Abstract
The marvel of embryonic stem (ES) cells is that after in vitro culturing and genetic modification, they still have the ability to contribute to the developing embryo, when combined with pre-implantation embryos, to produce chimeras and even completely ES cell-derived animals. In this chapter, we will describe three methods for combining ES cells with embryos: the injection of ES cells into blastocysts, the injection of ES cells into eight-cell stage embryos and aggregation of ES cells with morulae. To date, blastocyst injection is the most commonly used method, adopted by core facilities rather than individual laboratories, partially because of the high cost of equipment and long training period required, prohibitive to some labs. The Injection of eight-cell stage embryos can be performed using the same equipment, but because fewer cells are injected per embryo this method is faster and can be learned quickly by anyone trained in blastocyst injection. The procedure makes use of less expensive outbred embryo donor mice and produces completely ES cell-derived mice when good quality ES cells are used. Morula aggregation is performed under a simple dissecting stereomicroscope, thereby lowering the startup costs, and requires a shorter training period. Although the procedure utilizes less expensive outbred strains of mice as embryo donors, the savings are partially offset by the need for larger numbers of transferred embryos per female due to the lower implantation rate of the zona pellucida (ZP) free embryos. On the other hand, morula aggregations are much faster and easier to perform than microinjections and similar to eight-cell microinjections they often result in fully ES cell-derived animals.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- CM:
-
Compacted Morulae
- dpc:
-
Days post coitum
- DIC:
-
Differential interference contrast optics
- ES Cells:
-
Embryonic stem cells
- HMC:
-
Hoffman modulation contrast optics
- ICM:
-
Inner cell mass
- PVP:
-
Polyvinylpyrrolidone
- SW:
-
Swiss Webster
- ZP:
-
Zona pellucida
References
Nagy A, Rossant J (2001) Chimaeras and mosaics for dissecting complex mutant phenotypes. Int J Dev Biol 45(3):577–582
Tam PP, Rossant J (2003) Mouse embryonic chimeras: tools for studying mammalian development. Development 130(25):6155–6163
Tarkowski AK (1961) Mouse chimaeras developed from fused eggs. Nature 190:857–860
Mintz B (1962) Experimental study of the developing mammalian egg: removal of the Zona Pellucida. Science (New York, NY) 138(3540):594–595
Gardner RL (1968) Mouse chimeras obtained by the injection of cells into the blastocyst. Nature 220(5167):596–597
Moustafa LA, Brinster RL (1972) Induced chimaerism by transplanting embryonic cells into mouse blastocysts. J Exp Zool 181(2):193–201
Babinet C (1980) A simplified method for mouse blastocyst injection. Exp Cell Res 130(1):15–19
Lallemand Y, Brulet P (1990) An in situ assessment of the routes and extents of colonisation of the mouse embryo by embryonic stem cells and their descendants. Development 110(4):1241–1248
Tajbakhsh S, Bober E, Babinet C, Pournin S, Arnold H, Buckingham M (1996) Gene targeting the myf-5 locus with nlacZ reveals expression of this myogenic factor in mature skeletal muscle fibres as well as early embryonic muscle. Dev Dyn 206(3):291–300
Stewart CL (1993) Production of chimeras between embryonic stem cells and embryos. Meth Enzymol 225:823–855
Tokunaga T, Tsunoda Y (1992) Efficacious production of viable germ-Line chimeras between embryonic stem (ES) cells and 8-cell stage embryos. Dev Growth Differ 34(5):561–566
Yagi T, Tokunaga T, Furuta Y, Nada S, Yoshida M, Tsukada T, Saga Y, Takeda N, Ikawa Y, Aizawa S (1993) A novel ES cell line, TT2, with high germline-differentiating potency. Anal Biochem 214(1):70–76
Poueymirou WT, Auerbach W, Frendewey D, Hickey JF, Escaravage JM, Esau L, Dore AT, Stevens S, Adams NC, Dominguez MG, Gale NW, Yancopoulos GD, DeChiara TM, Valenzuela DM (2007) F0 generation mice fully derived from gene-targeted embryonic stem cells allowing immediate phenotypic analyses. Nat Biotechnol 25(1):91–99
Eggan K, Akutsu H, Loring J, Jackson-Grusby L, Klemm M, Rideout WM 3rd, Yanagimachi R, Jaenisch R (2001) Hybrid vigor, fetal overgrowth, and viability of mice derived by nuclear cloning and tetraploid embryo complementation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98(11):6209–6214
Huang J, Deng K, Wu H, Liu Z, Chen Z, Cao S, Zhou L, Ye X, Keefe DL, Liu L (2008) Efficient production of mice from embryonic stem cells injected into four- or eight-cell embryos by piezo micromanipulation. Stem Cells Dayton OH 26(7):1883–1890
Stewart C (1980) Aggregation between teratocarcinoma cells and preimplantation mouse embryos. J Embryol Exp Morphol 58:289–302
Stewart CL (1982) Formation of viable chimaeras by aggregation between teratocarcinomas and preimplantation mouse embryos. J Embryol Exp Morphol 67:167–179
Nagy A, Gocza E, Diaz EM, Prideaux VR, Ivanyi E, Markkula M, Rossant J (1990) Embryonic stem cells alone are able to support fetal development in the mouse. Development 110(3):815–821
Wood SA, Allen ND, Rossant J, Auerbach A, Nagy A (1993) Non-injection methods for the production of embryonic stem cell-embryo chimaeras. Nature 365(6441):87–89
Khillan JS, Bao Y (1997) Preparation of animals with a high degree of chimerism by one-step coculture of embryonic stem cells and preimplantation embryos. Biotechniques 22(3):544–549
Saburi S, Azuma S, Sato E, Toyoda Y, Tachi C (1997) Developmental fate of single embryonic stem cells microinjected into 8-cell-stage mouse embryos. Differ Res Biol Divers 62(1):1–11
Doetschman TC, Eistetter H, Katz M, Schmidt W, Kemler R (1985) The in vitro development of blastocyst-derived embryonic stem cell lines: formation of visceral yolk sac, blood islands and myocardium. J Embryol Exp Morphol 87:27–45
Voss AK, Thomas T, Gruss P (1997) Germ line chimeras from female ES cells. Exp Cell Res 230(1):45–49
Nagy A, Rossant J, Nagy R, Abramow-Newerly W, Roder JC (1993) Derivation of completely cell culture-derived mice from early-passage embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90(18):8424–8428
Stewart CL, Kaspar P, Brunet LJ, Bhatt H, Gadi I, Kontgen F, Abbondanzo SJ (1992) Blastocyst implantation depends on maternal expression of leukaemia inhibitory factor. Nature 359(6390):76–79
Eggan K, Rode A, Jentsch I, Samuel C, Hennek T, Tintrup H, Zevnik B, Erwin J, Loring J, Jackson-Grusby L, Speicher MR, Kuehn R, Jaenisch R (2002) Male and female mice derived from the same embryonic stem cell clone by tetraploid embryo complementation. Nat Biotechnol 20(5):455–459
Longo L, Bygrave A, Grosveld FG, Pandolfi PP (1997) The chromosome make-up of mouse embryonic stem cells is predictive of somatic and germ cell chimaerism. Transgen Res 6(5):321–328
Liu X, Wu H, Loring J, Hormuzdi S, Disteche CM, Bornstein P, Jaenisch R (1997) Trisomy eight in ES cells is a common potential problem in gene targeting and interferes with germ line transmission. Dev Dyn 209(1):85–91
Fedorov LM, Haegel-Kronenberger H, Hirchenhain J (1997) A comparison of the germline potential of differently aged ES cell lines and their transfected descendants. Transgen Res 6(3):223–231
Schwartzberg PL, Goff SP, Robertson EJ (1989) Germ-line transmission of a c-abl mutation produced by targeted gene disruption in ES cells. Sci NY NY 246(4931):799–803
Austin CP, Battey JF, Bradley A, Bucan M, Capecchi M, Collins FS, Dove WF, Duyk G, Dymecki S, Eppig JT, Grieder FB, Heintz N, Hicks G, Insel TR, Joyner A, Koller BH, Lloyd KC, Magnuson T, Moore MW, Nagy A, Pollock JD, Roses AD, Sands AT, Seed B, Skarnes WC, Snoddy J, Soriano P, Stewart DJ, Stewart F, Stillman B, Varmus H, Varticovski L, Verma IM, Vogt TF, von Melchner H, Witkowski J, Woychik RP, Wurst W, Yancopoulos GD, Young SG, Zambrowicz B (2004) The knockout mouse project. Nat Genet 36(9):921–924
Collins FS, Finnell RH, Rossant J, Wurst W (2007) A new partner for the international knockout mouse consortium. Cell 129(2):235
Hughes ED, Qu YY, Genik SJ, Lyons RH, Pacheco CD, Lieberman AP, Samuelson LC, Nasonkin IO, Camper SA, Van Keuren ML, Saunders TL (2007) Genetic variation in C57BL/6 ES cell lines and genetic instability in the Bruce4 C57BL/6 ES cell line. Mamm Genome 18(8):549–558
Auerbach W, Dunmore JH, Fairchild-Huntress V, Fang Q, Auerbach AB, Huszar D, Joyner AL (2000) Establishment and chimera analysis of 129/SvEv- and C57BL/6-derived mouse embryonic stem cell lines. Biotechniques 29(5):1024–1028, 1030, 1032
Ware CB, Siverts LA, Nelson AM, Morton JF, Ladiges WC (2003) Utility of a C57BL/6 ES line versus 129 ES lines for targeted mutations in mice. Transgen Res 12(6):743–746
Seong E, Saunders TL, Stewart CL, Burmeister M (2004) To knockout in 129 or in C57BL/6: that is the question. Trends Genet 20(2):59–62
Ward CM, Barrow KM, Stern PL (2004) Significant variations in differentiation properties between independent mouse ES cell lines cultured under defined conditions. Exp Cell Res 293(2):229–238
Hansen GM, Markesich DC, Burnett MB, Zhu Q, Dionne KM, Richter LJ, Finnell RH, Sands AT, Zambrowicz BP, Abuin A (2008) Large-scale gene trapping in C57BL/6N mouse embryonic stem cells. Genome Res 18(10):1670–1679
Brook FA, Gardner RL (1997) The origin and efficient derivation of embryonic stem cells in the mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94(11):5709–5712
Cheng J, Dutra A, Takesono A, Garrett-Beal L, Schwartzberg PL (2004) Improved generation of C57BL/6J mouse embryonic stem cells in a defined serum-free media. Genesis 39(2):100–104
Schoonjans L, Kreemers V, Danloy S, Moreadith RW, Laroche Y, Collen D (2003) Improved generation of germline-competent embryonic stem cell lines from inbred mouse strains. Stem Cells Dayton OH 21((1):90–97
Batlle-Morera L, Smith A, Nichols J (2008) Parameters influencing derivation of embryonic stem cells from murine embryos. Genesis 46(12):758–767
Ledermann B, Burki K (1991) Establishment of a germ-line competent C57BL/6 embryonic stem cell line. Exp Cell Res 197(2):254–258
Kontgen F, Suss G, Stewart C, Steinmetz M, Bluethmann H (1993) Targeted disruption of the MHC class II Aa gene in C57BL/6 mice. Int Immunol 5(8):957–964
Lemckert FA, Sedgwick JD, Korner H (1997) Gene targeting in C57BL/6 ES cells. Successful germ line transmission using recipient BALB/c blastocysts developmentally matured in vitro. Nucl Acids Res 25(4):917–918
Pacholczyk G, Suhag R, Mazurek M, Dederscheck SM, Koni PA (2008) Generation of C57BL/6 knockout mice using C3H x BALB/c blastocysts. Biotechniques 44(3):413–416
Schuster-Gossler K, Lee AW, Lerner CP, Parker HJ, Dyer VW, Scott VE, Gossler A, Conover JC (2001) Use of coisogenic host blastocysts for efficient establishment of germline chimeras with C57BL/6J ES cell lines. Biotechniques 31(5):1022–1024
Pettitt SJ, Liang Q, Rairdan XY, Moran JL, Prosser HM, Beier DR, Lloyd KC, Bradley A, Skarnes WC (2009) Agouti C57BL/6N embryonic stem cells for mouse genetic resources. Nat Meth 6(7):493–495
Ying QL, Wray J, Nichols J, Batlle-Morera L, Doble B, Woodgett J, Cohen P, Smith A (2008) The ground state of embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Nature 453(7194):519–523
Nichols J, Jones K, Phillips JM, Newland SA, Roode M, Mansfield W, Smith A, Cooke A (2009) Validated germline-competent embryonic stem cell lines from no obese diabetic mice. Nat Med 15(7):814–818
Silva J, Smith A (2008) Capturing pluripotency. Cell 132(4):532–536
Sato H, Amagai K, Shimizukawa R, Tamai Y (2009) Stable generation of serum- and feeder-free embryonic stem cell-derived mice with full germline-competency by using a GSK3 specific inhibitor. Genesis 47(6):414–422
Gertsenstein M, Nutter LM, Reid T, Pereira M, Stanford WL, Rossant J, Nagy A (2010) Efficient generation of germ line transmitting chimeras from C57BL/6N ES cells by aggregation with outbred host embryos. PLoS ONE 5(6):e11260
Kiyonari H, Kaneko M, Abe S, Aizawa S (2010) Three inhibitors of FGF receptor, ERK, and GSK3 establishes germline-competent embryonic stem cells of C57BL/6N mouse strain with high efficiency and stability. Genesis 48(5):317–327
Hooper M, Hardy K, Handyside A, Hunter S, Monk M (1987) HPRT-deficient (Lesch-Nyhan) mouse embryos derived from germline colonization by cultured cells. Nature 326(6110):292–295
Sibilia M, Wagner EF (1995) Strain-dependent epithelial defects in mice lacking the EGF receptor. Sci NY NY 269(5221):234–238
Threadgill DW, Dlugosz AA, Hansen LA, Tennenbaum T, Lichti U, Yee D, LaMantia C, Mourton T, Herrup K, Harris RC et al (1995) Targeted disruption of mouse EGF receptor: effect of genetic background on mutant phenotype. Sci NY NY 269(5221):230–234
Silva AJ, Simpson EM, Takahashi JS, Lipp H-P, Nakanishi S, Wehner JM, Giese KP, Tully T, Abel T, Chapman PF, Fox K, Grant S, Itohara S, Lathe R, Mayford M, McNamara JO, Morris RJ, Picciotto M, Roder J, Shin H-S, Slesinger PA, Storm DR, Stryker MP, Tonegawa S, Wang Y, Wolfer DP (1997) Mutant mice and neuroscience: recommendations concerning genetic background. Neuron 19(4):755–759
Parker-Thornburg JV, Alana JL, Smith CN, Detry M, Rojas ML, Baskin KK (2005) Cryopreserved morulae can be used to efficiently generate germline-transmitting chimeras by blastocyst injection. Transgen Res 14(5):685–690
Rossant J, Merentes-Diaz E, Gocza E, Ivanyi E, Nagy A (1991) Developmental potential of mouse embryonic stem cells. In: Bavister BD (ed) Serono symposium on preimplantation embryo development. Springer, NY, pp 157–165
Wang Z, Jaenisch R (2004) At most three ES cells contribute to the somatic lineages of chimeric mice and of mice produced by ES-tetraploid complementation. Dev Biol 275(1):192–201
De Repentigny Y, Kothary R (2010) Production of mouse chimeras by injection of embryonic stem cells into the perivitelline space of one-cell stage embryos. Transgen Res 19(6):1137–1144
Nagy A (2003) Manipulating the mouse embryo: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
Kondoh G, Yamamoto Y, Yoshida K, Suzuki Y, Osuka S, Nakano Y, Morita T, Takeda J (1999) Easy assessment of ES cell clone potency for chimeric development and germ-line competency by an optimized aggregation method. J Biochem Biophys Meth 39(3):137–142
Rulicke T, Haenggli A, Rappold K, Moehrlen U, Stallmach T (2006) No transuterine migration of fertilised ova after unilateral embryo transfer in mice. Reprod Fertil Dev 18(8):885–891
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Williams, E., Auerbach, W., DeChiara, T.M., Gertsenstein, M. (2011). Combining ES Cells with Embryos. In: Pease, S., Saunders, T. (eds) Advanced Protocols for Animal Transgenesis. Springer Protocols Handbooks. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20792-1_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20792-1_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-20791-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-20792-1
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols