Abstract
Growing up in a political as well as an intellectual environment, Max Weber not only sought to comprehend the world but also to change it. Arguably, he took Karl Marx’s 11th. Thesis on Feuerbach that “philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways; the point, however, is to change it,” far more seriously than its author. Marx, after all, did not reflect, in any systematic fashion, on the place of intellectuals and their ideas in history. Equally, Emile Durkheim – perhaps because he saw sociology as a deeply moral science, devoted to deriving what ought to be from what is – did not seriously concern himself with political engagement. Among these three founding figures of sociology, it was only Weber, who paid sustained attention to science and politics both in his life and in his writing. He strove to fathom the relation between sociology of society and sociology in society, between theory and practice. Although the notion of public sociology was absent from his conceptual armory, of the three Weber offers the greatest contribution, albeit indirectly, to the meaning, challenges and possibilities of public sociology. In, thus, filling out Weber’s reflexive sociology with the notion of public sociology, I show the continuing relevance of his framework for the problems facing sociology and society today.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Barbalet, Jack M. (2001): Weber's Inaugural Lecture and Its Place in his Sociology. In: Journal of Classical Sociology 1(2): 147–170
Gerth, Hans H./Mills, Wright C. (eds.) (1946): From Max Weber. New York: Oxford University Press
Kemple, Thomas (2005): Instrumentum Vocale: A Note on Max Weber's Value-Free Polemics and Sociological Aesthetics. In: Theory, Culture & Society 22(4): 1–22
Lassman, Peter (ed.) (1994): Weber: Political Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Mommsen, Wolfgang (1974): Max Weber and German Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Schluchter, Wolfgang (1996): Paradoxes of Modernity: Culture and Conduct in the Theory of Max Weber. Stanford: Stanford University Press
Shils, Edward A./Finch, Henry A. (eds.) (1949): The Methodology of the Social Sciences. New York: Free Press
Shils, Edward, A. (1974): Max Weber on Universities: The Power of the State and the Dignity of the Academic Calling in Imperial Germany. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Weber, Max (1895[1994]): The Nation State and Economic Policy. In: Lassman (1994): 1–28
Weber, Max (1904[1949]): ‘Objectivity’ in Social Science and Social Policy. In: Shils/Finch (1949): 49–112
Weber (1917[1949]): The Meaning of ‘Ethical Neutrality’ in Sociology and Economics. In: Shils/Finch (1949): 1–47
Weber, Max (1917[1994]): Parliament and Government in Germany under a New Political Order. In: Lassman (1994): 130–271
Weber, Max (1917[1946]): Science as a Vocation. In: Gerth/Mills (1946): 129–156
Weber, Max (1918[1994]): Socialism. In: Lassman (1994): 272–303
Weber, Max (1919[1946]): Politics as a Vocation. In: Gerth/Mills (1946): 77–128
Weber, Marianne (1926[1988]): Max Weber: A Biography. Transaction Publishers: New Brunswick, NJ
Wolin, Sheldon (1981): Max Weber: Legitimation, Method, and The Politics of Theory. In: Political Theory 9(3): 401–24
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Burawoy, M. (2012). From Max Weber to Public Sociology. In: Soeffner, HG. (eds) Transnationale Vergesellschaftungen. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-18971-0_69
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-18971-0_69
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-531-18169-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-531-18971-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)