Skip to main content

Climate-Based Decision Support Tools for Agriculture

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Challenges and Opportunities in Agrometeorology

Abstract

Farmers consider many variables in making agricultural decisions. The farmer must often choose his inputs for the production function before variables such as weather are known. The uncertainties associated with weather can however be mitigated with the use of decision support tools. As the specific relationships of weather, disease development and crop maturity are determined through research, the value of weather-based decision support tools becomes more evident. The State Climate Office of North Carolina (SCO) at North Carolina State University, USA has successfully developed several agricultural decision support systems. These include climate-based decision support tools for peanuts, strawberries, cucurbits, turfgrass and tobacco. All are built in collaboration with agricultural scientists who have expertise in each respective crop. Real-time and historical data from the North Carolina Environment and Climate Observing Network (ECONet) in conjunction with high-resolution numerical models support the availability of the tools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Cu RM, Phipps PM (1993) Development of a pathogen growth response model for the Virginia peanut leaf spot advisory program. Phytopathology 83:195–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doran JC, Fast JD, Barnard JC, Laskin A, Desyaterik Y, Gilles MK, Hopkins RJ (2008) Applications of lagrangian dispersion modeling to the analysis of changes in the specific absorption of elemental carbon. Atmos Chem Phys 8:1377–1389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fast JD, Easter RC (2006) A lagrangian particle dispersion model compatible with WRF. 7th WRF Users¹ Workshop, NCAR, Boulder, 19–22 June, p 6.2

    Google Scholar 

  • Grell GA, Dudhia J, Stauffer DR (1995) A description of the fifth generation penn state/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5). NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-398+STR, 122 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes GJ, Main CE, Keever TZ (1998) Forecasting long-distance movement of cucurbit downy mildew. In: Proceedings cucurbitaceae 1998, Pacific Grove, pp 186–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Langston DB, Phipps PM, Stipes RJ (2002) An algorithm for predicting outbreaks of sclerotinia blight of peanut and improving the timing of fungicide Sprays. Plant Dis 86:118–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nusbaum CJ (1944) The seasonal spread and development of cucurbit downy mildew in the Atlantic coastal states. Plant Dis 28:82–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Nusbaum CJ (1948) A summary of cucurbit downy mildew reports from Atlantic coastal states in 1947. Plant Dis 32:44–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Skamarock WC, Klemp JB, Dudhia J, Gill DO, Barker DM, Duda MG, Huang XY, Wang W, Powers JG (2008) A description of the advanced research WRF version 3. NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-475+STR, 113 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas CE (1996) Downy mildew. In: Zitter TA, Hopkins DL, Thomas CE (eds) Compendium of cucurbit diseases. APS Press, St. Paul, pp 25–27

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work mentioned herein is supported, in part, by the North Carolina Agricultural Research Service; Office of Extension, Engagement and Economic Development at NC State University; and the Center for Turfgrass Environmental Research and Education at NC State University. The authors would also like to acknowledge our collaborators: Dr. Barbara Shew, Department of Plant Pathology, NC State University; Dr. Gina Fernandez and Dr. Barclay Poling, Department of Horticulture, NC State University; Dr. George Kennedy and Dr. Hannah J. Burrack, Department of Entomology, NC State University; and Dr. Charles Peacock, Department of Crop Science, NC State University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark S. Brooks .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brooks, M.S., Sims, A.P., Frazier, A.N., Boyles, R.P., Syed, A., Raman, S. (2011). Climate-Based Decision Support Tools for Agriculture. In: Attri, S., Rathore, L., Sivakumar, M., Dash, S. (eds) Challenges and Opportunities in Agrometeorology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19360-6_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics