Abstract
In this article we examine the role of environmental quality standards (EQS) and thresholds as a tool in environmental governance and the strive for sustainable development in Sweden. Such standards, as opposed to emission standards, are a relatively new addition to the environmental policy tools in Sweden. The role of EQS is ultimately to operationalise an approach that is described in Sweden’s National Strategy for Sustainable Development: “The society of the future must be formed within the limits set by nature, environment and human health (...)” (Gov Bill 2003/04:129) The point of departure is thus environmental quality in determining acceptability of development proposals, programmes and plans and industrial projects rather than emissions. Sweden has introduced EQS of different kinds as tools for governance and the effectiveness of different types can thus be examined. Standards, especially the National Environmental Objectives structure with its system of quantified targets is accorded a prominent role in policy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bond AJ, Wathern P (1999) Environmental assessment in the European Union. In: Petts J (ed) Handbook of Environmental Impact Assessment vol 2 Environmental Impact Assessment in practice: impact and limitations. Blackwell Science, London, pp. 223–248
Buckley R (l991) Auditing the precision and accuracy of environmental impact predictions in Australia. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 18:1–23
Dobers P (1997) Organising strategies of environmental control. Stockholm. Nerenius and Santérus
Eckerberg K, Lafferty WM (1997) Comparative perspectives on evaluation and explanation. In: Lafferty WM, Eckerberg K (eds) From earth summit to local forum. Studies of Local Agenda 21 in Europe. Oslo: ProSus, pp. 267–93
Ekmark T (2005) Miljömålens faktiska betydelse i den fysiska planeringen — exempel vägplanering. Masters thesis in spatial planning. BTH Karlskrona
Emmelin L (2007) Att förutsäga miljöpåverkan av planer och program. In: Wallentinus HG (ed) MKB Perspektiv på miljökonsekvensbeskrivning. studentlit. Lund, pp. 201–230
Emmelin L, Lerman P (2006) Styrning av markanvändning och miljö. SOU Ansvarskommitténs skriftserie. Available from http://www.sou.gov.se/ansvar/skriftserien.htm
Emmelin L (2005) “Att synas utan att verka — miljömålen som symbolpolitik?” i Lars J. Lundgren, Edman J (red.) Konflikter, samarbete, resultat. Perspektiv på svensk miljöpolitik. Festskrift till Valfrid Paulsson. Brottby: Kassandra
Emmelin L, Lerman P (2004b) Problems of a minimalist implementation — the case of Sweden. In: Schmidt M, João E, Albrecht E (eds) Implementing Strategic Environmental Assessment. Springer, Berlin
Emmelin L, Lerman P (2004a) “Miljöregler — hinder för utveckling och god miljö?” BTH Research Reports 2004:09. Available from: www.bth.se/fou
Emmelin L, Kleven T (1999) A paradigm of Environmental Bureaucracy? Attitudes, thought styles, and world views in the Norwegian environmental adminstration. NIBR’s Pluss Series 5–99
Emmelin L (1998a) Evaluating Environmental Impact Assessment Systems — Part 1: Theoretical and Methodological Considerations. Scandinavian housing and planning research 15(129):148
Emmelin L (1998b) Evaluating Environmental Impact Assessment — Part 2: Professional Culture as an Aid in Understanding Implementation. Scandinavian housing and planning research 15:187–209
Emmelin L (1996) Landscape Impact Analysis: a systematic approach to landscape impacts of policy. Landscape Research, vol 21, no 1 1996
Emmelin L (1983) Planering med ekologisk grundsyn. Naturresurs och miljökommittén. Bakgrundsmaterial n 13
Gipperth L, Michanek G (2000) Utveckling av miljökvalitetsnormer som rättsligt instrument. Naturvårdsverket Rapport 5138
Government Bill 2004/05:129 p. 53
Government Bill 1997/98:45 part 2 p. 278
Government Bill 1990/91:90 p. 172
Government Paper 2003/04:129 A Swedish Strategy for Sustainable Development
Hajer MA (1995) The politics of Environmental Discourse. Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. Oxford University Press
Harrison NE (2000) Constructing Sustainable Development State University of New York
Heberlein T (1973) Social psychological assumptions of user attitude surveys: The case of the wildernism scale. Journal of Leisure Research, 5:18–33
Jansen A-I, Osland O, Hanf K (1998) Environmental challenges and institutional changes. An interpretation of the development of environmental policy in Western Europe’, In: Hanf K, Jansen A-I (eds) Governance and Environmental Quality. Environmental administration, policy and politics in Western Europe. London: Longman pp. 277–325
Lerman P (2004) Miljökvalitetsnormer som styrmedel Uppföljning och utvärdering av tillämpningen av miljökvalitetsnormer för luftkvalitet under perioden 1999–2003 Rap. 5375
Lundqvist L-J (2004) Sweden and ecological governance. Manchester University Press
Munn R E (1979) Environmental impact analysis. Principles and procedures. 2 ed SCOPE Report no 5. Toronto: Wiley
Oscarsson A (2006) Lack of incitement in the Swedish EIA/SEA process to include cumulative effects. In: Emmelin L (ed) (2006) Effective tools for environmental assessment — critical reflections on concepts and practice. BTH research Report 2006:3, p. 92–115.
Riksrevisionen (2005) Miljömålsrapporteringen — för mycket och för lite. RiR 2005:1
Sager T (1990) Communicate or Calculate: Planning Theory and Social Science Concepts in a Contingency Perspective. Nordplan Dissertation
Sager T (1994) Communicative Planning Theory. Avebury
Stankey GH, McCool SF, Clark RN, Brown PJ (1999) Institutional and Organisational Challenges to Managing Natural Resources for Recreation: A Social Learning Model. In: Jackson EL, Burton TL (1999) Leisure Studies. Prospects for the Twenty-first Century. College State, Pennsylvania, Venture Publishing
Wood C (2003) Environmental Impact Assessment: A Comparative Review. 2nd edn, Prentice Hall
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Emmelin, L., Lerman, P. (2008). Environmental Quality Standards as a Tool in Environmental Governance — the Case of Sweden. In: Schmidt, M., Glasson, J., Emmelin, L., Helbron, H. (eds) Standards and Thresholds for Impact Assessment. Environmental Protection in the European Union, vol 3. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-31141-6_36
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-31141-6_36
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-31140-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31141-6
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)