Skip to main content

Ultrasound-Assisted Abdominal Liposuction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cosmetic Surgery
  • 6261 Accesses

Abstract

In 2000, Sound Surgical Technologies LLC of Louisville, Colorado, introduced a third-generation ultrasound device for assisted lipoplasty called Vaser, an acronym for vibration amplification of sound energy at resonance. The Vaser console consists of an integrated system including all the elements required for flow rate-controlled infiltration of tumescent fluid, tissue-selective destruction of fat, negative pressure aspiration, and collection of fat in disposable canisters. The technique is described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. The American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery: cosmetic surgery national databank statistics 2009. ASAPS website www.surgery.org (accessed in 2011)

  2. Flynn TC, Coleman WP III, Field LM, Klein JA, Hanke CW (2000) History of liposuction. Dermatol Surg 26(6):515–520

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Coldiron BM, Healy C, Bene NI (2008) Office surgery incidents: what seven years of Florida data show us. Dermatol Surg 34(3):285–291

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Housman TS, Lawrence N, Mellen BG, George MN, Filippo JS, Cerveny KA, DeMarco M, Feldman SR, Fleischer AB (2002) The safety of liposuction: results of a national survey. Dermatol Surg 28(11):971–978

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Coleman WP III, Hanke CW, Lillis P, Bernstein G, Narins R (1999) Does the location of the surgery or the specialty of the physician affect malpractice claims in liposuction? Dermatol Surg 25(5):343–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hanke CW, Lee MW, Bernstein G (1990) The safety of dermatologic liposuction surgery. Dermatol Clin 8(3):563–568

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fischer A, Fischer G (1976) First surgical treatment for molding body’s cellulite with three 5 mm incisions. Bull Int Acad Cosm Surg 3:35–37

    Google Scholar 

  8. Klein JA (1987) The tumescent technique for liposuction surgery. Am J Cosm Surg 4:236–267

    Google Scholar 

  9. Grippaudo F, Matarese M, Macone A, Mazzocchi M, Scuderi N (2000) Effects of traditional and ultrasonic ­liposuction on adipose tissue: a biochemical approach. Plast Reconstr Surg 106(1):197–199

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zocchi ML (1999) Basic physics for ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty. Clin Plast Surg 26(2):209–220

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Grolleau JL, Rouge D, Chavoin JP, Costagliola M (1997) Severe cutaneous necrosis after ultrasound lipolysis: medicolegal aspects and review. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 42(1):31–36

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fodor PB (2004) Personal experience with ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty: a pilot study comparing ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty with traditional lipoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 113(6):1852–1854

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. De Souza Pinto EB, Abdala PC, Maciel CM, dos Santos F de P, de Souza RP (2006) Liposuction and VASER. Clin Plast Surg 33(1):107–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Garcia O Jr, Nathan N (2008) Comparative analysis of blood loss in suction-assisted lipoplasty and third-generation internal ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty. Aesthet Surg J 28(4):430–435

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cimino WW (2006) VASER-assisted lipoplasty: technology and technique. In: Shiffman MA, Di Giuseppe A (eds) Lipo­suction principles and practice. Springer, Berlin, pp 239–244

    Google Scholar 

  16. Prendergast PM (2010) Liposculpture of the abdomen in an office-based practice. In: Shiffman MA, Di Giuseppe A (eds) Body contouring: art, science, and clinical practice. Springer, Berlin, pp 219–237

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ostad A, Kageyama N, Moy RL (1996) Tumescent anesthesia with a lidocaine dose of 55 mg/kg is safe for ­liposuction. Dermatol Surg 22(11):921–927

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Yang CH, Hsu HC, Shen SC, Juan WH, Hong HS, Chen CH (2006) Warm and neutral tumescent anesthetic solutions are essential factors for a less painful injection. Dermatol Surg 32(9):1119–1122

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sattler G, Sattler S (2007) Physiodynamic concept of tumescence. In: Hanke CW, Sattler G, Sommer B (eds) Textbook of liposuction. Informa Healthcare, Boca Raton, Florida, p 43, 5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Jewell ML, Fodor PB, de Souza Pinto EB, Al Shammari MA (2002) Clinical application of VASER-assisted lipoplasty: a pilot clinical study. Aesthet Surg J 22(2):131–146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Master course in VASER liposculpture: European College of Aesthetic Medicine (ECAM). Website www.ecamedicine.com (accessed in 2011)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter M. Prendergast .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Prendergast, P.M. (2013). Ultrasound-Assisted Abdominal Liposuction. In: Shiffman, M., Di Giuseppe, A. (eds) Cosmetic Surgery. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21837-8_55

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21837-8_55

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21836-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21837-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics