Skip to main content

Key Aspects of Grant Applications: The Surgical Viewpoint

  • Chapter
Key Topics in Surgical Research and Methodology

Abstract

In this chapter, we begin by examining the background of funding for surgical research, the relevance of surgical research and the unique aspects of the surgical research proposal. We shall consider different types of grant application and funding agency, the grant review process and shall use these considerations as the backdrop upon which the principles and mechanics of writing a grant proposal shall be described. Both clinical and basic science research applications will be considered and we shall conclude by discussing the programme grant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Jones R, Debas H (2004) Research: a vital component of optimal patient care in the United States. Ann Surg 240:573–577

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jackson HH, Jackson JD, Mulvihill SJ et al (2004) Trends in research support and productivity in the changing environment of academic surgery. J Surg Res 116:197–201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rangel SJ, Efron B, Moss L (2002) Recent trends in national institutes of health funding of surgical research. Ann Surg 236:277–287

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nahrwold DL, Pereira SG, Dupuis J (1995) United States research published in major surgical journals is decreasing. Ann Surg 222:263–269

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Avis FP, Ellenberg S, Friedman MA (1988) Surgical oncology research: a disappointing status report. Surg Oncol Res 207:262–266

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Harken AD (2001) The role, focus and funding of research in a department of surgery. Arch Surg 136:154–157

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Souba WW, Wilmore DW (2000) Judging surgical research: how should we evaluate performance and measure value. Ann Surg 232:32–41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Coran AG, Blackman PM, Sikina C et al (1999) Speciality networking in pediatric surgery: a paradigm for the future of academic surgery. Ann Surg 230:331–339

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Roberts WC (1990) Limited research funds and cardiac medicine without cardiac surgery. Am J Cardiol 65:536–537

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gross CP, Anderson GF, Powe NR (1999) The relation between funding by the National Institutes of Health and the burden of disease. N Engl J Med 340:1881–1887

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dickler HB, Fang D, Heinig SJ et al (2007) New physician-investigators receiving national institutes of health research project grants. JAMA 297:2496–2501

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Berger DH (2005) An introduction to obtaining extramural funding. J Surg Res 128:226–231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Aggarwal W, Hance J, Darzi A (2004) Robotics and surgery: a long-term relationship? Int J Surg 2:106–109

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Weil RJ (2004) The future of surgical research. PLoS Med 1:17–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ozomaro U, Gitierrez JC, Byrne MM et al (2007) How important is the contribution of surgical specialties to a medical school's NIH funding. J Surg Res 141:16–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ascoli GA (2007) Biomedical research funding: when the game gets tough, winners start to play. BioEssays 29:933–936

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Robertson CM, Klingensmith ME, Coopersmith CM (2007) Long-term outcomes of performing a postdoctoral research fellowship during general surgery residency. Ann Surg 245:516–523

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Greene AK (2000) Research funding for surgical residents. Curr Surg 57:332–334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Toledo-Pereyra LH (2001) Surgical research funding. J Invest Surg 14:299–300

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Niederhuber JE (1985) Writing a successful grant application. J Surg Res 39:277–284

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Derish PA, Maa J, Ascher NL et al (2007) Enhancing the mission of academic surgery by promoting scientific writing skills. J Surg Res 140:177–183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Inouye SK, Fiellin DA (2005) An evidence-based guide to writing grant proposals for clinical research. Ann Intern Med 142:274–282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Web Links

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Murtuza, B., Athanasiou, T. (2010). Key Aspects of Grant Applications: The Surgical Viewpoint. In: Athanasiou, T., Debas, H., Darzi, A. (eds) Key Topics in Surgical Research and Methodology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71915-1_44

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71915-1_44

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-71914-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-71915-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics