Skip to main content

Welfare Issues Associated with Ratite Husbandry Practices

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover The Welfare of Farmed Ratites

Part of the book series: Animal Welfare ((AWNS,volume 11))

Abstract

This chapter examines some of the methods being used to assess welfare in ratites, identifies the welfare issues associated with declawing and highlights concerns with stockperson skills and brooder house management. Partial amputation of the toes of ratites has welfare implications. It causes ratites acute pain; they become flatfooted and change their gait and they can slip and fall over in wet paddocks and handling areas. However, the blunting of the claws reduces the bird’s ability to deliver kicks and injuries to other birds during aggressive encounters and improves skin quality in the flock and reduces the potential for handlers suffering injuries. The role of handlers in ratite farming is examined. While there has been little research undertaken in the ratite industry on skills of stockpersons, work with other livestock shows that it is essential that animal handlers have the skills to look after their stock and develop a good affinity with their birds. Livestock which are housed in facilities with good air quality grow faster and consume more feed than animals exposed to poor air quality. Improving air quality in ratite brooding facilities could improve production and provide a better working environment for farm employees. It is clear that declawing of ratites, stockperson skills and housing have a major impact on welfare. The accreditation of persons practising declawing, the training of stockpersons in ratite handling and improvement in air quality in brooding and rearing facilities would result in a significant improvement in ratite welfare.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ajzen I (1988) Attitudes, personality and behaviour. Open University Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Al Homidan A, Robertson JF, Petchey AM (1998) Effect of environmental factors on ammonia and dust production and broiler performance. Br Poult Sci 39 (Supplement):S10

    Google Scholar 

  • Animal Welfare Advisory Committee (1998) Code of recommendations and minimum standards for the welfare of ostrich and emu. http://www.biosecurity.govt.nz/animal-welfare/codes/ostriches-emus/index.htm#1. Cited 18 June 2010

  • Anon (1992) Report on priorities for animal welfare research and development. Farm Animal Welfare Council, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Surbiton, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett J (1999) Evaluation of alternative egg laying production systems in Europe (August/September 1999) A Travel Report Presented to the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, Canberra, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett JL, Newman EA (1997) Review of the welfare research in the laying hen and the research and management implications for the Australian egg industry. Aust J Agric Res 48:385–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett JL, Glatz PC, Almond A, Hemsworth PH, Cransberg PH, Parkinson GB, Jongman EC (2001) A Welfare Audit for the Chicken Meat Industry. Report to the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, Canberra, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Blokhuis JH (1986) Feather pecking in poultry: its relation to ground pecking. Appl Anim Behav Sci 16:63–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blokhuis JH, Arkes JG (1984) Some observations on the development of feather pecking in poultry. Appl Anim Behav Sci 12:145–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blokhuis JH, Van Der Haar WJ (1989) Effects of floor type during rearing and of beak trimming on ground pecking and feather pecking in laying hens. Appl Anim Behav Sci 22:359–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blokhuis JH, Van Der Haar WJ (1992) Effects of pecking incentives during rearing on feather pecking of laying hens. Br Poult Sci 33:17–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Braastad BO (1990) Effects on behaviour and plumage of a key stimuli floor and a perch in triple cages for laying hens. Appl Anim Behav Sci 27:127–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brambell FWR, Barbour DS, Barnett MB, Ewer TK, Hobson A, Pitchforth H, Smith WR, Thorpe WH, Winship FJW (1965) Report of the Technical Committee to Enquire into the Welfare of Animals Kept Under Intensive Husbandry Systems. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Breuer K, Hemsworth PH, Barnett JL, Matthews LR, Coleman GJ (2000) Behavioural response to humans and the productivity of commercial dairy cows. Appl Anim Behav Sci 66:273–288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Breward J, Gentle MJ (1985) Neuroma formation and abnormal afferent nerve discharges after partial beak amputation (beak-trimming) in poultry. Experientia 41:1132–1135

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Broom DM (1986) Indicators of poor welfare. Br Vet J 142:524–526

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen JW, Nielsen BL (2004) Environmental enrichment for ostrich, Sruthio camelus, chicks. Anim Welf 13(2):119–124

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman GJ, Hemsworth PH, Hay M, Cox M (2000) Modifying stockpersons attitudes and behaviour towards pigs at a large commercial scale farm. Appl Anim Behav Sci 66:11–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman GJ, McGregor M, Hemsworth PH, Boyce J, Dowling S (2003) The relationship beliefs, attitudes and observed behaviours of abattoir personnel in the pig industry. Appl Anim Behav Sci 82:189–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Communities E (1998) Council Directive 98/58/EC of 20 July 1998 concerning the protection of animals kept for farming purposes. Off J L 221:23–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins MS (1980) Animal suffering: the science of animal welfare. Chapman and Hall, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins MS (1983) Battery hens name their price: consumer demand theory and the measurement of animal needs. Anim Behav 31:1195–1205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins MS (2003) Behaviour as a tool in the assessment of animal welfare. Zoology 106:383–387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan IJH (1970) Frustration in the fowl. In: Freeman BM, Gordon RF (eds) Aspects of poultry behaviour. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh, pp 15–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan IJH, Fraser D (1997) Understanding animal welfare. In: Appleby MC, Hughes BO (eds) Animal welfare. CAB International, Oxon, pp 19–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan IJH, Petherick JC (1989) Cognition: the implications for animal welfare. Appl Anim Behav Sci 24:81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan IJH, Wood-Gush DGM (1972) The analysis of displacement preening in the domestic fowl. Anim Behav 20:68–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feddes JJR, Taschuk K, Robinson FE, Riddell C (1995) Effect of litter oiling and ventilation rate on air quality, health and performance of turkeys. Can Agr Eng 37(1):57–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein M, Ajzen I (1975) Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2009) Capacity building to implement good animal welfare practices. Report of the FAO Expert Meeting, FAO Headquarters (Rome). ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/012/i0483e/i0483e00.pdf

  • Fraser D (2003) Assessing animal welfare at the farm and group level: the interplay of science and values. Anim Welf 12:433–443

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gentle MJ (1986) Neuroma formation following partial beak amputation (beak trimming) in the chicken. Res Vet Sci 41:383–385

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Glatz PC (2001a) Improving skin quality of emus and ostriches. A benchmark study of husbandry, transport, lairage and slaughter methods. Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation Publication No 01/04, ISBN 0 642 58227 0, ISSN 1440–6845

    Google Scholar 

  • Glatz PC (2001b) Effect of declawing on behaviour of farmed emus. Asian-Aust J Anim Sci 14:288–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Glatz PC (2008) Ratite toe-trimming-for ostriches and emus-Training manual. Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation Publication No 08/017, ISBN 1 74151 606 4, ISSN 1440–6845

    Google Scholar 

  • Glatz PC (2010) Husbandry and genetic strategies to improve hide quality of ostriches. Rural Research and Development Corporation Publication No 09/174, ISBN 1 74151971 3, ISSN 1440–6845

    Google Scholar 

  • Glatz PC, Miao ZH (2008) Husbandry of ratites and potential welfare issues: a review. Aust J Exp Agr 48(10):1257–1265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grigor PN, Hughes BO, Gentle MJ (1995) Should turkeys be trimmed? An analysis of the costs and benefits of different methods. Vet Rec 136:257–265

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harry EG (1978) Air pollution in farm building and methods of control: a review. Avi Pathol 7:441–454

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hayter RB, Besch EL (1974) Airborne-particle deposition in the respiratory tract of chickens. Poult Sci 53:1507–1511

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hemsworth PH (2003) Human-animal interactions in livestock production. Appl Anim Behav Sci 81:185–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemsworth PH, Coleman GJ (1998) Human–livestock interactions. The stockperson and the productivity and welfare of intensively farmed animals. CAB International, Wallingford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemsworth PH, Barnett JL, Matthews LR, Coleman GJ, Hansen C (1989) A study of the relationship between the attitudinal and behavioural profiles of stockpersons and the level of fear of humans and reproductive performance of commercial pigs. Appl Anim Behav Sci 23:301–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemsworth PH, Coleman GJ, Barnett JL, Borg S (2000) Relationships between human-animal interactions and productivity of commercial dairy cows. J Anim Sci 78:2821–2831

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hemsworth PH, Coleman GJ, Barnett JL, Borg S, Dowling S (2002) The effects of cognitive behavioural intervention on the attitude and behaviour of stockpersons and the behaviour and productivity of commercial dairy cows. J Anim Sci 80:68–78

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes BO, Grigor PN (1996) Behavioural time budgets and beak related behavior in floor housed turkeys. Anim Welf 5(2):189–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes BO, Michie W (1982) Plumage loss in medium bodied hybrid hens: The effect of beak trimming and cage design. Poult Sci 23:59–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ikeguchi A (2002) Ultra sonic sprayer controlling dust in experimental poultry houses. Agr Eng Int, Manuscript BC 01 002, Vol IV

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen TS, Krebs B, Nielsen J, Rasmussen P (1983) Phantom limb, phantom pain and stump pain in amputees during the first 6 months following limb amputation. Pain 17:243–256

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen TS, Krebs B, Nielsen J, Rasmussen P (1984) Non-painful phantom limb phenomena in amputees: incidence, clinical characteristics and temporal course. Acta Neurol Scand 70:407–414

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley KW, Brief S, Westly HJ, Novakofski J, Bechtel PJ, Simon J, Walker ER (1987) Hormonal regulation of the age-associated decline in immune function. Ann NY Acad Sci 496:91–97

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kemeny DM (2000) The effects of pollutants on the allergic immune response. Toxicology 152(1–3):3–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kristensen HH, Burgess LR, Demmers TGH, Wathes CM (2000) The preferences of laying hens for different concentrations of atmospheric ammonia. Appl Anim Behav Sci 68:307–318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LayWel (2006) Welfare implication of changes in production systems for poultry. http://www.laywel.eu/web/ date accessed

  • Lee HY, Craig JV (1990) Beak-trimming effects on the behaviour and weight gain of floor-reared, egg strain pullets from three genetic stocks during the rearing period. Poult Sci 69:568–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lensink BJ, Boissy A, Veissier I (2000) The relationship between farmers’ attitude and behaviour towards calves, and productivity of veal units. Ann Zootech 49:313–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lensink BJ, Fernandez X, Cozzi G, Florand L, Veissier I (2001) The influence of farmers’ behaviour on calves’ reactions to transport and quality of veal meat. J Anim Sci 79:642–652

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lunam CA, Glatz PC (2000) Declawing of farmed emus. Harmful or Helpful. A final report to the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation Publication No 99/177, ISBN 0 642 58026 X ISSN 1440–6845

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason GJ (1991) Stereotypies: a critical review. Anim Behav 41:1015–1037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauldin JM, Siegel PB (1979) Fear, head shaking and production in five populations of caged chickens. Br Poult Sci 20:39–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKeegan DEF, Deeming DC (1997) Effects of gender and group size on the time-activity budgets of adult breeding ostriches (Struthio camelus) in a farm environment. Appl Anim Behav Sci 51:159–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellor DJ, Cook CJ, Stafford KJ (2000) Quantifying some responses to pain as a stressor. In: Moberg GP, Mench JA (eds) The biology of animal stress. CAB International, Oxon, pp 171–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer A, Cloete SWP, Brown CR, van Schalkwyk SJ (2002) Declawing ostrich (Struthio camelus domesticus) chicks to minimize skin damage during rearing. S Afr J Anim Sci 32:192–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer A, Cloete SWP, Brown CR, van Schalkwyk SJ (2003) The persistence to slaughter age of scars resulting from damage inflicted to ostrich skins during the grow-out phase. S Afr J Anim Sci 33:32–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell BW, Buhr RJ, Berrang ME, Bailey JS, Cox NA (2002) Reducing airborne pathogens, dust and salmonella transmission in experimental hatching cabinets using an electrostatic space charge system. Poult Sci 81:49–55

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moberg GP (2000) Biological response to stress: implications for animal welfare. In: Moberg GP, Mench JA (eds) The biology of animal stress. CABI Publishing, CAB International, Oxon and New York, pp 1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Malley P, Snowden I (1999) Emu products. Increasing production and profitability. A report for the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. Research Paper Series No 99/143, Canberra, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Odberg F (1987) Behavioural responses of stress in farm animals. In: Van Adrichem PWM, Wiepkema PR (eds) The biology of stress in farm animals: an integrated approach. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, pp 135–149

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Office of the Queensland Parliamentary Counsel (2009) Animal Care and Protection Act 2001. Animal Care and Protection. Regulation 2002. Reprint No 3B. http://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/LEGISLTN/CURRENT/A/AnimalCaPrR02.pdf

  • Quarles CL, Caveny DD (1979) Effects of air contaminants on performance and quality of broilers. Poult Sci 58:543–548

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rushen J (1984) Stereotyped behaviour, adjunctive drinking and the feeding periods of tethered sows. Anim Behav 52:1059–1067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rushen J (1985) Stereotypies, aggression and the feeding schedules of tethered sows. Appl Anim Behav Sci 14:137–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandøe P, Forkman F, Christiansen SB (2004) Scientific uncertainty - how should it be handled in relation to scientific advice regarding animal welfare issues? Anim Welfare 13:121–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Seedorf J, Hartung J, Schroder M, Linkert KH, Phillips VR, Holden MR, Sneath RW, Short JL, White RP, Pedersen S, Takai H, Johnsen JO, Metz JHM, Groot Koerkamp PWG, Uenk GH, Wathes CM (1998) Concentrations and emissions of airborne endotoxins and microorganisms in livestock buildings in Northern Europe. J Agric Eng Res 70:97–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Standing Committee on Agriculture and Resource Management (2003) Model code of practice for the welfare of animals. Farming of ostriches. CSIRO Publications, East Melbourne, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Takai H, Pedersen S, Johnsen JO, Metz JHM, Groot Koerkamp PWG, Uenk GH, Phillips VR, Holden MR, Sneath RW, Short JL, White RP, Hartung J, Seedorf J, Schroder M, Linkert KH, Wathes CM (1998) Concentrations and emissions of airborne dust in livestock buildings in Northern Europe. J Agric Eng Res 70:59–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uhart M, Aprile G, Beldomenico P, Solis G, Marull C, Beade M, Carminati A, Moreno D (2006) Evaluation of the health of free-ranging greater rheas (Rhea americana) in Argentina. Vet Rec 158:297–303

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Wicklen GL, Foutz TL, Rowland GN (2001) Respirable tissue damage in broilers exposed to aerosol particles and ammonia. Trans ASAE 44:889–1894

    Google Scholar 

  • Vestergaard KS, Limburg L (1993) A model of feather pecking development which relates dust bathing in the fowl. Behaviour 26:291–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waiblinger S, Menke C, Coleman GJ (2002) The relationship between attitudes, personal characteristics and behaviour of stockpeople and subsequent behaviour and production of dairy cows. Appl Anim Behav Sci 79:195–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waiblinger S, Boivin X, Pedersen V, Tosi MV, Janczak AM, Visser EK, Jones RB (2006) Assessing the human-animal relationship in farmed species: a critical review. Appl Anim Behav Sci 101:185–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wathes CM, Phillips VR, Holden MR, Sneath RW, Short JL, White RPP, Hartung J, Seedorf J, Schroder M, Linkert KH (1998) Emissions of aerial pollutants in livestock buildings in northern Europe: overview of a multinational project. J Agric Eng Res 70:3–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster AB, Hurnik JF (1990) Behaviour, production, and well being of the laying hen. 2. Individual variation and relationships of behaviour to production and physical condition. Poult Sci 70:421–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weeks CA, Nicol CJ (2006) Preferences of laying hens. Worlds Poult Sci J 62:296–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. C. Glatz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Glatz, P.C. (2011). Welfare Issues Associated with Ratite Husbandry Practices. In: Glatz, P., Lunam, C., Malecki, I. (eds) The Welfare of Farmed Ratites. Animal Welfare, vol 11. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19297-5_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics