Skip to main content

Vagina and Vulva: Imaging Techniques, Normal Anatomy and Anatomical Variants

  • Reference work entry
Abdominal Imaging

Abstract

Detecting and evaluating abnormalities of the female vagina and vulva are difficult on imaging due to the limitations inherent in each modality, radiation safety issues, and perhaps cultural restrictions. Computed tomography (CT) does not play a significant role in imaging the vagina and vulva due to poor soft tissue resolution of perineal anatomy. Although ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) often play complimentary roles, MRI is now the predominant imaging modality. It is often superior to both ultrasound and CT because of its ability to produce nondegraded multi-planar images and superior contrast resolution without the use of ionizing radiation. MRI is also noninvasive and allows visualization of the female reproductive organs in their orthotopic positions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 1,099.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Burgis J. Obstructive Müllerian anomalies: case report, diagnosis, and management. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185:338–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carrington BM, Hricak H, Nuruddin RN, Secaf E, Laros Jr RK, Hill EC. Müllerian duct anomalies: MR imaging evaluation. Radiology. 1990;176:715–20.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Church DG, Vancil JM, Vasanawala SS. Magnetic resonance imaging for uterine and vaginal anomalies. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2009;21(5):379–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Currarino G. Single vaginal ectopic ureter and Gartner’s duct cyst with ipsilateral renal hypoplasia and dysplasia (or agenesis). J Urol. 1982;128:988–93.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grant LA, Sala E, Griffin N. Congenital and acquired conditions of the vulva and vagina on magnetic resonance imaging: a pictorial review. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2010;31(5):347–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin N, Grant LA, Sala E. Magnetic resonance imaging of vaginal and vulval pathology. Eur Radiol. 2008;18(6):1269–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins KL, Nino-Murcia M, Friedland GW, et al. Miscellaneous congenital anomalies of the genitourinary tract. In: Pollack HM, McClennan GL, editors. Clinical urography. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: W. B Saunders; 2000. p. 892–911.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kier R. Nonovarian gynecologic cysts: MR imaging findings. Am J Roentgenol. 1992;158:1265–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd J, Crouch NS, Minto CLK, Liao LM, Creighton SM. Female genital appearance: “normality” unfolds. BJOG. 2005;112(5):643–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morcel K, Camborieux L, Guerrier D. Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2007;2:13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Panayi DC, Digesu GA, Tekkis P, Fernando R, Khullar V. Ultrasound measurement of vaginal wall thickness: a novel and reliable technique. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(10):1265–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Park SJ, Lee HK, Hong HS, Kim HC, Kim DH, Park JS, Shin EJ. Hydrocele of the canal of Nuck in a girl: ultrasound and MR appearance. Br J Radiol. 2004;77:243–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Quint EH, McCarthy JD, Smith YR. Vaginal surgery for congenital anomalies. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2010;53(1):115–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scanlan KA, Pozniak MA, Fagerholm M, Shapiro S. Value of transperineal sonography in the assessment of vaginal atresia. Am J Roentgenol. 1990;154:545–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Semelka RC, Ascher SM, Reinhold C. Female urethra and vagina. In: Semelka RC, editor. MRI of the abdomen and pelvis: a text atlas. North Carolina: Wiley-Liss; 1997. p. 571–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegelman ES, Outwater EK, Banner MP, Ramchandani P, Anderson TL, Schnall MD. High-resolution MR imaging of the vagina. Radiographics. 1997;17:1183–203.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Suh DD, Yang CC, Cao Y, Garland PA, Maravilla KR. Magnetic resonance imaging anatomy of the female genitalia in premenopausal and postmenopausal women. J Urol. 2003;170(1):138–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea G. Rockall .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this entry

Cite this entry

Soo, M.J., Bharwani, N., Rockall, A.G. (2013). Vagina and Vulva: Imaging Techniques, Normal Anatomy and Anatomical Variants. In: Hamm, B., Ros, P.R. (eds) Abdominal Imaging. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13327-5_197

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13327-5_197

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-13326-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-13327-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics