Skip to main content

AgentTime: A Distributed Multi-agent Software System for University’s Timetabling

  • Chapter
From System Complexity to Emergent Properties

Part of the book series: Understanding Complex Systems ((UCS))

Summary

In the course of researching timetabling problems for complex distributed systems this article applies the multi-agent paradigm of computations and presents a correspondent mathematical model for university’s timetabling problem solution. The model takes into account dynamic nature of this problem and individual preferences of different remote users for time and location of classes. In the framework of that model authors propose an original problem-oriented algorithm of multi-agent communication. Developed algorithm is used as a foundation for the distributed software system AgentTime. Based on multi-agent JADE platform AgentTime provides friendly graphical interface for online design of time tables for universities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Simon, H.A.: Administrative Behavior. Free Press, New York (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Haken, H.: Synergetics, an Introduction: Nonequilibrium Phase Transitions and Self-Organization in Physics, Chemistry, and Biology. Springer, New York (1983)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Cheng, J.Q., Wellman, M.P.: The WALRAS Algorithm: A Convergent Distributed Implementation of General Equilibrium Outcomes. Journal of Computational Economics 12, 1–23 (1998)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Sandhu, K.S.: Automating Class Schedule Generation in the Context of a University Time-tabling Information System. PhD Thesis (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Petrovic, S., Burke, E.: University Timetabling. University of Nottingham (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Akkoyunly, E.A.: A Linear Algorithm for Computing the Optimum University Timetable. The Computer Journal 16(4), 347–350 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Shaerf, A.: Local Search Techniques for Large High School Timetabling Problems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man And Cybernetics 29(4), 368–377 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. De Werra, D.: An Introduction to Timetabling. European Journal of Operational Research 19, 151–162 (1985)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Taha, T.R.: Numerical schemes for nonlinear evolution equations. The College Journal of Science and Technology 2, 105–116 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dimopoulou, M., Miliotis, P.: Implementation of a university course and examination time-tabling system. European Journal of Operational Research 130(1), 202–213 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Burke, E.K., Ross, P. (eds.) PATAT 1995. LNCS, vol. 1153. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Burke, E., Erben, W. (eds.) PATAT 2000. LNCS, vol. 2079. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Burke, E.K., De Causmaecker, P. (eds.) PATAT 2002. LNCS, vol. 2740. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Back, T.: Evolutionary Algorithms in theory and practice. Oxford University Press, New-York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sharma, D., Chandra, N.: An evolutionary approach to constraint-based timetabling. In: Kowalczyk, R., Loke, S.W., Reed, N.E., Graham, G. (eds.) PRICAI-WS 2000. LNCS, vol. 2112, pp. 80–92. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Sanchez, E., Shibata, T., Zadeh, L.: Genetic Algorithms and Fuzzy Logic Systems. In: Soft Computing Perspectives. World Scientific, Singapore (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Buckles, B.P., Petry, F.E.: Genetic Algorithms. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Goldberg, D.E.: Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1989)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Maxfield, C.: Genetic algorithms: programs that boggle the mind. EDN (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Srinivas, M., Patnik, L.M.: Genetic Algorithms: A Survey. IEEE Computer 27(6), 17–26 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Abramson, D.: Constructing School Timetables Using Simulated Annealing: Sequential and Parallel Algorithms. Management-Science (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wellman, M.P., Walsh, W.E., Wurman, P.R., MacKie-Mason, J.K.: Auction Protocols for De-centralized Scheduling. Games and Economic Behavior 35, 271–303 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Walsh, W.E., Yokoo, M., Hirayama, K., Wellman, M.P.: On Market-Inspired Approaches to Propositional Satisfiability. In: Proceedings of Int. Conf. IJCAI 2000, pp. 1152–1160 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Yokoo, M., Hirayama, K.: Distributed Constraint Satisfaction Algorithm for Complex Local Problems. In: Proceedings of the Int. Conf. ICMAS 1998, pp. 372–379 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yokoo, M., Hirayama, K.: Algorithms for Distributed Constraints Satisfaction: A Review. In: Proceedings of Int. Conf. AAMAS 2002, vol. 3(2), pp. 185–207 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Garrido, L., Sycara, K.: Multi-Agent Meeting Scheduling: Preliminary Experimental Results. In: Proceedings of the Int. Conf. ICMAS 1996 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Franzin, M.S., Freuder, E.C., Rossi, F., Wallace, R.: Multiagent Meeting Scheduling with Preferences: Efficiency, Privacy Loss, and Solution Quality. In: Proceedings of Intrl. Conf. AAAI 2002 (workshop on preference in AI and CP) (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  28. BenHassine, A., Ito, T., Ho, T.B.: A New Distributed Approach to Solve Meeting Scheduling Problems. In: Proceedings of IEEE/WIC Int. Conf. IAT, pp. 588–591 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  29. BenHassine, A., Defago, X., Ho, T.B.: Agent-Based Approach to Dynamic Meeting Scheduling Problems. In: Proceedings of Int. Conf. AAMAS 2004, vol. 3, pp. 1132–1139 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Al–Maqtari, S., Abdulrab, H., Nosary, A.: Constraint Programming and Multi-Agent System mixing approach for agricultural Decision Support System. In: Proceedings of In. Conf. ECCS 2005, pp. 199–213 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bellifemine, F.L., Caire, G., Greenwood, D.: Developing Multi-Agent Systems with JADE. Wiley, Chichester (2007)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Babkin, E., Abdulrab, H., Babkina, T. (2009). AgentTime: A Distributed Multi-agent Software System for University’s Timetabling. In: Aziz-Alaoui, M.A., Bertelle, C. (eds) From System Complexity to Emergent Properties. Understanding Complex Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02199-2_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics