Skip to main content

Abstract

Reinforcement learning constructs knowledge containing state-to-action decision rules from agent’s experiences. Most of reinforcement learning methods are action-value estimation methods which estimate the true values of state-action pairs and derive the optimal policy from the value estimates. However, these methods have a serious drawback that they stray when the values for the “opposite” actions, such as moving left and moving right, are equal. This paper describes the basic mechanism of on-line profit-sharing (OnPS) which is an action-preference learning method. The main contribution of this paper is to show the equivalence of off-line and on-line in profit sharing. We also show a typical benchmark example for comparison between OnPS and Q-learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arai, S., Sycara, K., Payne, T.R.: Experience-based reinforcement learning to acquire effective behavior in a multi-agent domain. In: Mizoguchi, R., Slaney, J.K. (eds.) PRICAI 2000. LNCS, vol. 1886, pp. 125–135. Springer, Heidelberg (1886)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Grefenstette, J.J.: Credit assignment in rule discovery systems based on genetic algorithms. Machine Learning 3, 225–245 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Holland, J.H.: Escaping brittleness: The possibilities of general-purpose learning algorithms applied to parallel rule-based systems. In: Michalski, R.S., Carbonell, J.G., Mitchell, T.M. (eds.) Machine Learning: An Artificial Intelligence Approach, vol. 2. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Miyazaki, K., Yamamura, M., Kobayashi, S.: On the rationality of profit sharing in reinforcement learning. In: Proceedings of The 3rd International Conference on Fuzzy Logic, Neural Nets and Soft Computing, Fuzzy Logic Systems Institute, pp. 285–288 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sutton, R.S., Barto, A.G.: Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Christopher, J.C.H.: Watkins and Peter Dayan. Technical note: Q-learning. Machine Learning 8(3/4), 279–292 (1992)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Matsui, T., Inuzuka, N., Seki, H. (2003). On-line Profit Sharing Works Efficiently. In: Palade, V., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L. (eds) Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems. KES 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2773. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45224-9_45

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45224-9_45

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40803-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45224-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics