Abstract
Comprehensive reasoning from end to means requires an initiating intention to bring about some goal, along with five premisses: a specified means would immediately contribute to realization of the goal, the goal is achievable, the means is permissible, no alternative means is preferable, and the side effects do not outweigh the benefits of achieving the goal. Its conclusion is a decision to bring about the means. The scheme can be reiterated until an implementable means is reached. In a particular context, resource limitations may warrant truncation of the reasoning.
ACM Category: I.2.11 Multiagent systems. General terms: Theory.
Keywords
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Hansen, J., Sato, M., Kharecha, P., Beerling, D., Berner, R., Masson-Delmotte, V., Pagani, M., Raymo, M., Royer, D.L., Zachos, J.C.: Target atomspheric CO2: Where should humanity aim? The Open Atmosphere. Science Journal 2, 217–231 (2008); doi:10.2174/1874282300802010217
Girle, R., Hitchcock, D., McBurney, P., Verheij, B.: Decision support for Practical Reasoning. In: Reed, C., Norman, T.J. (eds.) Argumentation Machines: New Frontiers in Argumentation and Computation, vol. 9, pp. 55–83. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2004)
Anscombe, E.: Intention, 2nd edn. Blackwell, Oxford (1963)
Richardson, H.S.: Practical Reasoning about Final Ends. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1994)
Ihnen, C.: Evaluating pragmatic argumentation: A pragma-dialectical perspective. In: Van Eemeren, F.H., Garssen, B., Godden, D., Mitchell, G. (eds.) Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Argumentation of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, SICSAT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (forthcoming)
Weirich, P.: Causal decision theory. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2010), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2010/entries/decision-causal/
Habermas, J.: The Theory of Communicative Action, vol. 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society, Heinemann, London, UK (1984); Translation by T. McCarthy of: Theorie des Kommunikativen Handelns, Band I, Handlungsrationalität und gesellschaftliche Rationalisierung, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt, Germany (1981)
Laudan, L.: Aim-less epistemology? Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 21, 315–322 (1990)
Tracy, K., Coupland, N.: Multiple goals in discourse: an overview of issues. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 9, 1–13 (1990)
Perelman, C., Olbrechts-Tyteca, L.: The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame (1969); Translation of la Nouvelle Rhétorique. Traité de l’argumentation. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris (1958)
Walton, D.N.: Argument Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah (1996)
Kock, C.: Is practical reasoning presumptive? Informal Logic 27, 91–108 (2007)
Aristotle: The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation. vol. 1, 2, edited by J. Barnes. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1984)
Hume, D.: A Treatise of Human Nature: Being an Attempt to Introduce the Experimental Method of Reasoning into Moral Subjects (1739-1740), http://socserv.mcmaster.ca/econ/ugcm/3ll3/hume/treat.html (retrieved)
Bratman, M.E.: Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1987); Reprinted in 1999 by CSLI, Stanford
Searle, J.R.: Rationality in Action. MIT Press, Cambridge (2001)
Castelfranchi, C., Paglieri, F.: The role of beliefs in goal dynamics: prolegomena to a constructive theory of intentions. Synthese 155, 237–263 (2007)
Eminem: Careful what you wish for lyrics (2008), http://www.metrolyrics.com/careful_what_you_wish_for_lyrics_eminem.html (retrieved)
Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T.J.M.: Practical reasoning as presumptive argumentation using action based alternating transition systems. Artificial Intelligence 171, 855–874 (2007); doi:10.1016/j.artint.2007.04.009
Pollock, J.L.: Cognitive Carpentry: A Blueprint for How to Build a Person. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)
Hitchcock, D.: Pollock on practical reasoning. Informal Logic 22, 247–256 (2002)
Gert, B.: Morality: Its Nature and Justification. Revised edn. Oxford University Press, New York (2005)
Kant, I.: Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals. Yale University Press, New Haven (2002); Translator and Editor: A. W. Wood. Originally Published (1785, 1786)
Walton, D., Reed, C., Macagno, F.: Argumentation Schemes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008)
Walton, D.N.: Practical Reasoning: Goal-Driven, Knowledge-Based, Action-Guiding Argumentation. Rowman and Littlefield, Savage (1990)
Simon, H.A.: Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review 63, 129–138 (1956)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hitchcock, D. (2011). Instrumental Rationality. In: McBurney, P., Rahwan, I., Parsons, S. (eds) Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. ArgMAS 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6614. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21940-5_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21940-5_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21939-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21940-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)