Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Attentionale Horizonte zwischen Phänomenologie und Psychologie

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Aufmerksamkeit

  • 9973 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Die psychologische wie auch die philosophische Untersuchung der Aufmerksamkeit nimmt ihren Ausgang von der Problematisierung des Umstands, dass wir uns nicht allen wahrnehmbaren Dingen gleichermaßen bzw. mit der gleichen Bewusstseinsqualität zuwenden können. Insofern muss eine nach bestimmten Kriterien verlaufende Auswahl stattfinden. Die psychologische Aufmerksamkeitsforschung fasst diese Tendenz mit dem Konzept der Selektion, das eng mit der Annahme zusammenhängt, dass die menschliche Informationsverarbeitung beschränkt ist. Der angenommene Selektionsmechanismus filtert diejenigen Reize, Orte oder Gegenstände heraus, die nicht eingehender verarbeitet werden sollen, denen somit also keine Aufmerksamkeit zuteil wird.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Allport, D. A. (1987). Selection for action: some behavioral and neurophysiological considerations of attention. In H. Heuer, & A. F. Sanders (Hrsg.), Perspectives on perception and action (S. 395–419). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allport, D. A. (1989). Visual attention. In M. I. Posner (Hrsg.), Foundations of cognitive science (S. 631–682). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arvidson, P. S. (2008). Attentional capture and attentional character. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 7, 539–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arvidson, P. S. (2010). Attention in context. In: S. Gallagher, & D. Schmicking (Hrsg.), Handbook of phenomenology and cognitive science (S. 99–123). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balas, B., & Sinha, P. (2007). Filling in colour in natural scenes. Visual Cognition 15, 765–778.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biederman, I., Rabinowitz, J. C., Glass, A. L., & Stacy, E. W. (1974). On the information extracted from a glance at a scene. Journal of Experimental Psychology 103, 597–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biederman, I., Mezzanotte, R. J., & Rabinowitz, J. C. (1982). Scene perception: detecting and judging objects undergoing relational violations. Cognitive Psychology 14, 143–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent, D. E. (1971). Decision and stress. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breyer, T. (2011). Attentionalität und Intentionalität. Grundzüge einer phänomenologischkognitionswissenschaftlichen Theorie der Aufmerksamkeit. Paderborn: Wilhelm Fink.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buonomano, D. V., & Merzenich, M. M. (1998). Cortical plasticity: from synapses to maps. Annual Review of Neuroscience 21, 149–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvo-Merino, B., Grézes, J., Glaser, D. E., Passingham, R. E., & Haggard, P. (2006). Seeing or doing? Influence of visual and motor familiarity in action observation. Current Biology 16, 1905–1910.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvo-Merino, B., Ehrenberg, S., Leung, D., & Haggard, P. (2010). Experts see it all: configural effects in action observation. Psychological Research 74, 400–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherry, E. C. (1953). Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 25, 975–979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chun, M. M. (2000). Contextual cueing of visual attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4, 170–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chun, M. M. (2003). Scene perception and memory. In D. Irwin & B. Ross (Hrsg.), Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory (S. 79–108). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, R. J., & Lutz, A. (2007). Buddha’s brain: neuroplasticity and meditation. IEEE Signal Processing 176, 172–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Draganski, B., Gaser, C., Kempermann, G., Kuhn, H. G., Winkler, J., Büchel, C., & May, A. (2006). Temporal and spatial dynamics of brain structure changes during extensive learning. Journal of Neuroscience 27, 6314–6317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ennen, E. (2003). Phenomenological coping skills and the striatal memory system. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 2, 299–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enns, J. T., & Lleras, A. (2008). What’s next? New evidence for prediction in human vision. Trends in Cognitive Science 12, 327–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franck, G. (1998). Ökonomie der Aufmerksamkeit. München, Wien: Hanser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, S. (2005). How the body shapes the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, S., & Zahavi, D. (2008). The phenomenological mind. London, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, M. R., & Oliva, A. (2009). Recognition of natural scenes from global properties: seeing the forest without representing the trees. Cognitive Psychology 58/2, 137–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurwitsch, A. (1929). Phänomenologie der Thematik und des reinen Ich. Psychologische Forschungen 12, 279–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heijden, A. H. C. van der (1992). Selective attention in vision. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, J. M. (2003). Human gaze control during real-world scene perception. Trends in Cognitive Science 7, 498–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. (1952). Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Zweites Buch. Phänomenologische Untersuchungen zur Konstitution. Husserliana IV. Den Haag: Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. (1966a). Zur Phänomenologie des inneren Zeitbewusstseins. Husserliana X. Den Haag: Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. (1966b). Analysen zur passiven Synthesis. Husserliana XI. Den Haag: Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. (2001). Die Bernauer Manuskripte über das Zeitbewusstsein (1917/18). Husserliana XXXIII. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iordanescu, L., Guzman, E., Grabowecky, M., & Suzuki, S. (2008). Characteristic sounds facilitate visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin Review 15, 548–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loftus, G. R., & Mackworth, N. H. (1978). Cognitive determinants of fixation location during picture viewing. Journal of Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 4, 565–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackworth, N. H., & Morandi, A. J. (1967). The gaze selects informative details within pictures. Perception and Psychophysics 2, 547–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1966). Phänomenologie der Wahrnehmung. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1976). Die Struktur des Verhaltens. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mole, C. (2009). Attention. In J. Symons, & P. Calvo (Hrsg.), The Routledge companion to philosophy of psychology (S. 495–509). London, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Most, S. B., Scholl, B. J., Clifford, E. R., & Simons, D. J. (2005). What you see is what you set: sustained inattentional blindness and the capture of awareness. Psychological Review 112, 217–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Most, S. B., & Astur, R. S. (2007). Feature-based attentional set as a cause of traffic accidents. Visual Cognition 15, 125–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, O. (1987). Beyond capacity: a functional view of attention. In H. Heuer, & A. F. Sanders (Hrsg.), Perspectives on perception and action (S. 361–399). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, O. (1990). Visual attention and action. In O. Neumann, & W. Prinz (Hrsg.), Relationships between perception and action (S. 227–264). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, O. (1996). Theorien der Aufmerksamkeit. In O. Neumann, & A. F. Sanders (Hrsg.), Aufmerksamkeit. Göttingen, Bern, Toronto, Seattle: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noë, A. (2004). Action in perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Reagan, J. K., & Noë, A. (2001). A sensorimotor approach to vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24, 939–1031.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliva, A., & Torralba, A. (2006). Building the gist of a scene: the role of global image features in recognition. Progress in Brain Research: Visual Perception 155, 23–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, S. E. (1975). The effects of contextual scenes on the identification of objects. Memory and Cognition 3, 519–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pashler, H. E. (1998). The psychology of attention. Hove: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieger, M. (2004). Automatic keypress activation in skilled typing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 30, 555–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V. (2001). Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2, 661–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rock, I. (1977). In defense of unconscious inference. In W. Epstein (Hrsg.), Stability and constancy in visual perception: mechanisms and processes (S. 321–373). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schütz-Bosbach, S., & Prinz, W. (2007). Perceptual resonance: action-induced modulation of perception. Trends in Cognitive Science 11, 349–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, W. (2007). Large-scale temporal coordination of cortical activity as a prerequisite for conscious experience. In M. Velmans, & S. Schneider (Hrsg.), The Blackwell companion to consciousness (S. 605–615). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titchener, E. B. (1911). A text-book of psychology. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. (2007). Mind in life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela, F. J., Lachaux, J. P., Rodriguez, E., & Martinerie, J. (2001). The brainweb: phase sychronization and large-scale integration. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2, 229–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehrle, M. (2013). Horizonte der Aufmerksamkeit. Entwurf einer dynamischen Konzeption der Aufmerksamkeit aus phänomenologischer und kognitionspsychologischer Sicht. Paderborn: Wilhelm Fink.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, S., & Thies, B. (2000). Is ‚change blindness‘ attenuated by domain-specific expertise? An expert-novices comparison of change detection in football images. Visual Cognition 7, 163–173.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Leuven, Belgien

    Dr. Maren Wehrle

  2. Köln, Deutschland

    Prof. Dr. Thiemo Breyer

Authors
  1. Dr. Maren Wehrle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Prof. Dr. Thiemo Breyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maren Wehrle .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Deutsches Institut für Internationale Pädagogische Forschung, Berlin, Germany

    Sabine Reh

  2. Deutsches Institut für Internationale Pädagogische Forschung, Berlin, Germany

    Kathrin Berdelmann

  3. Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Nürnberg, Germany

    Jörg Dinkelaker

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wehrle, M., Breyer, T. (2015). Attentionale Horizonte zwischen Phänomenologie und Psychologie. In: Reh, S., Berdelmann, K., Dinkelaker, J. (eds) Aufmerksamkeit. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-19381-6_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-19381-6_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-19380-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-531-19381-6

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation