Skip to main content

Modeling Mental States in the Analysis of Multiagent Systems Requirements

  • Conference paper
Agent-Oriented Software Engineering VII (AOSE 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 4405))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 325 Accesses

Abstract

This paper describes an agent-oriented requirements engineering approach that combines informal i * models with formal specifications in the multiagent system specification formalism CASL. This allows the requirements engineer to exploit the complementary features of the frameworks. i *can be used to model social dependencies between agents and how process design choices affect the agents’ goals. CASL can be used to model complex processes formally. We introduce an intermediate notation to support the mapping between i * models and CASL specifications. In the combined i *-CASL framework, agents’ goals and knowledge are represented as their mental states, which allows for the formal analysis and verification of, among other things, complex agent interactions where agents may have different goals and different (incomplete) knowledge. Our models can also serve as high-level specifications for multiagent systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Castro, J., Kolp, M., Mylopoulos, J.: Towards Requirements-Driven Information Systems Engineering: The Tropos Project. Information Systems 27(6), 365–389 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Chung, L.K., et al.: Non-Functional Requirements in Software Engineering. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Dardenne, A., van Lamsweerde, A., Fickas, S.: Goal-Directed Requirements Acquisitions. Science of Computer Programming 20, 3–50 (1993)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. De Giacomo, G., Lespérance, Y., Levesque, H.: ConGolog, A Concurrent Programming Language Based on the Situation Calculus. Artificial Intelligence 121, 109–169 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Fuxman, A., et al.: Specifying and Analyzing Early Requirements in Tropos. RE Journal 9(2), 132–150 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gans, G., et al.: Requirements Modeling for Organization Networks: A (Dis-)Trust-Based Approach. In: Proc. RE’01, pp. 154–163 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jennings, N.R.: Agent-Oriented Software Engineering. In: Garijo, F.J., Boman, M. (eds.) MAAMAW 1999. LNCS, vol. 1647, pp. 1–7. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Lapouchnian, A.: Modeling Mental States in Requirements Engineering — An Agent-Oriented Framework Based on i * and CASL. M.Sc. Thesis. Department of Computer Science, York University, Toronto (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lespérance, Y.: On the Epistemic Feasibility of Plans in Multiagent Systems Specifications. In: Meyer, J.-J.C., Tambe, M. (eds.) ATAL 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2333, pp. 69–85. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. McCarthy, J., Hayes, P.: Some Philosophical Problems From the Standpoint of Artificial Intelligence. Machine Intelligence 4, 463–502 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Moore, R.C.: A Formal Theory of Knowledge and Action. In: Hobbs, J.R., Moore, R.C. (eds.) Formal Theories of the Common Sense World, pp. 319–358. Ablex Publishing, Westport (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Odell, J., Van Dyke Parunak, H., Bauer, B.: Extending UML for Agents. In: Proc. AOIS-2000, Austin, TX, USA, pp. 3–17 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Padgham, L., Lambrix, P.: Agent Capabilities: Extending BDI Theory. In: Proc. AAAI-2000, Austin, TX, USA, pp. 68–73 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rao, A.S., Georgeff, M.P.: Modeling Rational Agents within a BDI Architecture. In: Proc. KR’91, pp. 473–484 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Reiter, R.: The Frame Problem in the Situation Calculus: A Simple Solution (Sometimes) and a Completeness Result for Goal Regression. In: Lifschitz, V. (ed.) Artificial Intelligence and Mathematical Theory of Computation: Papers in Honor of John McCarthy, pp. 359–380. Academic Press, London (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Reiter, R.: Knowledge in Action: Logical Foundations for Specifying and Implementing Dynamical Systems. MIT Press, Cambridge (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Scherl, R.B., Levesque, H.: Knowledge, Action, and the Frame Problem. Artificial Intelligence 144(1–2), 1–39 (2003)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Shapiro, S.: Specifying and Verifying Multiagent Systems Using CASL. Ph.D. Thesis. Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shapiro, S., Lespérance, Y.: Modeling Multiagent Systems with the Cognitive Agents Specification Language — A Feature Interaction Resolution Application. In: Castelfranchi, C., Lespérance, Y. (eds.) ATAL 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1986, pp. 244–259. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Shapiro, S., Lespérance, Y., Levesque, H.: The Cognitive Agents Specification Language and Verification Environment for Multiagent Systems. In: Proc. AAMAS’02, Bologna, Italy, pp. 19–26. ACM Press, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shapiro, S., et al.: Iterated Belief Change in the Situation Calculus. In: Proc. KR-2000, pp. 527–538 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  22. van Lamsweerde, A., Darimont, R., Massonet, P.: Goal-Directed Elaboration of Requirements for a Meeting Scheduler: Problems and Lessons Learnt. In: Proc. RE’95, York, UK, pp. 194–203 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  23. van Otterloo, S., van der Hoek, W., Wooldrige, M.: Model Checking a Knowledge Exchange Scenario. Applied Artificial Intelligence 18(9-10), 937–952 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang, X., Lespérance, Y.: Agent-Oriented Requirements Engineering Using ConGolog and i *. In: Proc. AOIS-01, pp. 59–78 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wooldridge, M.: Agent-Based Software Engineering. IEE Proceedings on Software Engineering 144(1), 26–37 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yolum, P., Singh, M.P.: Commitment Machines. In: Meyer, J.-J.C., Tambe, M. (eds.) ATAL 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2333, pp. 235–247. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Yu, E.: Towards modeling and reasoning support for early requirements engineering. In: Proc. RE’97, Annapolis, USA, pp. 226–235 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Lin Padgham Franco Zambonelli

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lapouchnian, A., Lespérance, Y. (2007). Modeling Mental States in the Analysis of Multiagent Systems Requirements. In: Padgham, L., Zambonelli, F. (eds) Agent-Oriented Software Engineering VII. AOSE 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4405. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70945-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70945-9_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-70944-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-70945-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics