Skip to main content

Implications of Minimally Invasive Surgery and CAOS to TKR Design

  • Chapter
Navigation and MIS in Orthopedic Surgery

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Archibeck MJ, Berger RA, Barden RM, Jacobs JJ, Sheinkop MB, Rosenberg AG, Galante JO (2001) Posterior cruciate ligamentretaining total knee arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg 83A(8): 1231–1236

    Google Scholar 

  2. Asano T, Akagi M, Nakamura T (2005) The functional flexion-extension axis of the knee corresponds to the surgical epicondylar axis. J Arthroplasty 20(8): 1060–1067

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Attfield SF, Wilton TJ, Pratt DJ, Sambatakakis A (1996) Soft-tissue balance and recovery of proprioception after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 78-B(4): 540–545

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Berger RA, Sanders S, Gerlinger T, DellaValle C, Jacobs JJ, Rosenberg AG (2005) Outpatient total knee arthroplasty with a minimally invasive technique. J Arthroplasty 20(7) (Suppl 3): 33–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chaudhari AM, Dyrby CO, Andriacchi TP (2005) The importance of the ACL for the function of the knee: relevance to future developments in total knee arthroplasty. In: Bellemans J, Ries MD, Victor J (eds) Total knee arthroplasty. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 121–125

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Churchill DL, Incavo SJ, Johnson CC, Beynnon BD (1998) The transepicondylar axis approximates the optimal flexion axis of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 356: 111–118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Coleman JC, Pendleton JE, Johnson TS (2006) Effect of stem geometry on fixation of cemented tibial baseplates under posterior stabilized loading conditions, vol. 31. Trans Orthopaedic Research Society, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cross MJ, Parish EN (2005) A hydroxyapatite-coated tibial total knee replacement: prospective analysis of 1000 patients. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 87-B: 1073–1076

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Mahfouz MR, Haas BD, Stiehl JB (2003) Multicenter determination of in vivo kinematics after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 418: 37–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Stiehl JB, Walker SA, Dennis KN (1998) Range of motion after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 13(7): 748–752

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fremerey RW, Lobenhoffer P, Zeichen J, Skutek M, Bosch U, Tscherne H (2000) Proprioception After rehabilitation and reconstruction in knees with deficiency of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 82-B(6): 801–806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Haider H, Walker PS (2005) Measurements of constraint of total knee replacement. J Biomech 38: 341–348

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hollister AM, Jatana S, Singh AK, Sullivan WW, Lupichuk AG (1993) The axes of rotation of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 290: 259–268

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mizner RL, Snyder-Mackler L (2005) Altered loading during walking and sit-to-stand is affected by quadriceps weakness after total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 23: 1083–1090

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nakayama K, Matsuda S, Miura H, Higaki H, Otsuka K, Iwamoto Y (2005) Contact stress at the post-cam mechanism in posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 87-B: 483–488

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Pandit H, Ward T, Hollinghurst D, Beard DJ, Gill HS, Thomas NP, Murray DW (2005) Influence of surface geometry and the campost mechanism on the kinematics of total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 87-B: 940–945

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Pritchett JW (2004) Patient preferences in knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 86-B(7): 979–982

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Silva M, Shepherd EF, Jackson WO, Pratt JA, McClung CD, Schmatzried TP (2003) Knee strength after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 18(5): 605–611

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sultan PG, Most E, Schule S, Li G, Rubash HE (2003) Optimizing flexion after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 416: 167–173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Victor J, Banks S, Bellemans J (2005) Kinematics of posterior cruciate ligament-retaining and-substituting total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 87-B: 646–655

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Walker PS (2001) A new concept in guided motion total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 16 (Suppl): 157–163

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Walker PS (2005) Bearing surfaces for motion control in total knee arthroplasty. In: Bellemans J, Ries MD, Victor J (eds) Total knee arthroplasty. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 295–302

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Walker PS, Sathasivam S (1999) The design of guide surfaces for fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing knee replacements. J Biomech 32: 27–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Walker PS, Sathasivam S (2000) Controlling the motion of total knee replacements using intercondylar guide surfaces. J Orthop Res 18(1): 48–55

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Weiss JM, Noble PC, Conditt MA, Kohl HW, Roberts S, Cook KF, Gordon MJ, Mathis KB (2002) What functional activities are important to patients with knee replacements? Clin Orthop Relat Res 404: 172–188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wolf A, Mor AB, Jaramaz B, DiGioia III AM (2004) How can CAOS support MIS TKR and THR?-Background and significance. In: Hozak WJ, Krismer M, Nogler M, Bonutti PM, Rachbauer F, Schaeffer JL, Donnelly WJ (eds) Minimally invasive total joint arthroplasty. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 182–185

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zalzal P, Papini M, Petrucelli D, deBeer J, Winemaker MJ (2004) An in vivo biomechanical analysis of the soft-tissue envelope of osteoarthritic knees. J Arthroplasty 19(2): 217–223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Medizin Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Walker, P.S., Yildirim, G., Sussman-Fort, J. (2007). Implications of Minimally Invasive Surgery and CAOS to TKR Design. In: Stiehl, J.B., Konermann, W.H., Haaker, R.G., DiGioia, A.M. (eds) Navigation and MIS in Orthopedic Surgery. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-36691-1_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-36691-1_32

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-36690-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36691-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics