Skip to main content

Semantically Characterizing Collaborative Behavior in an Abstract Dialogue Framework

  • Conference paper
Book cover Foundations of Information and Knowledge Systems (FoIKS 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 5956))

Abstract

A fundamental requirement of collaborative dialogue formal systems is ensuring both that all the relevant information will be exposed and also irrelevancies will be avoided. The challenge is to fulfill this requirement in the context of a distributed MAS where each agent is unaware of the private knowledge of the others. We argue that it is possible to give a general treatment to this problem in terms of relevance notions, and propose a partial solution which reduces the problem to that of finding adequate potential relevance notions. Specifically, we present in this work an Abstract Dialogue Framework which provides an environment for studying the behavior of collaborative dialogue systems in terms of abstract relevance notions, together with three Collaborative Semantics each of which defines a different collaborative behavior of the dialogues under the framework. One of these semantics describes an utopian, non practical, behavior which is approximated in different ways by the other two constructive semantics. Complete examples are provided in Propositional Logic Programming.

This research is partially supported by Sec. Gral. de Ciencia y Tecnología (Univ. Nac. del Sur), CONICET and Agencia Nac. de Prom. Científica y Técnica (ANPCyT).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Kraus, S., Sycara, K., Evenchik, A.: Reaching agreements through argumentation: A logical model and implementation. Artificial Intelligence (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Parsons, S., Amgoud, L., Wooldridge, M.: An analysis of formal inter-agent dialogues. In: AAMAS 2002, Bologna, Italy (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Amgoud, L., Prade, H., Belabbes, S.: Towards a formal framework for the search of a consensus between autonomous agents. In: AAMAS 2005, Utrecht (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Amgoud, L., Dimopoulos, Y., Moraitis, P.: A unified and general framework for argumentation based negotiation. In: AAMAS 2007, Honolulu, Hawai’i (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Black, E., Hunter, A.: A generative inquiry dialogue system. In: AAMAS 2007, Honolulu, Hawai’i (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Marcos, M.J., Falappa, M.A., Simari, G.R.: A set of collaborative semantics for an abstract dialogue framework. In: The 6th IJCAI Workshop on Knowledge and Reasoning in Practical Dialogue Systems (KRPD 2009), Pasadena, California, USA (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Walton, D., Krabbe, E.: Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning. State University of New York Press, Albany (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Makinson, D.: General patterns in nonmonotonic reasoning. In: Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Prakken, H.: Coherence and flexibility in dialogue games for argumentation. J. Log. Comput. (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Parsons, S., McBurney, P., Sklar, E., Wooldridge, M.: On the relevance of utterances in formal inter-agent dialogues. In: AAMAS 2007, Honolulu, Hawai’i (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kakas, A.C., Kowalski, R.A., Toni, F.: Abductive logic programming. J. Log. Comput. (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Prakken, H.: On dialogue systems with speech acts, arguments, and counterarguments. In: Brewka, G., Moniz Pereira, L., Ojeda-Aciego, M., de Guzmán, I.P. (eds.) JELIA 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1919, p. 224. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Prakken, H.: Relating protocols for dynamic dispute with logics for defeasible argumentation. Synthese (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  14. García, A.J., Simari, G.R.: Defeasible logic programming: An argumentative aproach. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming 4(1), 95–138 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Amgoud, L., de Saint-Cyr, F.D.: Measures for persuasion dialogs: A preliminary investigation. In: COMMA 2008, Toulouse, France (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Marcos, M.J., Falappa, M.A., Simari, G.R. (2010). Semantically Characterizing Collaborative Behavior in an Abstract Dialogue Framework. In: Link, S., Prade, H. (eds) Foundations of Information and Knowledge Systems. FoIKS 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5956. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11829-6_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11829-6_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-11828-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-11829-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics