Skip to main content

Neural Network Hydroinformatics: Maintaining Scientific Rigour

  • Chapter
Practical Hydroinformatics

Part of the book series: Water Science and Technology Library ((WSTL,volume 68))

Abstract

This chapter describes the current status of neural network hydrological modelling. Neural network modelling is now a regular feature in most peer-reviewed hydrological and water resource publications. The number of reported operational models is, nevertheless, restricted to a small handful of diverse implementations located in different parts of the world. The social and institutional reasons for this fundamental mismatch are discussed, and a requirement for stronger scientific rigour in modelling and reporting is highlighted. Eight potential guidelines for the development of a stronger scientific foundation are provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abrahart RJ, See LM (2007a) Neural network emulation of a rainfall-runoff model. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions 4: 287–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrahart RJ, See LM (2007b) Neural network modelling of non-linear hydrological relationships. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 11(5): 1563–1579

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrahart RJ, Kneale PE, See LM (2004) Neural Networks for Hydrological Modelling. Rotterdam, Taylor & Francis

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrahart RJ, White SM (2001) Modelling sediment transfer in Malawi: Comparing backpropagation neural network solutions against a multiple linear regression benchmark using small data sets. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth (B) 26(1): 19–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrahart RJ, See LM, Kneale PE (2001) Applying saliency analysis to neural network rainfall-runoff modelling. Computers and Geosciences 27: 921–928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aksoy H, Guven A, Aytek A, Yuce MI, Unal NE (2007) Discussion of “Generalized regression neural networks for evapotranspiration modelling” by O Kisi. Hydrological Sciences Journal 52(4): 825–828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alippi C (2002) Selecting accurate, robust, and minimal feedforward neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems – I: Fundamental Theory and Applications 49(12): 1799–1810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Society of Civil Engineers [Task Committee on Application of Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology] (2000a) I: Preliminary Concepts. Journal of Hydrological Engineering 5(2): 115–123

    Google Scholar 

  • American Society of Civil Engineers [Task Committee on Application of Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology] (2000b) Artificial neural networks in hydrology. II: Hydrologic applications. Journal of Hydrological Engineering 5(2): 124–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow DH, Hersen M (1984) Single Case Experimental Designs. 2nd Edition. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson CW, Abrahart RJ, See LM (2007) HydroTest: a web-based toolbox of evaluation metrics for the standardised assessment of hydrological forecasts. Environmental Modelling & Software 22(7): 1034–1052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson CW, Wilby R (1998) A artificial neural network approach to rainfall-runoff modelling. Hydrological Sciences Journal 43(1): 47–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson CW, Wilby RL (2001) Hydrological modelling using artificial neural networks. Progress in Physical Geography 25(1): 80–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniell TM (1991) Neural networks – applications in hydrology and water resources engineering. Proceedings, International Hydrology and Water Resources Symposium, Vol. 3, 797-802, Nat. Conf. Publ. 91/22, Inst. of Eng., Australia, Barton, ACT, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Dibike YB, Coulibaly P (2004) Temporal neural networks for downscaling climate variability and extremes. Neural Networks 19(2): 135–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French MN, Krajewski WF, Cuykendall RR (1992) Rainfall forecasting in space and time using a neural network. Journal of Hydrology 137 (1–4): 1–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govindaraju RS, Rao AR (2000) Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giustolisi O, Simeone V (2006) Optimal design of artificial neural networks by a multiobjective strategy: groundwater level predictions. Hydrological Sciences Journal 51(3): 502–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall MJ, Minns AW (1993) Rainfall-runoff modeling as a problem in artificial intelligence: experience with a neural network. BHS 4th National Hydrology Symposium, Cardiff 5.51–5.57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han D, Kwong T, Li S (2007) Uncertainties in real-time flood forecasting with neural networks. Hydrological Processes 21(2): 223–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey H, Han D (2002) The relevance of open source to hydroinformatics. Journal of Hydroinformatics 4(4): 219–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillel D (1986) Modeling in soil physics: A critical review. In: Future Developments in Soil Science Research, Soil Society of America. Madison, Wisconsin, USA, pp. 35–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu K-L, Gupta HV, Sorooshian S (1995) Artificial neural network modeling of the rainfall-runoff process. Water Resources Research 31(10): 2517–2530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain A, Sudheer KP, Srinivasulu S (2004) Identification of physical processes inherent in artificial neural network rainfall runoff models. Hydrological Processes 18(3): 571–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James LD (1970) Watershed modelling: an art or a science? Paper presented at the Winter Meeting, American Society of Agricultural Engineers, Chicago. Cited in McCuen RH (1973) The role of sensitivity analysis in hydrologic modelling. Journal of Hydrology 18(1): 37–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Kisi O (2007a) Reply to Discussion of “Generalized regression neural networks for evapotranspiration modelling” by H Aksoy et al. Hydrological Sciences Journal 52(4): 829–831

    Google Scholar 

  • Kisi O (2007b) Reply to Discussion of “Generalized regression neural networks for evapotranspiration modelling” by D Koutsoyiannis. Hydrological Sciences Journal 52(4): 836–839

    Google Scholar 

  • Koutsoyiannis D (2007) Discussion of “Generalized regression neural networks for evapotranspiration modelling” by O Kisi. Hydrological Sciences Journal 52(4): 832–835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone DJ, Manallack DT, Tetko IV (1997) Data modelling with neural networks: Advantages and limitations. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design 11(2): 135–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maier HR, Dandy GC (2000) Neural networks for the prediction and forecasting of water resources variables: a review of modelling issues and applications. Environmental Modelling & Software 15(1): 101–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore GA (2002) Crossing the Chasm: Marketing and Selling High-Tech Products to Mainstream Customers. HarperCollins Publishers Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Minns AW, Hall MJ (1996) Artificial neural networks as rainfall-runoff models, Hydrological Sciences Journal 41(3): 399–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajurkar M, Kothyari U, Chaube U (2004) Modeling of the daily rainfall-runoff relationship with artificial neural network. Journal of Hydrology 285: 96–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riad S, Mania J, Bouchaou L, Najjar Y (2004) Predicting catchment flow in a semi-arid region via an artificial neural network technique. Hydrological Processes 18(13): 2387–2393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed RD, Marks II RJ (1999) Neural Smithing: Supervised Learning in Feedforward Artificial Neural Networks., The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahoo GB, Ray C (2007) Reply to comments made on “Flow forecasting for a Hawaii stream using rating curves and neural networks” by W Sha. Journal of Hydrology 340(1–2): 122–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • See LM, Jain A, Dawson CW, Abrahart RJ (2008) Visualisation of hidden neuron behaviour in a neural network rainfall-runoff model. In: Abrahart RJ, See LM, Solomatine DP (eds) Practical Hydroinformatics: Computational Intelligence and Technological Developments in Water Applications. Springer-Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  • Sha W (2007) Comment on “Flow forecasting for a Hawaii stream using rating curves and neural networks” by GB Sahoo and C Ray. Journal of Hydrology 340(1–2): 119–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shamseldin AY (in press) Artificial neural network model for flood forecasting in a developing country. To appear in: Journal of Hydroinformatics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith J, Eli RN (1995) Neural network models of rainfall-runoff process. Journal of Water Resources Planning Management ASCE 121(6): 499–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sudheer KP, Jain A (2004) Explaining the internal behaviour of artificial neural network river flow models. Hydrological Processes 18(4): 833–844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sudheer KP (2005) Knowledge extraction from trained neural network river flow models. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 10(4): 264–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilby RL, Abrahart RJ, Dawson CW (2003) Detection of conceptual model rainfall-runoff processes inside an artificial neural network. Hydrological Sciences Journal 48(2): 163–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang QJ, Cudrak AA, Shariff R, Stanley SJ (2004a) Implementing artificial neural network models for real-time water colour forecasting in a water treatment plant. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Science 3 S1: 15–S23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang QJ, Smith DW, Baxter CW (2004b) Introduction. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Science 3 S1: iii–iv.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Abrahart, R., See, L., Dawson, C. (2009). Neural Network Hydroinformatics: Maintaining Scientific Rigour. In: Abrahart, R.J., See, L.M., Solomatine, D.P. (eds) Practical Hydroinformatics. Water Science and Technology Library, vol 68. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79881-1_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics