Skip to main content

Views of the European Environmental Bureau on the Commission’s Impact Assessment Procedure – With a Focus on Environment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 563 Accesses

Abstract

EEB’s experience pointed out in this chapter shows a genuine need for further investments in data collection – to identify and collect the relevant data needed for impact analysis and to invest in finding appropriate methodologies – qualitative or quantitative. Our assessment also identified the danger of political influence in impact assessments, which could lead to inappropriate trade-offs and policy choices based not on objective information but on political interests and influence. The need for improvements in transparency – of data, methods and stakeholder participation, and improvements in the consultation modes were also addressed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.eeb.org/index.html

  2. 2.

    http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/treaties/dat/12002E/htm/C_2002325EN.003301.html

  3. 3.

    http://ec.europa.eu/governance/impact/index_en.htm

  4. 4.

    http://www.eeb.org/activities/integration/Article6watch-report-to-member-june04.pdf

  5. 5.

    http://www.eeb.org/activities/General/EEB-input-to-IA-evaluation-301106-FINAL.pdf

  6. 6.

    http://www.eeb.org/activities/integration/Article6watch-report-to-member-june04.pdf (ANNEX I and II).

  7. 7.

    See http://www.eeb.org/activities/waste/20060630-Okopol-Brief-on-MSWI-efficiency-formula-v5-final.pdf and “EEB’s key concerns with Commissioner Dimas’s letter and note to MEP Florenz (24/8/2006) assessing the potential impacts of the proposal to use an energy threshold to distinguish between municipal incinerators that are disposal installations from those that are recovery.”

  8. 8.

    EEB Comments on the Commission Staff Working Document – Impact Assessment on the Thematic Strategy on Prevention and Recycling of Waste and the immediate implementing measures; February 2, 2006.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pendo Maro .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Maro, P. (2010). Views of the European Environmental Bureau on the Commission’s Impact Assessment Procedure – With a Focus on Environment. In: Bizer, K., Lechner, S., Führ, M. (eds) The European Impact Assessment and the Environment. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11670-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11670-4_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-11669-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-11670-4

  • eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics