Skip to main content

Roles and Domains to Teach in Online Learning Environments: Educational ICT Competency Framework for University Teachers

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Changing Cultures in Higher Education

Abstract

This chapter is aimed at presenting an integrated framework of the educational information and communications technology (ICT) competencies that university teachers should have to teach in an online learning environment. Teaching through ICT in higher education involves performing three main roles – pedagogical, socialist, and design/planning – and also two cross-cutting domains that arise from the online environment: technological and managerial. This framework as well as the competencies for university teachers associated with it were validated at a European level by a dual process of net-based focus groups of teachers and teacher trainers in each of the participating countries in a European Project (Elene-TLC) and an online Delphi method involving 78 experts from 14 universities of ten European countries. The competency framework and the examples provided in the chapter are the basis for designing innovative professional development activities in online university environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, T., & Kanuka, H. (2003). E-research: methods, strategies, and issues. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teacher presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning networks, 5(2), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beetham, H., & Sharpe, Rh (eds). (2007). Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age: designing and delivering e-learning. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berge, Z. L. (1995). Facilitating computer conferencing: recommendations from the field. Educational Technology, 35(1), 22–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coppola, W. N., Hiltz, R., & Rotter, N. (2002). Becoming a virtual professor: pedagogical roles and asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(4), 169–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dondi, C., Mancinelli, E., & Moretti, M. (2006). Adapting existing competence frameworks to higher education environments. In The challenge of eCompetence in academic staff development (chapter 2). http://www.ecompetence.info/uploads/media/ch2.pdf. Accessed 02 June 2009.

  • Egan, M. T., & Akdere, M. (2005). Clarifying distance education roles and competencies. Exploring similarities and differences between professional and student-practitioners perspectives. American Journal of Distance Education, 19(2), 87–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eraut, M. (1998). Concept of competence. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 12, 127–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonczi, S., Hager, P., & Athanasou, J. (1993). The development of competency-based assessment strategies for the professions. In Australian National Office of Overseas Skills Recognition, Research paper no. 8. Canberra: Australian Gvt. Pub. Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodyear, P., Salmon, G., Spector, J., Steeples, C., & Tickner, S. (2001). Competencies for online teaching: a special report. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(1), 65–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guasch, T., Alvarez, I., & Espasa, A. (2009). University teacher competencies in a virtual teaching/learning environment: Analysis of a teacher training experience. Teaching and Teacher Education, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunawardena, C., & Zittle, F. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer-mediated conferencing environment. American Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 8–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hung, D., & Der-Thanq, Ch. (2001). Situated Cognition, Vygotskian Thought and Learning from the Communities of Practice Perspective: Implications for the Design of Web-Based E-Learning. Educational Media International, 38(1), 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. (2003). Learning to solve problems with technology: a constructivist perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. H., Peck, K. J., & Wilson, B. G. (1999). Learning with technology. A constructivist perspective. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J., Spector, M., Grabowski, B., & De la Teja I. (2004). Instructor competencies. Standards for face-to face, online and blended settings. USA: AECT and ibstpi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurillard, D. (2002a). Rethinking teaching for the knowledge society. EDUCAUSE Review, 37(1), 16–25. http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/erm0201.pdf. Accessed 02 June 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mac Labhrainn, I., McDonald Legg, C., Schneckenberg, D., & Wildt, J. (eds). (2006). The challenge of eCompetence in academic staff development. Galway: NUI Galway.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, D. C. (1998). Identifying competencies with behavioral-event interviews. Psychological Science, 9(5), 331–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prestera, G. E., & Moller, L. (2001). Exploiting opportunities for knowledge building in asynchronous distance learning environments. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 2(2), 93–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, G. (2000). E-Moderating. The key to teaching and learning online. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, L. M., & Spencer, S. M. (1993). Competence at work. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tigelaar, D., Dolmans, D., Wolfhagen, I., & van der Vleuten, C. (2004). The development and validation of a framework for teaching competencies in higher education. Higher Education, 48(2), 253–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westera, W. (2001). Competences in education: a confusion of tongues. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 33(1), 75–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P. (2003). Roles and competences for distance education programs in higher institutions. American Journal Education, 17, 45–57.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Teresa Guasch .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Guasch, T., Alvarez, I., Espasa, A. (2010). Roles and Domains to Teach in Online Learning Environments: Educational ICT Competency Framework for University Teachers. In: Ehlers, UD., Schneckenberg, D. (eds) Changing Cultures in Higher Education. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03582-1_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03582-1_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-03581-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-03582-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics