Skip to main content

Coordination in Innovation Projects

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Many empirically based studies support a positive connection between cross-functional cooperation and successful innovation. In this context, the existing literature mainly points to the interplay between the two key functional areas of research and development (R&D) and marketing (Griffin and Hauser 1996; Moenaert et al. 1994). The integration of production (Olson et al. 2001; Kahn 2001; Song et al. 1998) and purchasing (Wijinstra and Stekelenborg 1996) are, however, increasingly mentioned as also being critical for the realisation of innovation projects. The more recent discussion on integrated product development (Bullinger et al. 1995) shifts the focus to an overall understanding of the various functional areas, which at times make considerable contributions to the success of an innovation project. From this perspective, there appears to be a need for a higher level of integration and coordination in innovation projects. This is seen as necessary to ensure that the results of individual work packages are aligned to the overall objective of a project and that the implementation of the product development process is effective and efficient (Lawrence and Lorsch 1986; Rueckert and Walker 1987). Consequently, we are faced with the question of which mechanisms can be used to best meet coordination needs in innovation projects. Based on an in-depth study of three innovation projects, our chapter attempts to answer this question. We will first give an overview of diverse aspects of coordination in innovation projects. For this purpose, five dimensions of coordination are derived from organisational theory. Furthermore, a coordination model for innovative projects is developed to serve as a basis for our empirical study: a comparative case study analysis conducted in the electronics and automotive supply industries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen, T. J. (1977). Managing the flow of technology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. (1992). Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 634–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailetti, A. J., Callahan, J. R., & McCluskey, S. (1998). Coordination at different stages of the product design process. R&D Management, 28(4), 237–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benkenstein, M. (1987a). F&E und Marketing – Eine Untersuchung zur Leistungsfähigkeit von Koordinationskonzeptionen bei Innovationsentscheidungen. Wiesbaden: Gabler. (In German.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Benkenstein, M. (1987b). Koordination von Forschung & Entwicklung und Marketing. Marketing – Zeitschrift für Forschung und Praxis, 2, 123–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockhoff, K. (1996). Schnittstellenprobleme: Sechs Fälle aus der Wirtschaftspresse. In K. Brockhoff (Ed.), Management von Innovationen (pp. 203–206). Wiesbaden: Gabler. (In German.)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brockhoff, K., & Hauschild, J. (1993). Schnittstellen-Management – Koordination ohne Hierarchie. Zeitschrift für Führung und Organisation, 62(6), 396–403. (In German.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Buggie, F. D. (2001). The four phases of innovation. Journal of Business Strategy, 22(5), 36–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullinger, H. J., Kugel, R., Ohlhausen, P., Stanke, A., et al. (1995). Integrierte Produktentwicklung – zehn erfolgreiche Praxisbeispiele. Wiesbaden: Gabler. (In German.)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, K. B., & Fujimoto, T. (1991). Product development performance. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnellon, A. (1993). Crossfunctional teams in product development: Accommodation the structure to the process. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 10, 377–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlenspiel, K. (1995). Integrierte Produktentwicklung: Methoden für die Prozess-organisation, Produkterstellung und Konstruktion. München/Wien: Hanser. (In German.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Euringer, C. (1995). Marktorientierte Produktentwicklung: Die Interaktion zwischen F&E und Marketing. Wiesbaden: Gabler. (In German.)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Folkerts, L., & Hauschild, J. (2002). Personelle Dynamik in Innovationsprozessen – Neue Fragen und Befunde zum Promotorenmodell. Die Betriebswirtschaft, 62(1), 7–23. (In German.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Frese, E. (1988). Grundlagen der Organisation, 4. durchgesehene Auflage. Wiesbaden: Gabler. (In German.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Früh, W. (1998). Inhaltsanalyse: Theorie und Praxis, 4. überarbeitete Auflage. Konstanz: UVK Medien. (In German.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gemünden, H. G., & Högl, M. (1998). Teamarbeit in innovativen Projekten: Eine kritische Bestandsaufnahme der empirischen Forschung. Zeitschrift für Personalforschung, 12(3), 277–301. (In German.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerpott, H. (1991). F&E und Produktion, Theoretische und empirische Analysen zu Schnittstellenproblemen im Innovationsprozess unter besonderer Berücksichtigung personalwirtschaftlicher Aspekte. München: VVF. (In German.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, S. G., Gavin, M. B., & Aiman-Smith, L. (1995). Assessing a multidimensional measure of radical technological innovation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 42(3), 203–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, A., & Hauser, J. R. (1992). Patterns of communication among marketing, engineering and manufacturing: A comparison between two new product teams. Management Science, 38(3), 361–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, A., & Hauser, J. R. (1996). Integrating R&D and marketing: A review and analysis of the literature. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13, 191–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. K., & Wilemon, D. (1988). Why R&D resists using marketing information. Research-Technology Management, 31(Nov./Dec.), 36–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. K., Raj, S. P., & Wilemon, D. (1986). A model for studying R&D-Marketing interface in the product innovation process. Journal of Marketing, 50, 7–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauschildt, J. (1991). Zur Messung des Innovationserfolges. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, 61(4). (In German.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauschildt, J., & Petersen, K. (1987). Phasen-Theorem und Organisation komplexer Entscheidungsverläufe – weiterführende Untersuchungen. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, 39, 1043–1062. (In German.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Herstatt, C., & Verworn, B. (2003). Bedeutung und Charakteristika der frühen Phasen des Innovationsprozesses. In C. Herstatt & B. Verworn (Eds.), Management der frühen Innovationsphasen (pp. 3–15). Wiesbaden: Gabler. (In German.)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hugl, U. (1995). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse und Mindmapping: Ein neuer Ansatz für Datenauswertung und Organisationsdiagnose. Wiesbaden: Gabler. (In German.)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, K. B. (1996). Interdepartmental Integration: A definition with implications for product development performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13, 137–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, K. B. (2001). Market orientation, interdepartmental integration and product development performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18, 314–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson, C., & Ahlström, P. (1996). The difficult path to lean product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13, 283–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kieser, A., & Kubicek, H. (1992). Organisation, 3. neu bearbeitete Auflage. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter. (In German.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Knickel, V. (1997). Gestaltung von Kommunikationsprozessen an Schnittstellen in der Produktentwicklung. In G. Warnecke (Ed.), Produktionstechnische Berichte. Band 26. Kaiserslautern: Universität Kaiserslautem. (In German.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Köhler, R. (1992). Absatzorganisation. In E. Frese (Ed.), Enzyklopädie der Betriebswirtschaftslehre, Bd. 2: Handwörterbuch der Organisation, 3. Aufl. (pp. 36–56). Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel. (In German.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Küpper, H. C. (1981). Ablauforganisation. In F. X. Bea, E. Dichtl, & M. Schweitzer (Eds.), Grundwissen der Ökonomik. Stuttgart/New York: Fischer. (In German.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1986). Organization and environment: managing differentiation and integration. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lechler, T. (1996). Erfolgsfaktoren des projektmanagements. Peter Lang: Frankfurt am Main. (In German.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Leenders, M. A. A. M., & Wierenga, B. (2002). The effectiveness of different mechanisms for integrating marketing & R&D. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19, 305–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, G. H., & Bush, A. J. (1988). The marketing-R&D interface: Do personality factors have an impact? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 5, 257–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lühring, N. (2003). Innovationsfördernde Organisationsstrukturen unter Berücksichtigung früher Innovationsphasen. In C. Herstatt, & B. Verworn (Eds.), Management der frühen Innovationsphasen (pp. 117–144). Wiesbaden: Gabler. (In German.)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lühring, N. (2006). Koordination von Innovationsprojekten. Wiesbaden: DUV. (In German.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Maltz, E. (2000). Is all communication created equal? An investigation into the effects of communication mode on perceived information quality. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 17, 110–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maltz, E., Souder, W. E., & Kumar, A. (2001). Influencing R&D/Marketing integration and the use of market information by R&D managers: intended and unintended effects of managerial actions. Journal of Business Research, 52, 69–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manns, J. R. (1992). Produktinnovation als Ergebnis der Koordination von F&E und Marketing. Ursachen, Auswirkungen und Lösungsmöglichkeiten, dargestellt am Beispiel eines Unternehmens der mobilen Kommunikation. Ludwigsburg/Berlin: Verlag Wissenschaft & Praxis. (In German.)

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonough, E. F., III, Kahn, K. B., & Barczak, G. (2001). An investigation of the use of global, virtual, and colocated new product development teams. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18, 110–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moenaert, R. K., & Souder, W. E. (1990). An information transfer model for integrating marketing and R&D personnel in new product development projects. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 7(2), 91–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moenaert, R. K., Souder, W. E., DeMeyer, A., & Deschoolmeester, D. (1994). R&D marketing integration mechanisms, communication flows and innovation success. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 11, 31–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nijssen, E. J., Biemans, W. G., & de Kort, J. F. (2002). Involving purchasing in new product development. R&D Management, 32(4), 281–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nobeoka, K. (1995). Reorganizing for Multi-Project management: Toyota's new structure of product development centers. In Kobe Economic & Business Review, 40 th Annual Report. Kobe University: Research Institute for Economics and Business Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, E. M., Walker, O. C., Ruekert, R. W., & Bonner, J. M. (2001). Patterns of cooperation during new product development among marketing, operations and R&D: Implications for project performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18, 258–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osterloh, M., & Frost, J. (2000). Von der Strukturgestaltung zur Prozessorganisation. Überlegungen zur Koordinations-, Orientierungs- und Motivationsdimension der Organisation. In M. K. Welge, A. Al-Laham, & P. Kajüter (Eds.), Praxis des strategischen Managements: Konzepte – Erfahrungen – Perspektiven (pp. 279–294). Wiesbaden: Gabler. (In German.)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Picot, A., Reichwald, R., & Wigand, R. T. (2001). Die grenzenlose Unternehmung, 4. Auflage. Wiesbaden: Gabler. (In German.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, M. B., Pinto, J. K., & Prescott, J. E. (1993). Antecedents and consequences of project cross-functional cooperation. Management Science, 10, 1281–1297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reger, G. (1997). Koordination und strategisches Management internationaler Innovationsprozesse. Bamberg: Difo-Druck. (In German.)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rueckert, R. W., & Walker, O. C. (1987). Marketing's interaction with other functional units: A conceptual framework and empirical evidence. Journal of Marketing, 51(Jan), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rühli, E. (1992). Koordination. In E. Frese (Ed.), Handwörterbuch der Organisation, 3. Auflage (pp. 1164–1175). Stuttgart: Poeschel. (In German.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomo, S., Gemünden, H. G., & Billing, F. (2003). Dynamisches Schnittstellenmanagement radikaler Innovationsvorhaben. In C. Herstatt, & B. Verworn (Eds.), Management der frühen Innovationsphasen (pp. 161–194). Wiesbaden: Gabler. (In German.)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, R. (1996). Der Interface-Check als Analyse der organisatorischen Schnittstelle “F&E und Marketing”. JFB, 1, 4–22. (In German.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, J. B., & Calantone, R. J. (2002). Escalation of commitment during new product development. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30(2), 103–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, D. J. G., & Müller, M. E. (1993). Durch Koordination zu marktgerechten Innovationen. Schnittstellengestaltung zwischen F&E und Marketing. Marktforschung & Management, 1, 6–13. (In German.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidel, M. (1996). Zur Steigerung der Marktorientierung der Produktentwicklung – Analyse der Interaktion zwischen F&E und Marketing im Innovationsprozess. Dissertation. St. Gallen: Universität St. Gallen. (In German.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sethi, R. (2000). New product quality and product development teams. Journal of Marketing, 64(April), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Chicago/London: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanteau, J., & Rohrbaugh, C. (2000). Social/psychological barriers to successful management of technological innovation. In B. Green, R. Cressy, & F. Delmar (Eds.), Risk behaviour and risk management in business life. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, V., & Shaw, C. T. (1998). Conflict between engineers and marketers. Industrial Marketing Management, 27, 279–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, J. D., Souder, W. E., & Jenssen, S. A. (2000). Differential effects of the primary forms of cross functional integration on product development cycle time. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 17, 257–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silber, H. (1986). Innovation durch Querschnittskoordination. Zeitschrift für Führung und Organisation, 4, 243–251. (In German.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommerlatte, T. (1988). Visionen des Wandels. In A. D. Little (Ed.), Management des geordneten Wandels (pp. 19–36). Wiesbaden: Gabler. (In German.)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sommerlatte, T. (2000). Längerfristige Zukunftssicherung durch Innovationsmanagement. In K. Steinle et al. (Eds.), Vitalisierung: Das Management der neuen Lebendigkeit (pp. 192–206). FAZ: Frankfurt am Main. (In German.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, X. M., & Parry, M. E. (1997). Teamwork barriers in Japanese high technology firms: The socio-cultural difference between R&D and marketing managers. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 14(5), 356–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, X. M., Montoya-Weiss, M. M., & Schmidt, J. B. (1997). Antecedents and consequences of cross-functional cooperation: A comparison of R&D, manufacturing and marketing perspectives. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 14, 35–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, X. M., Thieme, R. J., & Xie, J. (1998). The impact of cross-functional joint involvement across product development stages: An exploratory study. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15, 289–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Souder, W. E. (1988). Managing relations between R&D and marketing in new product development projects. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 5, 6–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Specht, G. (2000). Schnittstellenmanagement: Marketing und Forschung & Entwicklung. In A. Hermann et al. (Eds.), Kundenorientierte Produktgestaltung (pp. 267–285). München: Vahlen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staehle, W. H. (1999). Management, 8. Auflage. München: Vahlen. (In German.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Staudt, E., Mühlemeyer, P., & Kriegesmann, B. (1991). Schnittstelle = Bruchstelle? Absatzwirtschaft, 11, 108–114. (In German.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Steven, M. (2001). Die Koordination im Unternehmen. WISU, 7, 965–970. (In German.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuffer, R. (1994). Planung und Steuerung der Integrierten Produktentwicklung. München/Wien: Hanser. (In German.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Thom, N. (1980). Grundlagen des betrieblichen Innovationsmanagements, 2. völlig neu bearbeitete Auflage. Hanstein: Königstein/Ts. (In German.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Thom, N., & Etienne, M. (2000). Organisatorische und personelle Aspekte für ein erfolgreiches Innovationsmanagement. In A. Clermont, W. Schmeisser, & D. Krimphove (Eds.), Personalführung und Organisation (pp. 283–294). München: Vahlen. (In German.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Trott, P. (1998). Innovation management and new product development. London: Financial Times Pitman Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, K. T., & Eppinger, S. D. (1995). Product design and development. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiebecke, G., & Tschirky, H. (1987). Interface zwischen Forschung + Entwicklung und Marketing. io Management Zeitschrift, 56(1), 23–26. (In German.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wijinstra, F. J. Y., & van Stekelenborg, R. H. A. (1996). The role of purchasing in new product development. Eindhoven: University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkler, T. (1999). Entwicklung eines Instrumentariums zur Erfolgsanalyse von Innovationsprojekten. Frankfurt am Main: Lang. (In German.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfrum, B. (1994). Schnittstellenprobleme zwischen F&E und Marketing im Innovationsmanagement. WISU, 12, 1016–1022. (In German.)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Norbert Lühring .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Herstatt, C., Lühring, N. (2012). Coordination in Innovation Projects. In: Melkas, H., Harmaakorpi, V. (eds) Practice-Based Innovation: Insights, Applications and Policy Implications. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21723-4_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics