Skip to main content

Abstract

The class of visibly pushdown languages has been recently defined as a subclass of context-free languages with desirable closure properties and tractable decision problems. We study visibly pushdown games, which are games played on visibly pushdown systems where the winning condition is given by a visibly pushdown language. We establish that, unlike pushdown games with pushdown winning conditions, visibly pushdown games are decidable and are 2Exptime-complete. We also show that pushdown games against Ltl specifications and Caret specifications are 3Exptime-complete. Finally, we establish the topological complexity of visibly pushdown languages by showing that they are a subclass of Boolean combinations of Σ 3 sets. This leads to an alternative proof that visibly pushdown automata are not determinizable and also shows that visibly pushdown games are determined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alur, R., Etessami, K., Madhusudan, P.: A temporal logic of nested calls and returns. In: Jensen, K., Podelski, A. (eds.) TACAS 2004. LNCS, vol. 2988, pp. 467–481. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Alur, R., Madhusudan, P.: Visibly pushdown languages. In: Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 2004 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ball, T., Rajamani, S.: Bebop: A symbolic model checker for boolean programs. In: Havelund, K., Penix, J., Visser, W. (eds.) SPIN 2000. LNCS, vol. 1885, pp. 113–130. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Bouquet, A., Serre, O., Walukiewicz, I.: Pushdown games with unboundedness and regular conditions. In: Pandya, P.K., Radhakrishnan, J. (eds.) FSTTCS 2003. LNCS, vol. 2914, pp. 88–99. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Cachat, T., Duparc, J., Thomas, W.: Solving pushdown games with a Σ3 winning condition. In: Bradfield, J.C. (ed.) CSL 2002 and EACSL 2002. LNCS, vol. 2471, pp. 322–336. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Emerson, E.A., Jutla, C.S., Sistla, A.P.: On model-checking for fragments of μ-calculus. In: CAV 1993. LNCS, vol. 697, pp. 385–396. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kechris, A.S.: Classical Descriptive Set Theory. Graduate texts in mathematics, vol. 156. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Martin, D.A.: Borel Determinacy. Annals of Mathematics 102, 363–371 (1975)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Pnueli, A., Rosner, R.: On the synthesis of a reactive module. In: Proc. 16th ACM Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, Austin (January 1989)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Reps, T., Horwitz, S., Sagiv, S.: Precise interprocedural dataflow analysis via graph reachability. In: Proc. of ACM Symp. POPL, pp. 49–61 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Serre, O.: Games with winning conditions of high borel complexity. In: Díaz, J., Karhumäki, J., Lepistö, A., Sannella, D. (eds.) ICALP 2004. LNCS, vol. 3142, pp. 1150–1162. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Staiger, L.: ω-Languages. In: Handbook of Formal Language Theory, vol. III, Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Thomas, W.: Languages, Automata, and Logic. In: Handbook of Formal Language Theory, vol. III, pp. 389–455. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Thomas, W.: A short introduction to infinite automata. In: Kuich, W., Rozenberg, G., Salomaa, A. (eds.) DLT 2001. LNCS, vol. 2295, pp. 130–144. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Walukiewicz, I.: Pushdown processes: Games and model checking. Information and Computation 164(2) (January 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Walukiewicz, I.: A landscape with games in the background. To appear in Proceedings of LICS 2004 (2004) (Invited talk)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zielonka, W.: Infinite games on finitely coloured graphs with applications to automata on infinite trees. TCS 200(1-2), 135–183 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Löding, C., Madhusudan, P., Serre, O. (2004). Visibly Pushdown Games. In: Lodaya, K., Mahajan, M. (eds) FSTTCS 2004: Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science. FSTTCS 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3328. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30538-5_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30538-5_34

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-24058-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30538-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics