Skip to main content

Seismic Assessment of FRP-Retrofitted RC Frames Using Pushover Analysis Considering Strain Softening of Concrete

  • Conference paper
  • 300 Accesses

Abstract

Seismic actions cause unacceptable levels of damage in existing RC buildings. Existing buildings designed to earlier codes have insufficient lateral resistance, exhibit lower strength and ductility, which induce a global failure mechanism to the structure. Under these circumstances, “weak-column strong-beam” behaviour dominated the buildings which may lead to the formation of local hinges in the column and so strengthening becomes necessary. In this paper, seismic behaviour of retrofitted RC frames using FRP at joints and steel braces are investigated. For this, moment curvature of the FRP-retrofitted joints are captured by FE analysis considering strain softening of concrete and then pushover analysis for all frames are carried out. Ductility, behaviour factor and performance points of two, four and eight stories frames are then evaluated. The results show that FRP-retrofitting technique can better improve the seismic performance of eight storey frame than steel braces but in low-rise frames, both techniques are beneficial.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   389.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • ABA. 2005. Iranian concrete code. Report No. 120, Islamic Republic of Iran Management and Planning Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • ACI318. 1999, 2005. Building code requirements for structural concrete. American Concrete Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • AS3600. 2001. Australian standard on concrete structures. Standards Australia International Ltd, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • ATC. 1996. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings. ATC-40, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balsamo et al. 2005. Seismic behavior of a full-scale RC frame repaired using CFRP laminates. Engineering Structures 27: 769–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Computers and Structures Inc. CSI. 2007. SAP2000 software. Non-linear version 11.0.0, Berkeley, California, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghobarah, A. 2003. Seismic rehabilitation of RC frames using steel brace system. Sixth International Conference on Civil Engineering (ICCE), Isfahan, Iran: 43–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hibbitt, Karlsson, & Sorensen Inc. 2007. ABAQUS theory manual, users manual and example manual. Version 6.7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maheri, M.R. & Sahebi, A. 1997. Use of steel bracing in reinforced concrete frames. Engineering Structures, Vol. 19, No. 12: 1018–1024.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahini, S.S., Ronagh, H.R., and Niroomandi, A. 2008. Performance Based Assessment of FRP-Retrofitted Existing RC Frames. Proceedings of Fourth International Conference on FRP Composites in Civil Engineering (CICE08) 22–24 July 2008, Zurich, Switzerland Empa, Duebendorf, Paper 6.B.6. p.6 (CD-ROM).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahini S.S. and Ronagh, H.R. 2009. Numerical modelling of FRP strengthened RC beam-column joints. Structural Engineering & Mechanics, 32(5): 649–665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahini, SS. & Ronagh, H.R. 2010. Strength and ductility of FRP web-bonded RC beams for the assessment of retrofitted beam-column joints. Composite structures, 92(6): 1325–1332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miranda, E. & Bertero, VV. 1994. Evaluation of strength reduction factors for earthquake-resistant design. Earthquake Spectra 10(2): 357–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee, A. & Joshi, M. 2005. CFRP reinforced concrete beam-column joints under cyclic excitation. composite structures, 70: 185–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohishi, H. et al. 1988. A seismic strengthening design and practice of an existing reinforced concrete school building in Shejuoka City. Proc. 9th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Japan, Vol. III.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standard No. 2800, 2005. Iranian code of practice for seismic resistant design of buildings. Building and Housing Research Center, Third edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zou et al. 2007. Optimal performance-based design of FRP jackets for seismic retrofit of reinforced concrete frames. Composites: Part B 38: 584–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Tsinghua University Press, Beijing and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mahini, S.S., Hadigheh, S.A., Maheri, M.R. (2011). Seismic Assessment of FRP-Retrofitted RC Frames Using Pushover Analysis Considering Strain Softening of Concrete. In: Ye, L., Feng, P., Yue, Q. (eds) Advances in FRP Composites in Civil Engineering. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17487-2_185

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17487-2_185

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-17486-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-17487-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics