Skip to main content

Epistemischer Relativismus

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbuch Erkenntnistheorie

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Barnes, Barry/Bloor, David: Relativism, Rationalism and the Sociology of Knowledge. In: Hollis, Martin/Lukes, Steven (Hg.): Rationality and Relativism. Oxford 1982, 21–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blom, Philipp: Böse Philosophen: Ein Salon in Paris und das vergessene Erbe der Aufklärung. München 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boghossian, Paul: Replies to Wright, MacFarlane and Sosa. In: Philosophical Studies 141/3 (2008): 409–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boghossian, Paul: Angst vor der Wahrheit. Frankfurt a. M. 2013 (engl. 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boghossian, Paul: Der Relativismus des Normativen. In: Gabriel, Markus (Hg.): Der neue Realismus. Frankfurt a. M. 2014, 362–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, Adam: Metaepistemology and Relativism. Basingstoke 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, Roderick M.: The Problem of the Criterion. Milwaukee 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coliva, Annalisa: Moore and Wittgenstein: Scepticism, Certainty and common sense. Basingstoke. Hampshire 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans-Pritchard, Edward E.: Witchcraft, Oracles and Magic among the Azande. Oxford 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, Paul: Wider den Methodenzwang. Frankfurt a. M. 1986 (engl. 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, Alvin: Epistemic Relativism and Reasonable Disagreement. In: Feldman, Richard/Warfield, Ted (Hg.): Disagreement. Oxford 2009, 187–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hales, Stephen: Relativism and the Foundations of Philosophy. Cambridge, Mass. 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, Gilbert/Thomson, Judith J.: Moral Relativism and Moral Objectivity. Cambridge, Mass. 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazlett, Allan: Entitlement and Mutually Recognized Reasonable Disagreement. In: Episteme 11/1 (2014), 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Thomas: Die Struktur wissenschaftlicher Revolutionen. Frankfurt a. M. 1988 (engl. 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusch, Martin: Psychologism: A Case Study in the Sociology of Philosophical Knowledge. London 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusch, Martin: Knowledge by Agreement. Oxford 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusch, Martin: Epistemic Relativism, Scepticism, Pluralism. In: Synthese, Online First (2016), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacFarlane, John: Boghossian, Bellarmine, and Bayes. In: Philosophical Studies 141/3 (2008), 391–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacFarlane, John: Assessment Sensitivity: Relative Truth and its Applications. Oxford 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marenbon, John: Pagans and Philosophers: The Problem of Paganism from Augustine to Leibniz. Princeton 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platon: Theaitetos. In: Platon: Sämtliche Werke in drei Bänden, Bd. 2. Hg. von Erich Loewenthal. Darmstadt 2004, 561–661.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard, Duncan: Defusing epistemic relativism. In: Synthese 166/2 (2009), 397–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard, Duncan: Epistemic Angst: Radical Skepticism and the Groundlessness of our Believing. Princeton 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard: Der Spiegel der Natur. Eine Kritik der Philosophie. Frankfurt a. M. 1981 (engl. 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sankey, Howard: Witchcraft, Relativism and the Problem of the Criterion. In: Erkenntnis 72/1 (2010), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidel, Markus: Why the Epistemic Relativist Cannot Use the Sceptic’s Strategy: A Comment on Sankey. In: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 44/1 (2013), 134–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidel, Markus: Epistemic Relativism: A Constructive Critique. Houndsmill 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, Jason: Is Epistemology Tainted? In: Disputatio 8/42 (2016), 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stich, Stephen: The Fragmentation of Reason. Cambridge, Mass. 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Michael: Why Wittgensteinian Contextualism is not Relativism. In: Episteme 4/1 (2007), 93–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig: Ãœber Gewissheit. Frankfurt a. M. 1984 (engl. 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Crispin: Fear of Knowledge. In: Philosophical Studies 141/3 (2008), 379–390.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Kusch .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kusch, M. (2019). Epistemischer Relativismus. In: Grajner, M., Melchior, G. (eds) Handbuch Erkenntnistheorie. J.B. Metzler, Stuttgart. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-04632-1_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-04632-1_41

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: J.B. Metzler, Stuttgart

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-476-04631-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-476-04632-1

  • eBook Packages: J.B. Metzler Humanities (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics