Abstract
Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) devices provide a route for nourishment to those unable to swallow. The disintegration and discoloration of a type of polyurethane PEG device was evaluated. Five ex vivo samples were obtained and, where sufficient material remained, analyzed by nano-indentation, Dynamic Mechanical Analysis (DMA) and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). The ex vivo samples showed discoloration, pitting and environmental stress cracking (ESC). A group of unused PEG devices were exposed to a gastric acid and pepsinogen formulation at 37°C for up to six weeks. An additional cohort was investigated for fungal colonization by incubating a group in Sabourard’s broth, and another group in Ensure Feed and Sabourard’s broth. Both groups were incubated with a Candida culture preparation at 37°C for up to six weeks. The samples incubated in Candida in broth only, or in Candida in feed and broth, hardened. In contrast, the samples incubated in the gastric acid formulation tended to soften. Samples that were incubated with Candida in feed and broth were discolored, more often than those exposed to Candida in broth only. Candida was shown to grow on all PEG samples exposed to it. Examination under SEM showed pit formation after exposure to Candida but no ESC was observed. In some, but not all, of the samples incubated in the gastric acid and pepsinogen formulation, ESC was seen. However, no discoloration took place in the samples incubated in the gastric acid and pepsinogen formulation. It is likely that the disintegration of the PEG devices in vivo is a multi-faceted problem, where the synergistic effects of acid, enzymes and micro-organisms all play a role in the detriment of the material.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Gauderer MWL. (2002) Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and the evolution of contemporary long-term enteral access. Clin. Nutrition 21:103–110
Sartori S, Trevisani L, Nielsen I et al. (2003) Longevity of silicone and polyurethane catheters in long-term enteral feeding via PEG. Alimentary Pharmacology Therapeutics 17:853–856
Blacka J, Donoghue J, Sutherland M et al. (2004) Dwell time and functional failure in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes: a prospective randomizeed-controlled comparison between silicon polymer and polyurethane percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes. Alimentary Pharmacol. Therapeutics 20:875–882
Van Den Hazel SJ, Mulder CJJ, Den Hartog G et al. (2000) A randomized trial of polyurethane and silicone percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy catheters. Alimentary Pharmacology Therapeutics 14:1273–1277
Gottlieb K, Iber F, Livak A et al. (1994) Oral Candida colonizes the stomach and gastrostomy feeding tubes. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 18:264–267
Lu H, Obeng Y, Richardson KA. (2002) Applicability of dynamic mechanical analysis for CMP polyurethane pad studies. Materials Characterization 49:177–186
Martin DJ, Poole Warren LA, Gunatillake PA et al. (2001) New methods for the assessment of in vitro and in vivo stress cracking in biomedical polyurethanes. Biomaterials 22:973–978
Dautle MP, Wilkinson TR, Gauderer MWL. (2003) Isolation and identification of biofilm microorganisms from silicone gastrostomy devices. J. Pediatric Surg. 38:216–220
Roorda AK, Rider DL, Rider JA et al. (2005) Do pH and temperature play a role in gastrostomy tube deterioration? J Parenter Enteral Nutr 29:388–391
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering
About this paper
Cite this paper
Joyce, T.J. (2007). Analysis of Failed Polyurethane Gastrostomy Devices and Comparison with Samples Incubated In Vitro. In: Magjarevic, R., Nagel, J.H. (eds) World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering 2006. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 14. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-36841-0_822
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-36841-0_822
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-36839-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36841-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)