Abstract
A better understanding of “human error” is needed to help overcome problems of people assuming they are to blame for their inability to use poorly designed technology. In order to investigate people’s ability to recognize, and reflect on the causes of, particular types of errors, a problem solving environment was designed that allowed participants to verbally self-report erroneous and exploratory interactions. It was found that the pervasiveness of errors was recognizable but underlying cognitive and attentional causes of errors were not. Participants found that providing a causal account of device-specific errors during interaction was especially difficult. A striking feature of device-specific errors is that they involve actions that do not move an individual towards a goal state, but remain critical to performing a task correctly. Successfully identifying why an error has occurred requires an understanding of environmental cues and salience. Findings imply that HCI practitioners need to develop techniques to adjust the visual salience of cues, making it is possible to recognize and recover from error.
Chapter PDF
References
Byrne, M., Bovair, S.: A Working Memory Model of a Common Procedural Error. Cognitive Science 21(1), 31–69 (1997)
Reason, J.T.: Human Error. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (1990)
Reason, J.T., Lucas, D.A.: Using cognitive diaries to investigate naturally occurring memory blocks. In: Harris, J., Morris, P. (eds.) Everyday Memory, Actions and Absent-Mindedness, Academic Press, London (1984)
Johnson, C.W.: Representing the Impact of Time on Human Error and Systems Failure. Interacting with Computers 11, 53–86 (1998)
Gray, W.D.: The nature and processing of errors in interactive behavior. Cognitive Science 24(2), 205–248 (2000)
Back, J., Cheng, W.L., Dann, R., Curzon, P., Blandford, A.: Does being motivated to avoid procedural errors influence their systematicity? People and Computers XX - Engage. In: Proceedings of HCI 2006, London, UK, vol. 1 (2006)
Rasmussen, J., Jensen, A.: Mental procedures in real-life tasks: A case of electronic troubleshooting. Ergonomics 17, 293–307 (1974)
Hollnagel, E., Mancini, G., Woods, D.: Cognitive Engineering in Complex Dynamic Worlds. Academic Press, London (1988)
Hollnagel, E.: Cognitive reliability and error analysis method. Elsevier, Oxford, UK (1998)
Broadbent, D., Cooper, P., FitzGerald, P., Parkes, K.: The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ) and its correlates. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 21, 1–16 (1982)
Ericsson, K.A., Simon, H.A.: Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (rev. ed.). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1993)
Perkins, D.: The mind’s best work. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA (1981)
Altmann, E., Trafton, J.: Memory for goals: an activation-based model. Cognitive Science 26(1), 39–83 (2002)
Mandler, G.: Consciousness: Respectable, useful, and probably necessary. In: Solso, R. (ed.) Information Processing and Cognition, Erlbaum, NJ (1975)
Norman, D.: Categorization of action slips. Psychological Review 88(1), 1–15 (1981)
Miller, G.: Human memory and the storage of information. IRE Transactions on Information Theory IT-2(3), 128–137 (1956)
Hoc, J., Leplat, J.: Evaluation of different modalities of verbalization in a sorting task. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 18, 283–306 (1983)
Fischhoff, B.: Hindsight ≠ foresight: the effect of outcome knowledge on judgement under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1, 288–299 (1975)
Flach, J.M.: For those condemned to live in the future. Quality and Safety in Health Care 12, 304–312 (2003)
Woods, D. D., Johannesen, L. J., Cook, R. I., Sarter, N. B.: Behind human error: Cognitive systems, computers, complexity and hindsight. CSERIAC, 94–101 (1994)
Blandford, A., Back, J., Curzon, P., Li, S., Ruksenas, R.: Reasoning about human error by modeling cognition and interaction. In: Proc. Resilience Engineering Symposium (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Back, J., Blandford, A., Curzon, P. (2007). Recognising Erroneous and Exploratory Interactions. In: Baranauskas, C., Palanque, P., Abascal, J., Barbosa, S.D.J. (eds) Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2007. INTERACT 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4663. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74800-7_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74800-7_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-74799-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-74800-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)