Skip to main content

Abstract

This paper evaluates methods for aggregating detailed flow pattern data extracted from DEM to larger spatial units suitable for representing the hydraulic and routing characteristics of large basins such as the Mackenzie. Five approaches to up-scaling flow data are discussed: simple averaging of DEM elevation data to coarser resolution, drainage enforcement that minimizes impact on the DEM outside the drainage network area, subdivision of drainage basins at various scales while the DEM resolution is held constant, vector averaging of sub-grid flow directions from a higher resolution DEM and a quasi-expert system approach based on the WATFLOOD parameterization scheme. Simple averaging has a profound impact on basin boundaries and flow patterns and cannot be used to generalize flow pattern data reliably. An objective approach based on vector addition is mathematically appropriate and effective in preserving the essential features of the sub-grid flow patterns. A quasi expert system approach developed by the automation of the WATFLOOD manual method of topographic parameterization is shown to be the superior approach to rescaling flow data for macro or regional scale hydrologic modeling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Armstrong RN, Martz LW (2003) Topographic parameterization in continental hydrology: a study in scale. Hydrol Process 17:3763–3781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arora VK, Chiew FHS, Grayson RB (2001) Effect of sub-grid variability of soil moisture and precipitation intensity on surface runoff and streamflow. J Geophys Res 106(D15):14347–14357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairfield J, Leymarie P (1991) Drainage networks from grid digital elevation models. Water Resour Res 27:29–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Fekete BM, Vörösmarty CJ, Lammers RB (2001) Scaling gridded river networks for macroscale hydrology: development, analysis, and control of error. Water Resour Res 37:1955–1967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florisnky IV (1998) Combined analysis of digital terrain models and remotely sensed data in landscape investigations. Prog Phys Geog 22:33–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Garbrecht J, Martz LW (1999) TOPAZ: an automated digital landscape analysis tool for topographic evaluation, drainage identification, watershed segmentation and subcatchment parameterization; TOPAZ overview. US Department of Agriculture, Agriculture and Research Service, Grazinglands Research Laboratory, USDA Agricultural Research Service, El Reno, Oklahoma

    Google Scholar 

  • Geomatics Canada (1996) Standards and specifications of the national topographic data base. Minister of Supply and Services Canada. Catalogue No. M52-70/1996E

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson MF (1989) A new procedure for gridding elevation and stream line data with automatic removal of spurious pits. J Hydrol 106:211–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jelinski DE, Wu J (1996) The modifiable areal unit problem and implications for landscape ecology. Landscape Ecol 11:129–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kite GW (1997) Manual for the SLURP hydrological model. NHRI, Saskatoon, Saskatachewan

    Google Scholar 

  • Kouwen N (2001) WATFLOOD/SPL8 flood forecasting system. University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacroix M, Martz LW, Kite GW, Garbrecht J (2002) Using digital terrain analysis modeling techniques for the parameterization of a hydrological model. Environ Modell Softw 17:127–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Martz LW, deJong E (1988) CATCH: A FORTRAN program for measuring catchment area from digital elevation models. Comput Geosci 14:627–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martz LW, Garbrecht J (1998) The treatment of flat areas and depressions in automated drainage analysis of raster digital elevation models. Hydrol Process 12:843–855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martz LW, Garbrecht J (1992) Numerical definition of drainage network and subcatchment areas from digital elevation models. Comput Geosci 18:747–761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Callaghan JF, Mark DM (1984) The extraction of drainage networks from digital elevation data. Comput Vision Graph 4:375–387

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell G, Nijssen B, Lettenmaier DP (1999) A simple algorithm for generating streamflow networks for grid-based, macroscale hydrological models. Hydrol Process 13:1269–1275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olivera F, Lear MS, Famiglietti JS, Asante K (2002) Extracting low-resolution river networks from high-resolution digital elevation models. Water Resour Res 38:1231,doi:10.1029/2001WR000726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pietroniro A, Soulis ED (2003) A hydrology modelling framework for the Mackenzie GEWEX programme. Hydrol Process 17:673–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pomeroy JW, Granger RJ (1999) Wolf Creek Research Basin — hydrology, ecology, environment. National Water Research Institute, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw D, Martz LW, Pietroniro A (2005a) Flow routing in large-scale models using vector addition. J Hydrol 307:38–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw D, Martz LW, Pietroniro A (2005b) A methodology for preserving channel flow networks and connectivity patterns in large-scale distributed hydrological models. Hydrol Process 19:149–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soulis ED, Segleniek FR (2007) The MAGS integrated modeling system (Vol. II, this book)

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas G, Finney R (1979 ) Calculus and analytic geometry. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne R, Armstrong RN, Woo MK, Martz LW (2007) Lessons from macroscale hydrological modeling: experience with the hydrological model SLURP in the Mackenzie Basin. (Vol. II, this book)

    Google Scholar 

  • Veregin H (1997) The effects of vertical errors in digital elevation models on the determination of flow-path directions. Cartogr Geogr Infom 24:67–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolock DM, McCabe GJ (2000) Differences in topographic characteristics computed from 100-m, 1000-m resolution digital elevation model data. Hydrol Process 14:987–1002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Drake NA, Wainwright J, Mulligan M (1999) Comparison of slope estimates from low resolution DEMs: scaling issues and fractal method for their solution. Earth Surf Proc Land 24:763–769

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Martz, L.W., Pietroniro, A., Shaw, D.A., Armstrong, R.N., Laing, B., Lacroix, M. (2008). Re-Scaling River Flow Direction Data from Local to Continental Scales. In: Woo, Mk. (eds) Cold Region Atmospheric and Hydrologic Studies. The Mackenzie GEWEX Experience. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75136-6_20

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics