Skip to main content

Finite Element Modeling of Uncemented Implants: Challenges in the Representation of the Press-fit Condition

  • Conference paper
13th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering

Part of the book series: IFMBE Proceedings ((IFMBE,volume 23))

Abstract

The primary stability of uncemented orthopaedic implants is dependent upon the production of a stable mechanical environment at surgery. Excessive movement between the prosthesis and the surrounding bone can lead to the formation of fibrous tissue instead of a direct bond with the bone. The establishment of an interference fit at surgery, called a press-fit, is widely used to limit such interfacial movement. Although this technique is very successful, bone fracture at surgery can occur if too high a fit is attempted. The question therefore arises as to what is the minimum level of interference that will help provide the mechanical environment in which osseointegration can occur. Computational approaches, such as the finite element methodology, are currently being explored in order to inform this discussion by identifying the characteristics of the mechanical environment which have most effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bühler DW, Berlemann U, Lippuner K, Jaeger P, Nolte LP. (1997), Three-dimensional primary stability of cementless femoral stems. Clin Biomech 12(2):75–86, doi:10.1016/S0268-0033(96)00059-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jasty M, Bragdon C, Burke D, O’Connor D, Lowenstein J, Harris WH. (1997), In vivo skeletal responses to porous-surfaced implants subjected to small induced motions. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 79(5):707–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Davidson D, Pike J, Garbuz D, Duncan CP, Masri BA. (2008), Intraoperative periprosthetic fractures during total hip arthroplasty. Evaluation and management. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 90(9):2000–12, doi:10.2106/JBJS.H.00331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Schileo E, Taddei F, Malandrino A, Cristofolini L, Viceconti M. (2007), Subject-specific finite element models can accurately predict strain levels in long bones. J Biomech. 40(13):2982–9. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech. 2007.02.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pancanti A, Bernakiewicz M, Viceconti M.(2003), The primary stability of a cementless stem varies between subjects as much as between activities. J Biomech. 36(6):777–785. doi:10.1016/S0021-9290(03)00011-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shultz TR, Blaha JD, Gruen TA, Norman TL. (2006) Cortical bone viscoelasticity and fixation strength of press-fit femoral stems: finite element model. J Biomech Eng. 128(1):7–12. DOI:10.1115/1.2133765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Helgason B, Perilli E, Schileo E, Taddei F, Brynjólfsson S, Viceconti M. (2008), Mathematical relationships between bone density and mechanical properties: a literature review. Clin Biomech 23(2):135–146. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.08.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kuiper JH, Huiskes R. (1996), Friction and stem stiffness affect dynamic interface motion in total hip replacement. J Orthop Res. 14(1):36–43. doi 10.1002/jor.1100140108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Viceconti M, Muccini R, Bernakiewicz M, Baleani M, Cristofolini L. (2000), Large-sliding contact elements accurately predict levels of bone-implant micromotion relevant to osseointegration. J Biomech. 33(12):1611–1618. doi:10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00140-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bernakiewicz M, Viceconti M. (2002), The role of parameter identification in finite element contact analyses with reference to orthopaedic biomechanics applications. J Biomech. 35(1):61–67. doi:10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00163-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dammak M, Shirazi-Adl A, Zukor DJ. (1997), Analysis of cementless implants using interface nonlinear friction—experimental and finite element studies. J Biomech. 1997 Feb;30(2):121–129. doi:10.1016/S0021-9290(96)00110-8

    Google Scholar 

  12. Abdul-Kadir MR, Hansen U, Klabunde R, Lucas D, Amis A. (2008), Finite element modelling of primary hip stem stability: the effect of interference fit. J Biomech. 41(3):587–594. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.10.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 International Federation of Medical and Biological Engineering

About this paper

Cite this paper

Clift, S.E. (2009). Finite Element Modeling of Uncemented Implants: Challenges in the Representation of the Press-fit Condition. In: Lim, C.T., Goh, J.C.H. (eds) 13th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 23. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92841-6_399

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92841-6_399

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-92840-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-92841-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics