Skip to main content

Abstract

Within collective pension plans, the uniform contribution rates cause considerable redistribution. Women benefit more from the retirement pension than men, while benefiting less from the partner's pension. Single people benefit less from schemes than partnered members. The option of exchanging the accrued partner's pension for supplementary retirement pension has made the differences smaller, however. Additionally, the inequality between employees with longer and short careers has decreased due to the transition from final pay to average earnings schemes. When calculating their premiums, life insurers do make distinctions between characteristics of the members. However, the costs of private insurance products are so high, that nevertheless nearly everyone is cheaper off with a collective pension.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature

  • Consumentenbond, ‘Lijfrente naar uw partner’, Geldgids, July edition, pp. 40–42, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Consumentenbond, ‘Parels uit de eerste divisie’, Geldgids, July edition, pp. 46–49, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cui, J., F. de Jong, E. Ponds, Intergenerational risk sharing within funded pension schemes, unpublished paper, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hári, N., R. Koijen and Th. E. Nijman, The determinants of the money’s worth of participation in collective pension schemes, unpublished paper, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teulings, C.N., and C.G. de Vries, ‘Generational accounting, solidarity and pension losses’, De Economist, vol. 154, no. 1, 2006, pp. 63–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westerhout, E., M. van de Ven, C. van Ewijk and N. Draper, Naar een schokbestendig pensioenstelsel — verkenning van enkele beleidopties op pensioengebied, The Hague: CPB Document no. 67, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Aarssen, K., Kuipers, B.J. (2007). Everyone gains, but some more than others. In: Steenbeek, O., van der Lecq, F. (eds) Costs and Benefits of Collective Pension Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74374-3_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics