Abstract
Biodiversity conservation is increasingly one of the multiple outcomes for which landscapes are managed, alas, this may not be as straight-forward as we would like. Despite our intentions, we tend to look at landscapes from a human perspective, but when we are aiming to conserve biodiversity this perspective can be decidedly unhelpful. Other biota do not perceive landscapes in the same way as people do, nor is one species’ ‘view’ necessarily like another.
Biodiversity research within the highly modified landscapes of Australia reinforces our understanding that different taxa w— even from within the same family of organisms — can have strikingly different needs for persistence in a landscape. Different organisms can respond in completely different ways to the same landscape change, some for better, some for worse. The notion that a landscape can have — or at some time in the past has had — a single state that is ‘best’ is fanciful. One must always ask ‘best for what?’ for as soon as a change is made to improve the lot of one group or taxon, another may suffer.
Landscape managers have many tools at their disposal to help take in these varied perspectives. Firstly mapping and modelling of climate, terrain, hydrological, pedological and geological features are an important start, especially in helping to inform our understanding of the temporal and spatial distribution of both biota and biologically important processes. Secondly the mapping and modelling of vegetation distribution, type and condition is an important output in its own right and is also an important input to higher biodiversity related analyses. Finally we can map and model the movement of biota or biological entities (such as pollen or genes) throughout landscapes, both explicitly and implicitly. A present challenge is for us to learn to integrate these tools in order that we avoid unintended bias in our analyses.
Whenever we seek to map, model, ‘design’ or in any way understand landscapes we need to ask ourselves ‘whose view will do?’ If our objective is a landscape that is ‘best’ for humans then our task is (relatively) easy. However, if our objective is a landscape that is ‘best’ for non-human biodiversity then typically there is no ‘right’ answer, there is no ‘best’ outcome. We simply must be clear about our landscape objective and then do our best to ‘view’ the landscape with the appropriate — likely multiple, and hopefully well integrated — perspectives.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Appleton J (1975) Experience of landscape. John Wiley, London
Appleton J (1995) Experience of landscape, revised. John Wiley, Chichester
Austin MP (2002) Spatial prediction of species distribution: an interface between ecological theory and statistical modelling. Ecological Modelling 157(2– 3):101–118
Bennett AF, Ford LA (1997) Land use, habitat change and the conservation of birds in fragmented rural environments: a landscape perspective from the northern plains, Victoria. Pacific Conservation Biology 3:244–261
Bougher NL, Tommerup IC (1996) Conservation significance of ectomycorrhizal fungi in Western Australia: their co-evolution with indigenous vascular plants and mammals. In: Hopper SD, Chappill J, Harvey M, George R (eds) Gondwanan heritage: past, present and future of the Western Australian biota. Surrey Beatty and Sons, Chipping Norton
Bradstock RA, Tozer MG, Keith DA (1997) Effects of high frequency fire on floristic composition and abundance in a fire-prone heathland near Sydney. Australian Journal of Botany 45:641–655
Braithwaite LW, Stewart DA (1975) Dynamics of water bird populations on the Alice Springs Sewage Farm, Northern Territory. Wildlife Research 2:85–90
Bren LJ (2005) The changing hydrology of the Barmah-Millewa forests and its effects on vegetation Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria 117:61–76
Brooker L (2002) The application of focal species knowledge to landscape design in agricultural lands using the ecological neighbourhood as a template. Landscape and Urban Planning, 60:185–210
Buckley YM, Anderson S, Catterall CP, Corlett RT, Engel T, Gosper CR, Nathan R, Richardson DM, Setter M, Spiegel O, Vivian-Smith G, Voigt FA, Weir JES, Westcott DA (2006) Management of plant invasions mediated by frugivore interactions. Journal of Applied Ecology 43 (5):848–857
Cunningham SA (2000) Effects of habitat fragmentation on the reproductive ecology of four plant species in mallee woodland. Conservation Biology 14:758– 768
Dennis RLH, Shreeve TG, Van Dyck H (2003) Towards a functional resourcebased concept for habitat: a butterfly biology viewpoint. Oikos 102:417–426
Doherty M, Kearns A, Barnett G, Sarre A, Hochuli D, Gibb H, Dickman C (2000) The interaction between habitat conditions, ecosystem processes and terrestrial biodiversity: a review. Environment Australia, Canberra
Drielsma M, Manion G, Ferrier S (2007) The spatial links tool: automated mapping of habitat linkages in variegated landscapes. Ecological Modelling 200:403–411
Dufty AC (1994) Habitat and spatial requirements of the eastern barred bandicoot (Perameles gunnii) at Hamilton, Victoria. Wildlife Research 21:459–71
English V, Blyth J (2000) Interim recovery plan: shrubland and woodlands on Muchea limestone. Interim recovery plan 57, 2000–2003, Department of Conservation and Land Management, Wanneroo, Western Australia
Fensham RJ, Fairfax RJ (1997) The use of the land survey record to reconstruct pre-European vegetation patterns in the Darling Downs, Queensland, Australia. Journal of Biogeography 24:827–836
Fensham RJ, Holman JE, Cox MJ (1999) Plant species responses along a grazing disturbance gradient in Australian grassland. Journal of Vegetation Science 10(1):77–86
Freudenberger D, Brooker L (2004) Development of the focal species approach for biodiversity conservation in the temperate agricultural zones of Australia. Biodiversity and Conservation 13:253–274
Frith HJ, Brown BK, Barker RD (1974) Food of the crested and common bronzewing pigeons in inland New South Wales Australian. Wildlife Research 1:129–144
Gibson LA, Wilson BA, Cahill DM, Hill J (2004) Modelling habitat suitability of the swamp antechinus (Antechinus minimus maritimus) in the coastal heathlands of southern Victoria. Australia Biological Conservation 117 (2):143– 150
Guisan A, Zimmermann NE (2000) Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecological Modelling 135(2–3):147–186
Hazell D (2003) Frog ecology in modified Australian landscapes: a review. Wildlife Research 30:193–205
Hazell D, Hero J-M, Lindenmayer D, Cunningham R (2004) A comparison of constructed and natural habitat for frog conservation in an Australian agricultural landscape. Biological Conservation 119(1):61–71
Henle K, Lindenmayer DB, Margules CR, Saunders DA, Wissel C (2004) Species survival in fragmented landscapes: where are we now? Biodiversity and Conservation 13 (1):1–8
Hilbert DW, Ostendorf B (2001) The utility of artificial neural networks for modelling the distribution of vegetation in past, present and future climates. Ecological Modelling 146(1–3):311–327
Hodgson P, French K, Major RE (2007) Avian movement across abrupt ecological edges: differential responses to housing density in an urban matrix. Landscape and Urban Planning 79:266–272
James CD, Landsberg J, Morton SR (1999) Provision of watering points in the Australian arid zone: a review of effects on biota. Journal of Arid Environments 41(1):87–121
Jansen A, Robertson AI (2005) Grazing, ecological condition and biodiversity in riparian river red gum forests in south-eastern Australia. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria 117:85–95
Jenkins KM, Boulton AJ, Ryder DS (2005) A common parched future? Research and management of Australian arid-zone floodplain wetlands. Hydrobiologia 552:57–73
Kearns CA, Inouye DW, Waser NM (1998) Endangered mutualisms: the conservation of plant-pollinator interactions. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 29:83–112
Law BS (2001) The diet of the common blossom bat (Syconycteris australis) in upland tropical rainforest and the importance of riparian areas. Wildlife Research 28:619–626
Lunt ID (1998a) Two hundred years of land use and vegetation change in a remnant coastal woodland in southern Australia. Australian Journal of Botany 46:629–647
Lunt ID (1998b) Allocasuarina (Casuarinaceae) invasion of an unburnt coastal woodland at Ocean Grove, Victoria: structural changes 1971–1996. Australian Journal of Botany 46:649–656
McAlpine CA, Rhodesa JR, Callaghan JG, Bowen ME, Lunney D, Mitchell DL, Pullar DV, Possingham HP (2006) The importance of forest area and configuration relative to local habitat factors for conserving forest mammals: A case study of koalas in Queensland, Australia. Biological Conservation 132(2):153–165
McIntyre S, Lavorel S (2007) A conceptual model of land use effects on the structure and function of herbaceous vegetation. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 119:11–21
McKenzie NJ, Ryan PJ (1999) Spatial prediction of soil properties using environmental correlation. Geoderma 89(1–2):67–94
Miller B (1979) Ecology of the little black cormorant, Phalacrocorax sulcirostris, and little pied cormorant, P. melanoleucos, in inland New South Wales: food and feeding habits. Wildlife Research 6:79–95
Miller C (2000) Vegetation and habitat are not synonyms. Ecological Management and Restoration 2:102–104
Moisen GG, Frescino TS (2002) Comparing five modelling techniques for predicting forest characteristics. Ecological Modelling 157:209–225
Murphy MT, Garkaklis MJ, Hardy GEStJ (2005) Seed caching by woylies Bettongia penicillata can increase sandalwood Santalum spicatum regeneration in Western Australia. Austral Ecology 30(7):747–755
Newell GR, White MD, Griffioen P, Conroy M (2006) Vegetation condition mapping at a landscape-scale across Victoria. Ecological Management and Restoration 7:S65–S68
Overton I C (2005) Modelling floodplain inundation on a regulated river: integrating GIS, remote sensing and hydrological models. River Research and Applications 21(9):991–1001
Parkes D, Newell G, Cheal D (2003) Assessing the quality of native vegetation: the ‘habitat hectares’ approach. Ecological Management and Restoration 4:S29–S38
Pickup G, Marks A (2000) Identifying large-scale erosion and deposition processes from airborne gamma radiometrics and digital elevation models in a weathered landscape. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 25:535–557
Pickup MA, McDougall KL, Whelan RJ (2003) Fire and flood: soil-stored seed bank and germination ecology in the endangered Carrington Falls grevillea (Grevillea rivularis, Proteaceae). Austral Ecology 28:128–136
Prober SM, Thiele KR, Lunt ID (2007) Fire frequency regulates tussock grass composition, structure and resilience in endangered temperate woodlands. Austral Ecology 32(7):808–824
Reid N (1989) Dispersal of mistletoes by honeyeaters and flowerpeckers: components of seed dispersal quality. Ecology 70(1):137–145
Shine R, Fitzgerald M (1996) Large snakes in a mosaic rural landscape: the ecology of carpet pythons Morelia spilota (serpentes: pythonidae) in coastal eastern Australia. Biological Conservation 76(2):113–122
Urban D, Keitt T (2001) Landscape connectivity: a graph-theoretic perspective. Ecology 82:1205–1218
Wallace JF, Caccetta PA, Kiiveri HT (2004) Recent developments in analysis of spatial and temporal data for landscape qualities and monitoring. Austral Ecology 29(1):100–107
Westcott DA, Bentrupperböumer J, Bradford MG, McKeown A (2005) Incorporating patterns of disperser behaviour into models of seed dispersal and its effects on estimated dispersal curves. Oecologia 146(1):57–67
Westcott DA, Setter M, Bradford MG, Setter S (in press) Cassowary dispersal of the invasive pond apple in a tropical rainforest: the contribution of secondary dispersal modes in invasion, diversity and distribution
Williams BG, Baker GC (1982) An electromagnetic induction technique for reconnaissance surveys of soil salinity hazards. Australian Journal of Soil Research 20(2):107–118
Williams GA, Adam P, Mound LA (2001) Thrips (Thysanoptera) pollination in Australian subtropical rainforests, with particular reference to pollination of Wilkiea huegeliana (Monimiaceae). Journal of Natural History 35(1):1–21
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Smith, F.P. (2008). Looking at Landscapes for Biodiversity: Whose View Will Do?. In: Pettit, C., Cartwright, W., Bishop, I., Lowell, K., Pullar, D., Duncan, D. (eds) Landscape Analysis and Visualisation. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69168-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69168-6_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-69167-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69168-6
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)