Abstract
The primary stability of uncemented orthopaedic implants is dependent upon the production of a stable mechanical environment at surgery. Excessive movement between the prosthesis and the surrounding bone can lead to the formation of fibrous tissue instead of a direct bond with the bone. The establishment of an interference fit at surgery, called a press-fit, is widely used to limit such interfacial movement. Although this technique is very successful, bone fracture at surgery can occur if too high a fit is attempted. The question therefore arises as to what is the minimum level of interference that will help provide the mechanical environment in which osseointegration can occur. Computational approaches, such as the finite element methodology, are currently being explored in order to inform this discussion by identifying the characteristics of the mechanical environment which have most effect.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bühler DW, Berlemann U, Lippuner K, Jaeger P, Nolte LP. (1997), Three-dimensional primary stability of cementless femoral stems. Clin Biomech 12(2):75–86, doi:10.1016/S0268-0033(96)00059-9
Jasty M, Bragdon C, Burke D, O’Connor D, Lowenstein J, Harris WH. (1997), In vivo skeletal responses to porous-surfaced implants subjected to small induced motions. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 79(5):707–14.
Davidson D, Pike J, Garbuz D, Duncan CP, Masri BA. (2008), Intraoperative periprosthetic fractures during total hip arthroplasty. Evaluation and management. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 90(9):2000–12, doi:10.2106/JBJS.H.00331
Schileo E, Taddei F, Malandrino A, Cristofolini L, Viceconti M. (2007), Subject-specific finite element models can accurately predict strain levels in long bones. J Biomech. 40(13):2982–9. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech. 2007.02.010
Pancanti A, Bernakiewicz M, Viceconti M.(2003), The primary stability of a cementless stem varies between subjects as much as between activities. J Biomech. 36(6):777–785. doi:10.1016/S0021-9290(03)00011-3
Shultz TR, Blaha JD, Gruen TA, Norman TL. (2006) Cortical bone viscoelasticity and fixation strength of press-fit femoral stems: finite element model. J Biomech Eng. 128(1):7–12. DOI:10.1115/1.2133765
Helgason B, Perilli E, Schileo E, Taddei F, Brynjólfsson S, Viceconti M. (2008), Mathematical relationships between bone density and mechanical properties: a literature review. Clin Biomech 23(2):135–146. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.08.024
Kuiper JH, Huiskes R. (1996), Friction and stem stiffness affect dynamic interface motion in total hip replacement. J Orthop Res. 14(1):36–43. doi 10.1002/jor.1100140108
Viceconti M, Muccini R, Bernakiewicz M, Baleani M, Cristofolini L. (2000), Large-sliding contact elements accurately predict levels of bone-implant micromotion relevant to osseointegration. J Biomech. 33(12):1611–1618. doi:10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00140-8
Bernakiewicz M, Viceconti M. (2002), The role of parameter identification in finite element contact analyses with reference to orthopaedic biomechanics applications. J Biomech. 35(1):61–67. doi:10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00163-4
Dammak M, Shirazi-Adl A, Zukor DJ. (1997), Analysis of cementless implants using interface nonlinear friction—experimental and finite element studies. J Biomech. 1997 Feb;30(2):121–129. doi:10.1016/S0021-9290(96)00110-8
Abdul-Kadir MR, Hansen U, Klabunde R, Lucas D, Amis A. (2008), Finite element modelling of primary hip stem stability: the effect of interference fit. J Biomech. 41(3):587–594. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.10.009
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 International Federation of Medical and Biological Engineering
About this paper
Cite this paper
Clift, S.E. (2009). Finite Element Modeling of Uncemented Implants: Challenges in the Representation of the Press-fit Condition. In: Lim, C.T., Goh, J.C.H. (eds) 13th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 23. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92841-6_399
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92841-6_399
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-92840-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-92841-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)