Skip to main content

From Norms to Interaction Patterns: Deriving Protocols for Agent Institutions

  • Conference paper
  • 424 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4908))

Abstract

We show how protocols (or interaction patterns) can be derived from norms using landmarks. The resulting protocols can be used by agents to perform their interactions while being certain to stay within the norms governing an e-institution without having to have a capability for normative reasoning. It can also be used by normative agents as a default protocol to be used, but from which they can deviate in specific circumstances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aldewereld, H., Dignum, F., Meyer, J.-J.C., Vázquez-Salceda, J.: Proving norm compliancy of protocols in electronic institutions. Technical Report UU-CS-2005-010, Utrecht University (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aldewereld, H.: Autonomy vs. Conformity: An Institutional Perspective on Norms and Protocols. PhD thesis, Universiteit Utrecht (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Aldewereld, H., Grossi, D., Vázquez-Salceda, J., Dignum, F.: Designing normative behaviour via landmarks. In: Bossier, O., et al. (eds.) Coordination, Organisation, Institutions and Norms in Agent Systems I, pp. 150–162. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Anderson, A.R.: A reduction of deontic logic to alethic modal logic. Mind 67, 100–103 (1958)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Belnap, N., Perloff, M.: Seeing to it that: A canonical form for agentives. Theoria 54, 175–199 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Büchi, J.R.: On a decision method in restricted second order arithmetic. In: Proceedings of the 1960 International Conference on Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, pp. 1–11. Stanford University Press, Stanford (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dastani, M., van Riemsdijk, B., Meyer, J.-J.C.: Programming multi-agent systems in 3apl. In: Bordini, R.H., et al. (eds.) Multi-Agent Programming: Languages, Platforms and Applications, Springer, Berlin (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dignum, F., Broersen, J., Dignum, V., Meyer, J.-J.C.: Meeting the deadline: Why, when and how. In: 3rd Goddard Workshop on Formal Approaches to Agent-Based Systems (FAABS), Maryland (April 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dignum, V.: A Model for Organizational Interaction: Based on Agents, Founded in Logic. PhD thesis, Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fikes, R., Nilsson, N.J.: Strips: A new approach to the application of theorem proving to problem solving. Artificial Intelligence 2(3/4), 189–208 (1971)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Holzmann, G.J.: The model checker spin. IEEE Transactions On Software Engineering 23(5), 279 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. López y López, F., Luck, M.: Towards a model of the dynamics of normative multi-agent systems. In: Lindemann, G., Moldt, D., Paolucci, M. (eds.) RASTA 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2934, pp. 175–194. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. P. Noriega. Agent-Mediated Auctions: The Fishmarket Metaphor. PhD thesis, Inst. d’Investigació en Intel.ligència Artificial (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rodriguez, J.A.: On the Design and Construction of Agent-mediated Electronic Institutions. PhD thesis, Inst. d’Investigació en Intel.ligència Artificial (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Staiger, L.: ω-languages. In: Rozenberg, G., Salomaa, A. (eds.) Handbook of Formal Languages, vol. 3, pp. 339–387. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Thomas, W.: Automata on infinite objects. In: van Leeuwen, J. (ed.) Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science, ch. 4, vol. B, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wolper, P.: Constructing Automata from Temporal Logic Formulas: A Tutorial. In: Brinksma, E., Hermanns, H., Katoen, J.-P. (eds.) EEF School 2000 and FMPA 2000. LNCS, vol. 2090, pp. 261–277. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Mehdi Dastani Amal El Fallah Seghrouchni Alessandro Ricci Michael Winikoff

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Aldewereld, H., Dignum, F., Meyer, JJ.C. (2008). From Norms to Interaction Patterns: Deriving Protocols for Agent Institutions. In: Dastani, M., El Fallah Seghrouchni, A., Ricci, A., Winikoff, M. (eds) Programming Multi-Agent Systems. ProMAS 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4908. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79043-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79043-3_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-79042-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-79043-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics