Skip to main content

Modeling Mercury Capture within ESPs: Continuing Development and Validation

  • Conference paper
Electrostatic Precipitation

Abstract

Efforts to reduce anthropogenic mercury emissions worldwide have recently focused on a variety of sources, including mercury emitted during coal combustion. Toward that end, much research has been ongoing seeking to develop new processes for reducing coal combustion mercury emissions. Among air pollution control processes that can be applied to coal-fired boilers, electrostatic precipitators (ESPs) are by far the most common, both on a global scale and among the principle countries of India, China, and the USA that burn coal for electric power generation. A previously reported theoretical model of in-flight mercury capture within ESPs is herein validated against data from a number of full-scale tests of activated carbon injection for mercury emissions control, resulting in the first validated model of mercury capture within ESPs. By using the established particle size distribution of the activated carbon and actual or estimated values of its equilibrium mercury adsorption capacity, the incremental reduction in mercury concentration across each ESP can be predicted and compared to experimental results. Because the model does not incorporate kinetics associated with gas-phase mercury transformation or surface adsorption, the model predictions represent the mass-transfer-limited performance. Comparing field data to model results reveals many facilities performing at or near the predicted mass-transfer-limited maximum, particularly at low rates of sorbent injection. Where agreement is poor between field data and model predictions, additional chemical or physical phenomena may be responsible for reducing mercury removal efficiencies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 549.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 699.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Feeley, T.J., Jones, A.P. An Update on DOE/NETL’s Mercury Control Technology Field Testing Program. White paper available at http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/ coalpower/ewr/mercury/pubs/netl%20Hg%20program% 20white%20paper%20FINAL%20Jan2008.pdf(2008).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Srivastava, R.K., Hutson, N., Martin, B., Princiotta, F., Staudt, J. Control of Mercury Emissions from Coal-Fired Electric Utility Boilers: An Overview of the Status of Mercury Control Technologies. Environ. Sci. Technol., 2006, 40: 1385–1393.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pavlish, J.H., Sondreal, F.A., Mann, M.D., Olson, E.S., Galbreath, K.C., Laudal, D.L., Benson, S.A. Status review of mercury control options for coal-fired power plants. Fuel Proc. Technol., 2003, 82: 89–165.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee, C.W., Serre, S.D., Zhao, Y., Lee, S.J., Hastings, T.W. Mercury Oxidation Promoted by a Selective Catalytic Reduction Catalyst under Simulated Powder River Basin Coal Combustion Conditions. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 2008, 58: 484–493.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Becker, W. States’ Programs to Control Mercury from Coal-fired Power Plants. Presentation at Virginia Mercury Symposium, November 29, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Levin, L. New Perspectives on Mercury in the Human Environment. Written remarks delivered to Committee on Environment and Public Works, United States Senate, July 29, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jaffe, D, Strode, S. Sources, fate and transport of atmospheric mercury from Asia. Environ. Chem., 2008, 5: 121–126.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Clack, H. L. Mass transfer within electrostatic precipitators: trace gas adsorption by sorbent-covered plate electrodes. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 2006, 56: 759–766.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Clack, H. L. Mass transfer within electrostatic precipitators: in-flight adsorption of mercury by charged suspended particulates. Environ. Sci. Technol., 2006, 40: 3617–3622.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Clack, H. L. Particle size distribution effects on gas-particle mass transfer within electrostatic precipitators. Environ. Sci. Technol., 2006, 40: 3929–3933.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Clack, H.L. Bimodal Fly Ash Distributions and Their Influence on Gas-Particle Mass Transfer During Electrostatic Precipitation. Fuel Proc. Technol., 2006, 87: 987–996.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Scala, F., Clack, H. L. Mercury emissions from coal combustion: Modeling and comparison of Hg capture in a fabric filter versus an electrostatic precipitator. J. Haz. Materials, 2008, 152: 616–623.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Senior, C.L., Johnson, S.A. Impact of carbon-in-ash on mercury removal across particulate control devices in coal-fired power plants. Energy Fuels, 2005, 19: 859–863.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lu, Y., Rostam-Abadi, M., Chang, R., Richardson, C., Paradis, J. Characteristics of Fly Ashes from Full-scale Coal-fired Power Plants and Their Relationship to Mercury Adsorption. Energy Fuels, 2007, 21: 2112–2120.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. ADA Environmental Solutions. Brayton Point Generating Station Unit 1-Sorbent Injection into a Cold-side ESP for Mercury Control. Final Report, U.S. Dept. of Energy, Cooperative Agreement No. DE-FC26-00NT41005, March, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Presto, A. A., Granite, E.J. Impact of Sulfur Oxides on Mercury Capture by Activated Carbon. Environ. Sci. Technol., 2007, 41: 6579–6584.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Presto, A. A., Granite, E.J. Further Investigation of the Impact of Sulfur Oxides on Mercury Capture by Activated Carbon. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2007, 46: 8273–8276.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sjostrum, S., Wilson, C., Bustard, J., Spitznogle, G., Toole, A., O’Palko, A., Chang, R. Full-scale evaluation of carbon injection for mercury control at a unit firing high sulfur coal. In Proceedings of the U.S. EPA-DOE-EPRI Combined Power Plant Air Pollutant Control Symposium: The MEGA Symposium (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cushing, K.M., Heaphy, R.F., Jarvis, J., Wells, S., Berry, M.S., Irvin, N., Chang, R.L. Impact Of Flue Gas Characteristics And ESP Operating Variables On Mercury Removal And ESP Capture Of Activated Carbon. In Proceedings of Air Quality VI Conference, September 24–27, 2007, Crystal City, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  20. ADA Environmental Solutions. Pleasant Prairie Power Plant Unit 2 — Sorbent Injection into a Cold-side ESP for Mercury Control. Final Report, U.S. Dept. of Energy, Cooperative Agreement No. DE-FC26-00NT41005, May, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Zhejiang University Press, Hangzhou and Springer-Verlag GmbH Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Clack, H.L. (2009). Modeling Mercury Capture within ESPs: Continuing Development and Validation. In: Yan, K. (eds) Electrostatic Precipitation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89251-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics