Abstract
Although numerous attempts have been made to date to rise to the challenge of overcoming the crisis of sustainability (Orr, 1992), we are still grappling with this complex and demanding task. Therefore, it becomes acutely necessary to review best current initiatives of implementing sustainability oriented educational endeavours, not least in the context of higher education, in order to shed some light on the specifics of approaches and pathways pursued by separate individuals or groups, which might serve to inform practices in similar contexts. Recent reports indicate that the need to encourage the discussion and dissemination of good practices in the European Higher Education Area is recognised on the level of the European Commission (Tauch, 2011). We believe these discussions should be placed in the broader context within which higher education institutions of today are functioning.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Banning, J. (n.d.) Ecological triangulation: An approach for qualitative meta-synthesis. Available on: http://mycahs.colostate.edu/James.H.Banning/PDFs/Ecological%20Triangualtion.pdf (2011-05-23)
Belousa, I. (2002). Sustainable education and spirituality in the university: Looking for a way of complementation. Journal of Teacher Education and Training, 1, 3–12.
Berry, T. (2009). The sacred universe: Earth, spirituality and religion in the 21st century. New York, Chicester, West Sussex: Colombia University Press.
Berry, T. (2006). Foreword. In A. J. LaChance, Cultural addiction: The greenspirit guide to recovery (pp. vii–xvi). Berkley, CA: North Atlantic Books.
Birmingham, C. (2004). Phronesis: A Model for Pedagogical Reflection. Journal of Teacher Education, 55(4), 313–324.
Bradbury Huang, H. (2010). What is good action research? : Why the resurgent interest? Action Research, 8(1), 93–109.
Bradbury, H., & Reason, P. (2003). Action Research: An Opportunity for Revitalizing Research Purpose and Practices. Qualitative Social Work, 2(2), 155–175.
Bricker, D. (2000). Inclusion: How the Scene Has Changed. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 20(1), 14–19.
Buchan, J., & Griffin, J. (2010). Finding a place for environmental studies: Tertiary institutions as a locus of practice for education for sustainability. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 12(2), 5–16.
Carr, D. (2007). Character in teaching. British Journal of Educational Studies, 55(4), 369–389.
Cassell, C., & Johnson, P. (2006). Action research: Explaining the diversity. Human Relations, 59(6), 783–814.
Coleman, L., J. & Olthouse, J. (2007) Inclusion. In Encyclopedia of Giftedness, Creativity, and Talent. SAGE Publications. Available on: http://sage-ereference.com/giftedness/Article_n198.html (2009-09-19)
Conner, L. N. & Greene, W. L. (2006). General scope and purpose. In A. Pipere (Ed.), Education & Sustainable Development: First Steps Toward Changes”, 1 (pp. 319–323). Daugavpils: Daugavpils University Publishing House “Saule”.
Gadotti, M. (2010). Reorienting education practices towards sustainability. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 4(2), 203–211.
Gayá Wicks, P., & Reason, P. (2009). Initiating action research: Challenges and paradoxes of opening communicative space. Action Research, 7(3), 243–262.
Gedžūne, G., & Gedžūne, I. (2010a). Social exclusion in education: Pre-service teachers’ perspective. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 12(1), 85–98.
Gedžūne, I., & Gedžūne, G. (2010b). Features of inclusion in education: Tendencies in contemporary research and pre-service teachers’ views. In Dimenzie občianstva a výchova / Dimensions of Citizenship and Education. Proceedings of the 8th International conference for civic education, 10–12 February 2010 (pp. 288–304). Bratislava, Slovakia: KEVON.
Gedžūne, I., & Gedžūne, G. (2011a). Exploring and promoting ecological consciousness in teacher education: The possibilities of educational action research in education for sustainable development. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 13(1), 43–61.
Gedžūne, I., & Gedžūne, G. (2011b). Educational action research for exploring pre-service teachers’ understanding of ecological attitude. In Proceedings of international conference The Future of Education, 16–17 June 2011 (pp. 266–270). Florence, Italy: Simonelli Editore University Press.
Gedžūne, G., Gedžūne, I., Salīte, I., & Iliško, Dz. (2011). Exploring pre-service teachers’ frames of reference and their orientation towards inclusion or exclusion: Educational action research journey. In Proceedings of the 9th JTEFS/BBCC conference “Sustainable Development. Culture. Education: BBCC Mission: BBCC Mission – Reorientation of Teacher Education and Research in Education for Sustainable Development”, 18–21 May 2011, CD (pp. 80–102). Siauliai, Lithuania: Vš Šiauli universiteto leidykla.
Gedžūne, I., Gedžūne, G., Skrinda, A., & Mičule, I. (2011). Educational action research to generate ecological wisdom of insight for inclusion and sustainability. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 2(1), 5–11.
Gibbs, P., Costley, C., Armsby, P., & Trakakis, A. (2007). Developing the ethics of worker-researchers through phronesis. Teaching in Higher Education, 12(3), 365–375.
Gibbs, P. & Angelides, P. (2004). Accreditation of knowledge as being-in-the-world. Journal of Education and Work, 17(3), 333–346.
Grabovska, R., & Grabowski, J. (2009). Implementing the United Nations Decade on Education for Sustainable Development in Latvian higher education. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 11(1), 18–30.
Gravett, S. (2004). Action Research and Transformative Learning in Teacher Development. Educational Action Research, 12(2), 259–272.
Iliško, Dz., Ignatjeva S., & Mičule, I. (2010). Teachers as researchers: Bringing teachers’ voice to the educational landscape. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 12(1), 85–98.
Jensen, D. (2008). How shall I live my life?: On liberating the Earth from civilization. USA: PM Press.
Kelly, P. (2006). Learning for sustainable futures: One intervention. Journal of Future Studies, 10(3), 1–14.
King, U. (2010). Earthling spiritual literacy: How to link spiritual development and education to a new Earth consciousness. Journal of Beliefs and Values, 31(3), 245–260.
Leal Filho, W. (2011). Some developments of education for sustainable development in higher education institutions. In Proceedings of the 9th JTEFS/BBCC conference “Sustainable Development. Culture. Education: BBCC Mission: BBCC Mission – Reorientation of Teacher Education and Research in Education for Sustainable Development”, 18–21 May 2011, CD (pp. 171–196). Siauliai, Lithuania: Vš Šiauli universiteto leidykla.
Leitch, R., & Day, C. (2000). Action research and reflective practice: Towards a holistic view. Educational Action Research, 8(1), 179–193.
McCormick, J., Rodney, P., & Varcoe, C. (2003). Reinterpretations across studies: An approach to meta-analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 13(7), 933–944.
Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning to think like and adult: Core concepts of transformation theory. In J. Mezirow & Associates (Eds.), Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress (pp. 3–34). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Moore, J. (2005). Is higher education ready for transformative learning? A question explored in the study of sustainability. Journal of Transformative Education, 3(1), 76–91.
Mosquin, T., & Rowe, S. (2004). A manifesto for Earth. Biodiversity, 5(1), 3–9.
Naess, A. (1989). Ecology, community and lifestyle. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Orr, D. W. (1992). Ecological literacy: Education and the transition to a postmodern world. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
O’Sullivan, E. (1999). Transformative learning: Educational vision for the 21st century. London, New York: Zed Books.
Pipere, A., & Salite, I. (2006). Educational action research in teacher education: Fostering research skills. In Proceedings of Asia-Pacific Educational Research Association International Conference Educational Research, Policy and Practice in an Era of Globalization, 28–30 November 2006 (CD, Q61, 15 pages). Hong-Kong: Hong Kong Institute of Education.
Pooley, J. A., & O’Connor, M. (2000). Environmental education and attitudes: Emotions and beliefs are what is needed. Environment and Behaviour, 32(5), 711–723.
Reason, P. (1999). Integrating action and reflection through co-operative inquiry. Management Learning, 30(2), 207–226.
Reason, P. (2003). Pragmatist philosophy and action research: Readings and conversation with Richard Rorty. Action Research, 1(1), 103–123.
Roca, E. (2007). Intuitive practical wisdom in organizational life. Social Epistemology, 21(2), 195–207.
Rohweder, L., & Virtanen, A.(2009). Developing the model on the learning for sustainable development in higher education. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 11(1), 31–42.
Ryland, E. (2000). Gaia rising: A Jungian look at environmental consciousness and sustainable organizations. Organization & Environment, 13(4), 381–402.
Salīte, I. (2002). Teachers’ views on the aim of education for sustainable development. Journal of Teacher Education and Training, 1, 68–80.
Salīte, I. (2006). Aim of education in the context of present and future educational issues: Perspective of teachers. In A. Pipere (Ed.), Education & Sustainable Development: First Steps Toward Changes”, 1 (pp. 390–407). Daugavpils: Daugavpils University Publishing House “Saule”.
Salīte, I. (2008). Educational action research for sustainability: Constructing a vision for the future in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 10, 5–16.
Salīte, I., & Klepere, R. (2003). Biotism as a ground for the education of reflection in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education and Training, 3, 44–58.
Salīte, I., & Pipere, A. (2006). Aspects of sustainable development from the perspective of teachers. Journal of Teacher Education and Training, 6, 15–32.
Salīte, I., Gedžūne, G., & Gedžūne, I. (2009). Educational action research for sustainability: Seeking wisdom of insight in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 11(2), 14–30.
Salīte, I., Gedžūne, I., & Gedžūne, G. (2010). From personally relevant experience to action research for sustainable education. In M. Witthaus, K. McCandless, & R. Lambert (Eds.), Tomorrow Today (pp. 95–98). Leicester: Tudor Rose, UNESCO.
Salīte, I. Mičule, I. Kravale, M. Iliško, Dz. & Stakle, A. (2007). Toward sustainability in teacher education: Promise of action research. In A. Pipere (Ed.), Education & Sustainable Development: First Steps Toward Changes”, 2 (pp. 263–292). Daugavpils: Daugavpils University Academic Press “Saule”.
Saugstad, T. (2002). Educational theory and practice in an Aristotelian perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 46(4), 373–390.
Silverman, J., C. (2007). Epistemological beliefs and attitudes toward inclusion in pre-service teachers. Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 30(1), 42–51.
Stakle, A. (2006). Attitude towards teaching and learning in the context of students’ educational philosophy. In A. Pipere (Ed.), Education & Sustainable Development: First Steps Toward Changes”, 1 (pp. 368–380). Daugavpils: Daugavpils University Publishing House “Saule”.
Tauch, C. (2011). EU Higher Education Issues and Priorities for 2010 – 2020. Journal of the European Higher Education Area, 2, 65–60.
UNESCO (2005). Guidelines and Recommendations for Reorienting Teacher Education to Address Sustainability. Available on: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001433/1433 70e.pdf (2011-05-25)
Vandenkendelaere, B. (2011). A definition of excellence: Opportunity for a pit stop? Journal of the European Higher Education Area, 2, 49–64.
Watson, J. (2007). Spiritual development: Constructing an inclusive and progressive approach. Journal of Beliefs and Values, 28(2), 125–136.
Yorks, L., & Kasl, E. (2006). I know more than I can say: A taxonomy for using expressive ways of knowing to foster transformative learning. Journal of Transformative Education, 4(1), 43–64.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix 1
Appendix 1
Research and learning environment for sustainability oriented teacher education as depicted in the publications of the Faculty’s staff: a summary
Authors of the study | Topic | Theoretical underpinnings | Methodological peculiarities | Participants | Major findings and conclusions | Emergent feature of research and learning environment for sustainability oriented teacher education |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Salīte (2002) | Approaches to defining the aims and principles of ESD | Thomas Berry’s insights concerning anthropocentrism and ecocentrism | Qualitative analysis of data from cooperative assignments performed by 49 groups in the study course Environmental Pedagogy | 259 in-service and pre-service teachers enrolled in preschool and primary school teacher training programmes at Daugavpils University (DU) | Teachers use ecocentrism as a background for defining the aim of education if the aim is comprehended in the context of person’s or humanity’s spiritual development Educational interests which extend beyond those of a human being as a species are grounded in the joining of anthropocentrism and ecocentrism Teachers’ interpretations of ESD are grounded in different combinations of antrhropocentrism and ecocentrism | Cooperative exploration of anthropocentric and ecocentric underpinnings of the aims of ESD |
Salīte (2006) | Aims and features of education important for the future | Future oriented behaviour, which is grounded in hope, as an inherently human trait acquired in the course of evolution | Quantitative and qualitative analysis of data from teachers’ involvement in reflective and constructive activities individually and in small groups or pairs | 38 in-service teachers undertaking master studies in pedagogy at DU | Teachers believe education should nurture values, promote development of learners’ personality and guide them towards assuming sustainability oriented attitudes | Reflexive insights into the spiritual dimension of education through focusing on the aims of sustainability oriented education for the present and for the future |
Salīte and Pipere (2006) | Interrelations between aspects or dimensions of SD from the perspective of in-service teachers | Venn’s diagram framework capturing the essence of SD | Building on life experiences to seek associations on maintenance and development of sustainability Dialogical evaluation of the identified items Use of Venn’s diagram to select features typical for single and integrated aspects of sustainability Qualitative and quantitative data analysis | 144 in-service preschool and primary school teachers undertaking their higher professional studies at DU | In teachers’ conception of sustainable development, human primary survival needs and lifeworld needs are unbalanced with sustainability oriented activities and individual attitudes - teachers are more preoccupied with their survival needs rather than sustainability related activities and attitudes Need to improve teachers’ quality of life so as to direct their energies in the vein of enhancing sustainability in education | Teachers’ experience-based reflection and critical discourse on the multi-dimensional concept of sustainable development |
Salīte (2008) | Sustainable future of Latvia as perceived by pre-service teachers | 4-dimensional (environment-tal, social, economical, cultural) frame of reference for viewing sustainability | Reflective construction of vision for a sustainable future of the country | 114 first-year students enrolled in preschool and primary school teacher education programmes at DU | Pre-service teachers’ future visions exhibit hopes for transformation of social and cultural relationships Pre-service teachers set immediate objectives for reorientation of education at all levels towards sustainability | ctive construction of Refle a vision for a sustainable future on the grounds of a four dimensional frame of reference for viewing sustainability |
Salīte and Klepere (2003) | Biotism as a ground for enhancing reflection and reorientation of teacher’s professional thinking towards ESD | Concept of biotic attitude which is perceived as caring interaction between different systems Mezirow’s insights about frames of reference | Critical and constructive learning from each other, reflection on and critical evaluation of experiences, to define the aims of teacher’s professional activity (constructing graphic attitude profiles, their transformation into verbal form and critical evaluation on the grounds of individual and professional experience) | In-service teachers undertaking their higher professional studies at DU | Biotism and abiotism emerge as multicoloured nuances that characterise teacher’s frames of reference Teacher’s propositions for the aims of ESD underscore recognition and promotion of feelings, empathy and biotic attitude | Critical reflection on biotic and abiotic attitudes in teachers’ frames of reference |
Salīte, Mičule, Kravale, Iliško and Stakle (2007) | Sustainability in teacher education | Mezirow’s transformative learning theory and insights about frames of reference | Reflective activities where students (1) identify the contents of sustainability/ unsustainability and evaluate environmental, social and economic issues, (2) write essays about the issues of sustainability, (3) model the contents of sustainability in group discussions | Researchers from the Faculty Students who acquired or had previously acquired study courses Environmental Pedagogy and Education for Sustainable Development | Action research into sustainability related issues, embedded into the process of study course acquisition, can be used as environment for the development of students’ research skills (a) by creating a space where future teachers can reflect on their experiences and identify their individual frames of reference in research activity, (b) by encouraging the reorientation of these frames of reference towards sustainability, and (c) by providing opportunities for students to articulate their views on sustainability related issues. | Creating spaces for students to explore their individual frames of reference through reflection on lived experiences and seeking personal meaning in sustainability related concepts |
Gedžūne, Gedžūne, Salīte and Iliško (2011) | Pre-service teachers’ frames of reference for practising various ways of interaction with nature | Mezirow’s concept of a frame of reference Metaphorical conception of educational action research as a learning journey | Qualitative and quantitative analysis of data from cooperative inquiry into students’ experiences of using various ways of interaction with nature to uncover future teachers’ underlying frames of reference | 36 first-year students of pre-school and primary school teacher education programmes implemented at the Faculty | Becoming aware of one’s assumptions and underlying frames of reference through educational action research is the first step towards transforming pre-service teachers’ personal and professional frames of reference towards inclusion in the broader community of life on Earth. The latter, in time, will enable future teachers to help their pupils become responsible members of an inclusive and sustainable world | Educational action research journey for exploration of pre-service teachers’ frames of reference and their orientation to inclusion or exclusion |
Gedžūne and Gedžūne (2011a) | Pre-service teachers’ frames of reference for understanding ecological consciousness | Works of deep ecologists and insights derived from Dewey’s philosophy by proponents anthropological theory | Qualitative content analysis of student’s critical reflections on the concept of ecological consciousness in relation to the issues enclosed in the document “A manifesto for Earth” | 39 first-year students of pre-school and primary school teacher education programmes implemented at the Faculty | Conceptual framework of 3 frames of reference that pre-service teachers use for expressing their views on the issue of ecological consciousness and the ideas imbedded in the Manifesto: (1) inclusion-oriented frame of reference (2) exclusion-determining frame of reference (3) solution-oriented frame of reference Teacher education should assist students in reflecting about their ecological consciousness and thus lead to exploration and, ultimately, transformation of their frames of reference towards inclusion since teachers are major agents of change in implementing education for a more sustainable, inclusive and ecocentric world | Exploration and development of pre-service teachers’ ecological consciousness for transforming their frames of reference towards inclusion |
Gedžūne and Gedžūne (2011b) | Pre-service teachers’ perspectives on the content of ecological attitude and frames of reference for viewing this phenomenon | Mezirow’s transformative learning theory and concept of a frame of reference | Qualitative content analysis of student’s critical experience-based reflections on the concept of ecological attitude in pairs or small groups | 37 first-year students of pre-school and primary school teacher education programmes implemented at the Faculty | Pre-service teachers use complex frames of reference with behavioural, cognitive, axiological and affective dimensions to view ecological attitude, though the behavioural and axiological dimensions are found to be more pronounced than others Teacher education should specifically target affective and cognitive dimensions of students’ frames of reference, focusing on beliefs and emotions embedded in their experience, to foster a more holistic ecological attitude | Critical reflection on lived experience to uncover pre-service teachers’ frames of reference for understanding ecological attitude |
Salīte, Gedžūne and Gedžūne (2009) | Humans’ attitude towards own and other species from the perspective of | Concepts of inclusion and exclusion as characteristics of relationships between person and environment Aristotelian concept of phronesis | Reflective evaluation of experiences regarding attitude towards own and other species (a) study of the content of experiences and its description in 1 word and 1 sentence, (b) evaluation of identified experiences in the context of inclusion and exclusion oriented frames of reference, (c) dialogue among researchers and participants to seek phronesis in the context of learning | 38 first-year students enrolled in pre-school and primary school teacher education programmes at DU | Pre-service teachers perceive relationships among humans, as well as between humans and other species as mainly being exclusion oriented Conscious efforts to open communicative space at the initial stage of research permit to successfully engage participants in reflection on their experiences and seeking the seeds of phronetic wisdom for sustainability therein | Phronetically oriented educational action research with a focus on humans’ attitudes towards own and other species as a space for seeking wisdom of insight for sustainability |
Gedžūne, Gedžūne, Skrinda and Mičule (2011) | Pre-service teachers’ views on ecological identity | Insights derived from Mezirow’s transformative learning theory | Gradual opening of communicative space to engage pre-service teachers in creation of reflective discourse of their experiences of interaction with the social and natural world to reveal the features of individual and collective ecological identity most characteristic of the students and their community | 31 first-year students enrolled in pre-school and primary school teacher education programmes at DU | Ecological identity as perceived by the research participants has four dimensions (cognitive, affective, axiological and conative) and an orientation towards inclusion or apprehended belonging to the life community and its support system Participation in educational action research involves future teachers in generating ecological wisdom of insight for sustainability - a wisdom that they need in order to help their pupils become responsible members of the community of life and actors of change for a sustainable future | Opening of communicative space to enhance creation of critical discourse on ecological identity as a means to encourage seeking wisdom of insight for inclusion and sustainability |
Gedžūne and Gedžūne (2010a) | Pre-service teachers’ perspectives on social exclusion in the context of educational unsustainability | Explanations of the phenomenon of social exclusion advanced by various scholars | Thematic workshops in the study course Education for Sustainable Development where students (1) explore the broader context of the problem (2) evaluate personal experiences of social exclusion in educational settings (3) formulate a generalised explanation of the phenomenon and (4) seek problem solutions in the form of personal guidelines for their future pedagogic work | 25 first-year students enrolled in pre-school and primary school teacher education programmes at DU | It is important to address the issue of social exclusion in teacher education programmes at university level because of the key role that teachers play in reducing social exclusion in educational contexts by operating on the grounds of an inclusive values orientation | Reflexive exploration of social exclusion as manifestation of unsustainability in educational setting |
Gedžūne and Gedžūne (2010b) | Features of inclusion in educational context | Dewey’s views on experience and its relation to humaneness Holistic perspective which entails awareness of deep connections with natural and social worlds | Qualitative content analysis of students’ experience-based individual and group reflections on the issue of inclusion within a semester-long educational action research conducted while implementing the study course Environmental Pedagogy | 38 first-year students of pre-school and primary school teacher education programmes implemented at the Faculty | Diversity, meaningful and willing participation, mutual interconnectedness and a sense of belonging are the main features of inclusion which, in theoretical literature, are chiefly explored in the social context while research participants tend to supplement the latter with a broader ecological context | Experience and reflection based sense-making of the concept of inclusion perceived as a precondition for sustainable development of the planet |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gedžūne, G., Gedžūne, I. (2013). Action Research for Education for Sustainable Development in Teacher Education: Research and Learning Environment at Daugavpils University. In: Brunold, A., Ohlmeier, B. (eds) School and Community Interactions. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-19477-6_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-19477-6_8
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-531-19476-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-531-19477-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)