Abstract
Technical systems of different kinds might differ in the mental demands they put on their users while being equally usable in a more conventional sense. Several methods exist that measure mental workload. However, in the everyday practice of usability evaluations, none of these methods seems to be used. This is probably due to the amount of effort needed to use them. The study of our errors in estimation of durations show that errors increase as a function of the amount of attentional resources being needed for other concurrent tasks. This points towards a simple way of estimating mental workload. By asking people to provide estimates of elapsed time after a task, disruptions in their estimates could indicate the mental workload of the task. We conducted a first study aimed at validating this idea with the NASA TLX method. Results show that errors in time estimates correlate significantly with TLX scores.
Chapter PDF
References
Arnetz, B.B.: Techno-stress: a prospective psychophysiological study of the impact of a controlled stress-reduction program in advanced telecommunication systems design work. J. Occup. Environ Med. 38, 53–65 (1996)
Stanton, N.A., Salmon, P.M., Walker, G.H., Baber, C., Jenkins, D.P.: Human Facotrs Methods, A Practical Guide for Engineering and Design. Ashgate Publishing Limited, Aldershot (2005)
Baddeley, A.D.: Is working memory still working? Am Psychol 56, 851–864 (2001)
Brown, S.W.: Attentional resources in timing: interference effects in concurrent temporal and nontemporal working memory tasks. Percept Psychophys 59, 1118–1140 (1997)
Fortin, C., Breton, R.: Temporal interval production and processing in working memory. Percept Psychophys 57, 203–215 (1995)
Zakay, D., Block, R.A.: Temporal cognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science 6, 12–16 (1997)
Zakay, D.: Gating or switching? Gating is a better model of prospective timing (a response to ’switching or gating?’ by Lejeune)(1). Behav Processes 52, 63–69 (2000)
Venneri, A., Pestell, S., Nichelli, P.: A preliminary study of the cognitive mechanisms supporting time estimation. Percept Mot Skills 96, 1093–1106 (2003)
Jex, H.R.: Measuring mental workload: Problems, progress, and promises. In: Hancock, P.A., Meshkati, N. (eds.) Human Mental Workload, vol. 52, Elsevier science publishers, Amsterdam (1988)
ISO: ISO 9241-11:1998 Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) – Part 11: Guidance on usability. ISO (1998)
Hart, S.G., Staveland, L.E.: Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research. In: Hancock, P.A., Meshkati, N. (eds.) Human Mental Workload, vol. 52, Elsevier science publishers, Amsterdam (1988)
Hays, W.L.: Statistics for the social sciences. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York (1973)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lind, M., Sundvall, H. (2007). Time Estimation as a Measure of Mental Workload. In: Harris, D. (eds) Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. EPCE 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4562. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73331-7_39
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73331-7_39
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-73330-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-73331-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)