Act Library Specification. Component, Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents (2002), http://fipa.org/specs/fipa00037/

  16. Breiter, P.: La communication orale coopérative : contribution à la modélisation et à la mise en œuvre d’un agent rationnel dialoguant. PhD thesis, Université de Paris Nord (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hamblin, C.L.: Fallacies. Methuen (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Walton, D., Krabbe, E.: Commitment in Dialogue. SUNY Press (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Prakken, H.: Formal systems for persuasion dialogue. The Knowledge Engineering Review 21, 163–188 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Amgoud, L., Cayrol, C.: On the acceptability of arguments in preference-based argumentation. In: Proc. of UAI, pp. 1–7. Morgan Kaufmann, Wisconsin (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artif. Intell. 77, 321–357 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Amgoud, L., Prade, H.: Using arguments for making and explaining decisions. Artificial Intelligence Journal 173(3-4), 413–436 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Bench-Capon, T., Prakken, H.: Justifying actions by accruing arguments. In: Proc. of the 1st International Conference on Computational Models of Argument, pp. 247–258. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kakas, A., Moraitis, P.: Argumentative-based decision-making for autonomous agents. In: Proc. of AAMAS, pp. 883–890. ACM Press, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gartner, D., Toni, F.: CaSAPI: a system for credulous and sceptical argumentation. In: Proc. of ArgNMR, pp. 80–95 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  26. García, A.J., Simari, G.R.: Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming 4(2), 95–138 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Demetriou, N., Kakas, A.C.: Argumentation with abduction. In: Proc. of the 4th Panhellenic Symposium on Logic (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Morge, M., Abdel-Naby, S., Beaufils, B. (2011). Towards a Dialectical Approach for Conversational Agents in Selling Situations. In: McBurney, P., Rahwan, I., Parsons, S. (eds) Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. ArgMAS 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6614. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21940-5_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21940-5_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21939-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21940-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics