Skip to main content

Evolution and the Scala Naturae

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Neuroscience

Synonyms

Scale of nature; Phylogenetic scale; Evolutionary scale

Definition

A hierarchical ranking of animals based on Aristotelian notions of perfection, with humans at the top. It has often been used incorrectly as a model for vertebrate evolution.

Characteristics

In seeking to find order and relationship in the biological world, the Greek scientist and philosopher, Aristotle (384–322 B.C.) devised a classification scheme for animals that came to be known as the scala naturae in its Latin translation from Greek. In Latin, scala means “ladder” or “flight of steps” and naturae means “of nature” or “of the universe”. Aristotle’s idea was that living things could be assigned a hierarchical position on this metaphorical ladder that would represent their degree of perfection [1,2,3]. He placed humans on the top rung and other creatures of the known world on progressively lower rungs. He based his classification system on various biological characteristics that he could observe, such as...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Aristotle (1910) Historia Animalium. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK (Translated by W Ogle)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Aristotle (1912) De Partibus Animalium. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK (Translated by W Ogle)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Aristotle (1912) De Generatione Animalium. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK (Translated by A Platt)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hodos W, Campbell CBG (1969) Scala naturae: why there is no theory in comparative psychology. Psych Rev 76:337–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lovejoy AO (1936) The great chain of being. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hodos W, Campbell CBG (1990) Evolutionary scales and comparative studies of cognition. In: Kesner R, Olton D (eds) Animal cognition. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 1–21

    Google Scholar 

  7. Butler AB, Hodos W (2005) Comparative vertebrate neuroanatomy: evolution and adaptation, 2nd edn. Wiley-Liss, Hoboken, NJ

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Hofman MA (2001) Evolution and complexity of the human brain: some organizing principles. In: RothG, Wullimann ME (eds) Brain evolution and cognition. Wiley, New York, pp 501–521

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jerison HJ (2001) The evolution of neural complexity. In: Roth G, Wullimann ME (eds) Brain evolution and cognition. Wiley, New York, pp 521–553

    Google Scholar 

  10. Carroll RL (1988) Vertebrate paleontology and evolution. Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ayala EJ (1988) Can “progress” be defined as a biological concept? In: Nitecki MH (ed) Evolutionary progress. University of Chicago Press, Chicago Press, IL, pp 75–96

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gould SJ (1988) On replacing the idea of progress with an operational notion of directionality. In: Nitecki MH (ed) Evolutionary progress. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp 319–338

    Google Scholar 

  13. Campbell CBG, Hodos W (1991) The scala naturae revisited: anagenesis and evolutionary scales in comparative psychology. J Comp Psych 105:211–221

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag GmbH Berlin Heidelberg

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Hodos, W. (2009). Evolution and the Scala Naturae. In: Binder, M.D., Hirokawa, N., Windhorst, U. (eds) Encyclopedia of Neuroscience. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-29678-2_3118

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics