Abstract
This chapter describes the current status of neural network hydrological modelling. Neural network modelling is now a regular feature in most peer-reviewed hydrological and water resource publications. The number of reported operational models is, nevertheless, restricted to a small handful of diverse implementations located in different parts of the world. The social and institutional reasons for this fundamental mismatch are discussed, and a requirement for stronger scientific rigour in modelling and reporting is highlighted. Eight potential guidelines for the development of a stronger scientific foundation are provided.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abrahart RJ, See LM (2007a) Neural network emulation of a rainfall-runoff model. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions 4: 287–326
Abrahart RJ, See LM (2007b) Neural network modelling of non-linear hydrological relationships. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 11(5): 1563–1579
Abrahart RJ, Kneale PE, See LM (2004) Neural Networks for Hydrological Modelling. Rotterdam, Taylor & Francis
Abrahart RJ, White SM (2001) Modelling sediment transfer in Malawi: Comparing backpropagation neural network solutions against a multiple linear regression benchmark using small data sets. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth (B) 26(1): 19–24
Abrahart RJ, See LM, Kneale PE (2001) Applying saliency analysis to neural network rainfall-runoff modelling. Computers and Geosciences 27: 921–928
Aksoy H, Guven A, Aytek A, Yuce MI, Unal NE (2007) Discussion of “Generalized regression neural networks for evapotranspiration modelling” by O Kisi. Hydrological Sciences Journal 52(4): 825–828
Alippi C (2002) Selecting accurate, robust, and minimal feedforward neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems – I: Fundamental Theory and Applications 49(12): 1799–1810
American Society of Civil Engineers [Task Committee on Application of Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology] (2000a) I: Preliminary Concepts. Journal of Hydrological Engineering 5(2): 115–123
American Society of Civil Engineers [Task Committee on Application of Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology] (2000b) Artificial neural networks in hydrology. II: Hydrologic applications. Journal of Hydrological Engineering 5(2): 124–137
Barlow DH, Hersen M (1984) Single Case Experimental Designs. 2nd Edition. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon
Dawson CW, Abrahart RJ, See LM (2007) HydroTest: a web-based toolbox of evaluation metrics for the standardised assessment of hydrological forecasts. Environmental Modelling & Software 22(7): 1034–1052
Dawson CW, Wilby R (1998) A artificial neural network approach to rainfall-runoff modelling. Hydrological Sciences Journal 43(1): 47–66
Dawson CW, Wilby RL (2001) Hydrological modelling using artificial neural networks. Progress in Physical Geography 25(1): 80–108
Daniell TM (1991) Neural networks – applications in hydrology and water resources engineering. Proceedings, International Hydrology and Water Resources Symposium, Vol. 3, 797-802, Nat. Conf. Publ. 91/22, Inst. of Eng., Australia, Barton, ACT, Australia
Dibike YB, Coulibaly P (2004) Temporal neural networks for downscaling climate variability and extremes. Neural Networks 19(2): 135–144
French MN, Krajewski WF, Cuykendall RR (1992) Rainfall forecasting in space and time using a neural network. Journal of Hydrology 137 (1–4): 1–31
Govindaraju RS, Rao AR (2000) Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Amsterdam.
Giustolisi O, Simeone V (2006) Optimal design of artificial neural networks by a multiobjective strategy: groundwater level predictions. Hydrological Sciences Journal 51(3): 502–523
Hall MJ, Minns AW (1993) Rainfall-runoff modeling as a problem in artificial intelligence: experience with a neural network. BHS 4th National Hydrology Symposium, Cardiff 5.51–5.57.
Han D, Kwong T, Li S (2007) Uncertainties in real-time flood forecasting with neural networks. Hydrological Processes 21(2): 223–228
Harvey H, Han D (2002) The relevance of open source to hydroinformatics. Journal of Hydroinformatics 4(4): 219–234
Hillel D (1986) Modeling in soil physics: A critical review. In: Future Developments in Soil Science Research, Soil Society of America. Madison, Wisconsin, USA, pp. 35–42
Hsu K-L, Gupta HV, Sorooshian S (1995) Artificial neural network modeling of the rainfall-runoff process. Water Resources Research 31(10): 2517–2530
Jain A, Sudheer KP, Srinivasulu S (2004) Identification of physical processes inherent in artificial neural network rainfall runoff models. Hydrological Processes 18(3): 571–581
James LD (1970) Watershed modelling: an art or a science? Paper presented at the Winter Meeting, American Society of Agricultural Engineers, Chicago. Cited in McCuen RH (1973) The role of sensitivity analysis in hydrologic modelling. Journal of Hydrology 18(1): 37–53
Kisi O (2007a) Reply to Discussion of “Generalized regression neural networks for evapotranspiration modelling” by H Aksoy et al. Hydrological Sciences Journal 52(4): 829–831
Kisi O (2007b) Reply to Discussion of “Generalized regression neural networks for evapotranspiration modelling” by D Koutsoyiannis. Hydrological Sciences Journal 52(4): 836–839
Koutsoyiannis D (2007) Discussion of “Generalized regression neural networks for evapotranspiration modelling” by O Kisi. Hydrological Sciences Journal 52(4): 832–835
Livingstone DJ, Manallack DT, Tetko IV (1997) Data modelling with neural networks: Advantages and limitations. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design 11(2): 135–142
Maier HR, Dandy GC (2000) Neural networks for the prediction and forecasting of water resources variables: a review of modelling issues and applications. Environmental Modelling & Software 15(1): 101–124
Moore GA (2002) Crossing the Chasm: Marketing and Selling High-Tech Products to Mainstream Customers. HarperCollins Publishers Inc., New York
Minns AW, Hall MJ (1996) Artificial neural networks as rainfall-runoff models, Hydrological Sciences Journal 41(3): 399–417
Rajurkar M, Kothyari U, Chaube U (2004) Modeling of the daily rainfall-runoff relationship with artificial neural network. Journal of Hydrology 285: 96–113
Riad S, Mania J, Bouchaou L, Najjar Y (2004) Predicting catchment flow in a semi-arid region via an artificial neural network technique. Hydrological Processes 18(13): 2387–2393.
Reed RD, Marks II RJ (1999) Neural Smithing: Supervised Learning in Feedforward Artificial Neural Networks., The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Sahoo GB, Ray C (2007) Reply to comments made on “Flow forecasting for a Hawaii stream using rating curves and neural networks” by W Sha. Journal of Hydrology 340(1–2): 122–127
See LM, Jain A, Dawson CW, Abrahart RJ (2008) Visualisation of hidden neuron behaviour in a neural network rainfall-runoff model. In: Abrahart RJ, See LM, Solomatine DP (eds) Practical Hydroinformatics: Computational Intelligence and Technological Developments in Water Applications. Springer-Verlag
Sha W (2007) Comment on “Flow forecasting for a Hawaii stream using rating curves and neural networks” by GB Sahoo and C Ray. Journal of Hydrology 340(1–2): 119–121
Shamseldin AY (in press) Artificial neural network model for flood forecasting in a developing country. To appear in: Journal of Hydroinformatics.
Smith J, Eli RN (1995) Neural network models of rainfall-runoff process. Journal of Water Resources Planning Management ASCE 121(6): 499–508
Sudheer KP, Jain A (2004) Explaining the internal behaviour of artificial neural network river flow models. Hydrological Processes 18(4): 833–844
Sudheer KP (2005) Knowledge extraction from trained neural network river flow models. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 10(4): 264–269
Wilby RL, Abrahart RJ, Dawson CW (2003) Detection of conceptual model rainfall-runoff processes inside an artificial neural network. Hydrological Sciences Journal 48(2): 163–181
Zhang QJ, Cudrak AA, Shariff R, Stanley SJ (2004a) Implementing artificial neural network models for real-time water colour forecasting in a water treatment plant. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Science 3 S1: 15–S23
Zhang QJ, Smith DW, Baxter CW (2004b) Introduction. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Science 3 S1: iii–iv.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Abrahart, R., See, L., Dawson, C. (2009). Neural Network Hydroinformatics: Maintaining Scientific Rigour. In: Abrahart, R.J., See, L.M., Solomatine, D.P. (eds) Practical Hydroinformatics. Water Science and Technology Library, vol 68. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79881-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79881-1_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-79880-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-79881-1
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)