Skip to main content

Deceit and Self-Deception

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mind the Gap

Abstract

Deception is a universal feature of life, at all levels and in all relationships both within species and between species, inside individuals and outside, with strong effects on both deceiver and deceived. Being detected often results in a sharp reversal of fortune for the deceiver thereby intensifying selection to deceive successfully. In encounters between human strangers, nervousness, signs of control and of cognitive load can all serve as cues of deception but cognitive load appears to be the most important. Self-deception is defined as hiding true information from the conscious mind in the unconscious, and is illustrated by classical experimental work. Selection to deceive can favor self-deception, the better to hide the deception and separately to reduce its cognitive costs. Four examples are described. There is a general tendency toward self-inflation in humans, the better to give off a positive image. Conscious thought suppression, studied via fMRI, shows that one area of the brain has been coopted to suppress memory formation elsewhere in the brain. When people reach age 60, they fail to attend to negative social reality, and this old-age positivity may give immune benefits. Across primates there is a strong positive association between relative size of the neocortex and frequency of deceptive acts in nature. If the relationship holds within species, we may expect relatively intelligent humans to be prone to self-deception. There is such a thing as imposed self-deception, in which we act out the system of self-deception of another. Likewise, there is parasitized self-deception in which our system of self-deception makes us more vulnerable to deception by others. Con artists are given as an example. One could model the evolution of deceit and self-deception as a multiplayer game, which can then be analyzed mathematically, modeled via computer simulations or tested experimentally. One promising possibility is a variant of the Ultimatum Game, in which deception and detection of deception are permitted and given quantitative values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson MC, Ochsner KN, Kuhl B, Cooper J, Robertson E, Gabrieli SW, Glover GH, Gabrieli JDE (2004) Neural systems underlying the suppression of unwanted memories. Science 303:232–235

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod R, Hamilton WD (1981) The evolution of cooperation. Science 211:1390–1396

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burt A, Trivers R (2006) Genes in conflict: the biology of selfish genetic elements. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark DD, Sokoloff L (1999) Circulation and energy metabolism of the brain. In: Siegel GJ, Agranoff BW, Albers RW, Fisher SK, Uhler MD (eds) Basic neurochemistry: molecular, cellular and medical aspects. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 637–670

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossman AM, Lewis M (2006) Adults’ ability to detect children’s lying. Behav Sci Law 24:703–715

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DePaulo BM, Lindsay JJ, Malone BE, Muhlenbruck L, Charlton K, Cooper H (2003) Cues to deception. Psychol Bull 129:74–118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas W, Gibbons K (1983) Inadequacy of voice recognition as a demonstration of self-deception. J Pers Soc Psychol 44:589–592

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Epley N, Whitchurch E (2008) Mirror, mirror on the wall: enhancement in self-recognition. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 34:1159–1170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gehring WJ, Karpinski A, Hilton JI (2003) Thinking about interracial interactions. Nat Neurosci 6:1241–1243

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert D (2006) Stumbling toward happiness. Alfred A Knopf, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald AG (1980) The totalitarian ego: fabrication and revision of personal histories. Am Psychol 35:603–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald AG, McGhee DE, Schwartz JLK (1998) Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. J Pers Soc Psychol 74:1464–1480

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald AG, Nosek BA, Banaji MR (2003) Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. J Pers Soc Psychol 85:197–216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gur RC, Sackeim HA (1979) Self-deception: a concept in search of a phenomenon. J Pers Soc Psychol 37:147–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haig D (2002) Genomic imprinting and kinship. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartung J (1988) Deceiving down: conjectures on the management of subordinate status. In: Lockard JS, Paulhus DL (eds) Self-deception: an adaptive mechanism?. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp 170–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser MD (1992) Costs of deception: cheaters are punished in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:12137–12139

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Isaakowitz DM, Toner K, Goren D, Wilson HR (2008) Looking while unhappy: mood-congruent gaze in young adults, positive gaze in older adults. Psychol Sci 19:848–853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kassin SM (2008) False confessions: causes, consequences and implications for reform. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 17:249–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maass A (1999) Linguistic intergroup bias: stereotype perpetuation through language. Adv Exp Soc Psychol 31:79–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann S, Vrij A (2006) Police officers judgements of veracity, tenseness, cognitive load and attempted behavioral control in real life police interviews. Psychol Crime Law 12:307–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markle S (2007) Stick insects: masters of defense. Lerner Publishing Group, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather M, Carstensen LL (2003) Aging and attentional biases for emotional faces. Psychol Sci 14:409–415

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mather M, Carstensen LL (2005) Aging and motivated cognition: the positivity effect in attention and memory. Trends Cogn Sci 9:496–502

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mather M, Canli T, English T, Whitfield S, Wais P, Ochsner K, Gabrieli JDE, Carstensen LL (2004) Amygdala responses to emotionally valenced stimuli in older and younger adults. Psychol Sci 15:259–263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP (1987) Social control of deception among status signaling house sparrows Passer domesticus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 20:307–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nosek BA, Banaji MR, Greenwald AG (2002) Harvesting implicit group attitudes and beliefs from a demonstration website. Group Dyn 6:101–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak MA, Sigmund K (1993) A strategy of win-stay, lose-shift that outperforms tit-for-tat in the prisoner’s dilemma game. Nature 364:56–58

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak MA, Sigmund K (1998a) Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring. Nature 393:573–577

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak MA, Sigmund K (1998b) The dynamics of indirect reciprocity. J Theor Biol 194:561–574

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak MA, Sigmund K (2004) Evolutionary dynamics of biological games. Science 303:793–799

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pennebaker JW (1997) Opening up: the healing power of expressing emotions. Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Richeson JA, Shelton JN (2003) When prejudice does not pay: effects of interracial contact on executive function. Psychol Sci 14:287–290

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Richeson JA, Baird AA, Gordon HL, Heatherton TF, Wyland CL, Trawalter S, Shelton JN (2003) An fMRI investigation of the impact of interracial contact on executive function. Nat Neurosci 6:1323–1328

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenkranz MA, Jackson DC, Dalton KM, Dolski I, Ryff CD, Singer BH, Muller D, Kalin NH, Davidson RJ (2003) Affective style and in vivo immune response: neurobehavioral mechanisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:11148–11152

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stoltz JA, Neff BD (2006) Male size and mating tactic influence proximity to females during sperm competition in bluegill sunfish. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 59:811–818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavris C, Aronson E (2007) Mistakes were made (but not by me): why we justify foolish beliefs, bad decisions, and hurtful acts. Harcourt, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tibbetts EA, Dale J (2004) A socially enforced signal of quality in a paper wasp. Nature 432:218–222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers R (1985) Social evolution. Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers R (2000) The elements of a scientific theory of self-deception. Ann NY Acad Sci 907:114–131

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers R (2005) Reciprocal altruism: 30 years later. In: van Schaik CP, Kappeler PM (eds) Cooperation in primates and humans: mechanisms and evolution. Springer, Berlin, pp 67–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Troisi A (2002) Displacement activities as a behavioral measure of stress in nonhuman primates and human subjects. Stress 5:47–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vrij A (2004) Why professionals fail to catch liars and how they can improve. Leg Criminol Psychol 9:159–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vrij A, Fisher R, Mann S, Leal S (2006) Detecting deception by manipulating cognitive load. Trends Cogn Sci 10:141–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Trivers .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Trivers, R. (2010). Deceit and Self-Deception. In: Kappeler, P., Silk, J. (eds) Mind the Gap. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02725-3_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics